Quality Assurance System Policy Evaluation Strategy to Increase the Competitiveness of Private Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v9i2.10474Kata Kunci:
implementation strategy, policy evaluation, quality assurance systemAbstrak
The purpose of this study was to find out and analyze how the higher education quality assurance system works and to find out and analyze the dimensions of quality assurance system policy evaluation to improve the competitiveness of private tertiary institutions in the city of Bandung. This study uses a descriptive analysis method with a qualitative type and is supported by the SWOT technique. The results of the study show that the implementation of the quality assurance system for Private Higher Education in Bandung City is still not effective, so a policy evaluation is needed through (1) Administrative evaluation by taking into account: Effort evaluation, performance evaluation, adequacy of performance, efficiency evaluation and process evaluation, (2) Judicial evaluation by taking into account: Issues of legal validity, possible violations of the constitution, possible violations of the legal system, possible violations of ethics and state administration rules, (3) Political evaluation by taking into account: Political process in determining policies, acceptance of political constituencies towards public policies, implementation information technology. The results of the policy evaluation in this study then produce recommendation strategies related to the implementation of the Higher Education quality assurance system by the government's standard provisions.
Referensi
Anderson, J. E. (2003). An Introduction. In Public Policy Making. Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company. http://www.kropfpolisci.com/public.policy.anderson.pdf
Dwiyanto, A. (2012). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, Peduli, Inklusif, dan Kolaboratif. Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press.
Dye, T. R. (1981). Understanding Public Policy. New Jersey: Prentice–Hall, Inc.
Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia number, Pub. L. No. 15.
Lester, James P, and Y. S. (2000). Public Policy: An Evolutionary
Approach (2nd ed.). Australia: Wadworth.
Muhiddin, A. (2017). Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik (Studi Kesiapan Desa Menerima Dana Desa di Kabupaten Gowa) (Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar. Diperoleh dari http://eprints.unm.ac.id/4365/
Nugroho, R. D. (2007). Analisis Kebijakan. Jakarta: PT Elekmedia Komputindo.
Pearce, J.A. and Robinson, R. . (2011). Strategic Management Formulation Implementation and Control (Twelfth Ed). New York: Mc. Graw-Hill International.
Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Richard D. Bingham, and C. L. F. (1989). Evaluation in Practice: A
Methodological Approach. London: Longmans.
Weiss, C. (1972). Evaluating Action Programs; Readings in Social Action and Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Winarno, B. (2014). Kebijakan Publik: Teori, Proses, dan Studi Kasus. Yogyakarta: Center of Academic Publishing Service (CAPS).
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg)
