Dinamika Pola Interaksi Kolaboratif Antar Aktor Dalam Tata Kelola Sampah di Kota Banjarmasin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jkjap.v12i1.20756
waste management, collaborative governance, network governance, banjarmasin, mixed methods
Abstract
This study addresses the persistent ineffectiveness of waste management in Banjarmasin, highlighted by the growing waste accumulation at the Basirih Landfill and along urban roadsides following administrative sanctions from the Indonesian Ministry of Environment. Despite a daily waste production of approximately 600 tons, regional facilities currently handle only 105 tons, signaling a critical governance gap. Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, this research analyzes waste management through the dual lenses of Network Governance and Collaborative Governance. Quantitative data were gathered from 107 diverse stakeholders, followed by in-depth qualitative interviews with key informants and Participatory Development Waste Action (PDWA) sessions. The results reveal that while there is high cognitive readiness for collaboration, the actual implementation remains at a moderate level, characterized by a "strong at the bottom, fragile in the middle" model. The governance network is currently fragmented, with interactions being largely ad-hoc and seremonial rather than institutionalized. Key barriers include a significant power imbalance dominated by the state, lack of formal institutional design, and the absence of a "metagovernor" role to synchronize bottom-up community initiatives with private sector resources. This study recommends that the Banjarmasin Municipal Government transition from a technical operator to a network steerer by establishing a permanent collaborative forum, institutionalizing long-term MOUs, and adopting an adaptive pentahelix model to bridge current collaboration gaps and ensure systemic sustainability.
References
Ansell, C., Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2020). The orchestrating role of public governors in collaborative governance. Public Administration, 98(4), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12686
Arbain, T. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Memahami fenomena sosial melalui perspektif kritis. ULM Press.
Arbain, T. (2021). Urbanisasi dan tantangan pemukiman perkotaan di Indonesia. Lambung Mangkurat University Press.
Bevir, M. (2013). A theory of governance. University of California Press.
Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
Bodin, Ö., Alexander, S. M., Baggio, J., Barnes, M. L., Berardo, R., Cumming, G. S., Guerrero, A. M., Sayold, A. J., & Wang, P. (2019). Improving network approaches to the study of complex social-ecological interdependencies. Nature Sustainability, 2(7), 551–559.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cristofoli, D., Douglas, S., Gulluscio, C., & t’Hart, P. (2021). Better together? Exploring the cross-sector collaboration—Performance link. Public Management Review, 24(8), 1173–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893801
Douglas, S., Ansell, C., Parker, C. F., Sorensen, E., t’Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2020). Understanding collaboration: A review of influence factors and institutional design. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1021–1034.
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Hamilton, M., Fischer, A. P., & Jasny, L. (2021). Bridging nodes and coordination in collaborative environmental governance. Policy Studies Journal, 49(2), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12384
Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Stephen, S. (2019). Policy making in the real world: The contribution of the implementation sciences. Health Policy, 123(10), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.02.010
Isril, I., Febrina, R., & MS, S. (2019). Collaborative governance dalam pengelolaan sampah di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JUAN), 7(2), 55–68.
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
Lestari, A. S., & Halimatussadiah, A. (2022). Community-based waste management and the role of social capital: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6542.
Lin, Z., Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. (2025). Public perception and compliance in urban waste sorting: A longitudinal study. Environmental Science & Policy, 164, 103–115.
Lisa, M., & others. (2024). Inovasi kepemimpinan fasilitatif dalam tata kelola sampah perkotaan: Studi kasus Surabaya. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Indonesia.
Maarif, N., & others. (2024). Dinamika praktik kolaborasi dalam pengelolaan sampah di Jakarta. Jurnal Lingkungan Dan Kebijakan.
Napitupulu, D., & Muhyidin, A. (2021). Desentralisasi dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam tata kelola lingkungan perkotaan. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah.
Prabawati, I., Frimawaty, N., & Haryanto, A. (2023). Ekonomi sirkular dan kemitraan strategis dalam pengelolaan sampah. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik.
Rittl, L. G. F., Zaman, A., & de Oliveira, F. H. (2025). Digital transformation in waste management: A network perspective. Sustainability, 17(4), 1608.
Rusmawan, T., Kurniasih, D., & Setyoko, P. I. (2022). Proses collaborative governance dalam inovasi pengelolaan sampah berbasis digital (Studi di Kabupaten Banyumas). Dinamika Governance: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 12(3), 335–342.
Setiawandari, N. E. P., & Kriswibowo, A. (2023). Collaborative governance dalam pengelolaan sampah. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 14(2), 226–233.
Suardi, P. A., Mahful, R., Suriadi, N. A., & Chairunnisa, C. (2025). Analisis komparatif partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengelolaan sampah pesisir. Jurnal Noken: Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 11(2), 601–610.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2021). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. Georgetown University Press.
Torfing, J., Andersen, L. B., Greve, C., & Klausen, K. K. (2020). Public governance paradigms: Theory and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ulibarri, N., Emerson, K., Gerlak, A. K., & Nabatchi, T. (2020). Collaborative governance online: Teaching and learning collaborative skills in a virtual environment. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 26(3), 350–373.
Vangen, S., Hayes, J. P., & Cornforth, C. (2015). Governing collaborative networks: Leadership, structure, and agency. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1231–1255.
World Bank. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications.
Zhang, X., & Zhu, X. (2022). Collaborative governance in urban agglomerations: Structural balance and actor dynamics. Land Use Policy, 115, 106024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
