The Effectiveness of Collaborative Problem-solving Using Decision-making Problems to Improve the Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills

Yulianti Yusal, Andi Suhandi, Wawan Setiawan, Ida Kaniawati

Abstract


Research on the effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving using decision-making problems in improving pre-service physics  teachers’ thinking skills has been carried out. This research aims to find out the effectiveness of the application of collaborative problem-solving using decision-making problems to improve the pre-service physics teachers’ critical thinking skills. The method used was pre-experiment with one group pretest-posttest design. The research subjects were 76 pre-service physics teachers at a university in the city of Makassar, South Sulawesi. An essay test of critical thinking skills was employed to collect the data that 6 items. The results showed that after implementing collaborative problem-solving using decision-making problems, students' critical thinking skills increased to high category, and most of the students’ critical thinking skills improvements are also categorized as high. Thus, collaborative problem-solving using decision-making problems is effective to improve the pre-service physics teachers critical thinking skills.

Keywords


Collaborative Problem-Solving, Critical Thingking Skills, Decision-Making Problems, Pre-Service Physics Teacher

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arvai, J. L., Campbell, V. E. A., Baird, A., & Rivers, L. (2004). Teaching students to make better decisions about the environment: lessons from the decision sciences. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(1), 33-44. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JOEE.36.1.33-44

Arya, D., & Maul, A. (2016). The building of knowledge, language, and decision-making about climate change science: a cross-national program for secondary students. International Journal of Science Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301826532_The_building_of_knowledge_language_and_decision-making_about_climate_change_science_a_cross-national_program_for_secondary_students

Asha, I. K., & Hawi, A. M. A. (2016). The impact of cooperative learning on developing the sixth grade students decision-making skill and academic achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(10). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099599

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizan, S., Ripley, M., Miller, R. M., & Rumble, M.(2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P.Griffin, B. Mc Gaw, & E. Care (Ed.), Assesment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17-66). New York: Spinger

Chang, C. J., Chang M. H., Chiu, B. C., Liu, C. C., Chiang, S. H. F., Wen, C.T., Hwang, F.K., Wu, Y. T., Chao, P. Y., Lai, C. H., Wu, S. W., Chang, C. K. & Chen, W.(2017). An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations, Computers & Education, 114, 222-235. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131517301720?via%3Dihub

Chattabud, J., Suwannoi, P., Sranamkam, T., Yuenyong, C. (2015). Thai students’ decision making in societal issue of surface area and concentrated solutions as a factor in the rate of chemical reactions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (6). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283947038_Thai_Students'_Decision_Making_in_Societal_Issue_of_Surface_Area_and_Concentrated_Solutions_as_a_Factor_in_the_Rate_of_Chemical_Reactions

Chen, L., Inoue, K., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., Konomi, S., Ogata, H., & Yamada, M. (2020). Exploring factors thatlinfuence collaborative problem solving awareness inlscience education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10758-020-09436-8

Montjoye, Y. A. D., Stopczynski, A., Shmueli, E., Pentland, A., & Lehmann, S. (2014). The strength of the strongest ties in collaborative problem solving, Scientific Reports, 4 : 5277. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep05277?origin=ppub

Eggert, S., Ostermeyer, F., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2012). Socioscientific decision making in the science classroom: the Effect of embedded metacognitive instructions on students’ learning outcomes. Education Research International https://www.hindawi.com/journals/edri/2013/309894/

Eldhy, E. F., & Sulaiman, F. (2013).Integrated PBL approach: preliminary findings towards physics students’ critical thinking and creative-critical thinking. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2 (3), 18-25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309107003_Integrated_PBL_Approach_Preliminary_Findings_towards_Physics_Students'_Critical_Thinking_and_Creative-Critical_Thinking

Evagorou, M., Pilar, M., Aleixandre, J., & Osborne, J. (2012). Should we kill the grey squirrels?’a study exploring students’ justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (3), 401–428. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2011.619211

Fund, Z., & Madjar, N. (2018). The influence of scaffolded computerised science problem solving on motivational aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 1528644. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2018.1528644

Grace, M., Lee, Y. C., Asshoff, R., Wallin, A. (2015). Student decision-making about a globally familiar socioscientific issue: the value of sharing and comparing views with international counterparts. International Journal of Science Education, 37 (11), 1855–1874. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2015.1054000

Gresch, H., & Bögeholz, S. (2013). Identifying non-sustainable course of action: prerequisite for decision making in education for sustainable development. Res Sci Educ, 43, hal. 733-754. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-012-9287-0

Hadjichambi, D. P., Hadjichambis, A. C., & Konstantinos, K. (2015). How students’ values are intertwined with decisions in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10 (3), 493-513. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280368110_How_Students'_Values_are_Intertwined_with_Decisions_in_a_Socio-scientific_Issue

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six thousand student survey of mechanichs test data for introductory physics course. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 66-47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228710512_Interactive-Engagement_Versus_Traditional_Methods_A_Six-Thousand-Student_Survey_of_Mechanics_Test_Data_for_Introductory_Physics_Courses

Ismail, N. S., Harun, J., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., & Salleh, S. M. (2018). The effect mobile problem-based learning application DicScience PBL on students’ critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 177-195. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8064434

Jackson, S. A., Kleitman, S., Stankov, L., Howie, P. (2015). Decision pattern analysis as a general framework for studying individual differences in decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(4), 392-408. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278329159_Decision_Pattern_Analysis_as_a_General_Framework_for_Studying_Individual_Differences_in_Decision_Making

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning To Solve Problems. Newyork: Routledge.

Joshi, M. (2017). Soft Skills 1st Edition. Bangalore: Senior Trainer Acharya Institute of English & Foreign Languages

Kadir, H. D., Arsyad, M., & Marisda, D. H.(2020). Implementation of problem solving methods in elasticity course. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, 8 (3), 279-285. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jpf/article/view/3803/2761

Kelly, R., McLoughlin, E., & Finlayson, O. E. (2016). Analysing student written solutions to investigate if problem-solving processes rre evident throughout. International Journal of Science Education, 38 (11), 1766–1784. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2016.1214766

Kim, M., & Tan, H. T. (2013). A collaborative problem-solving process through environmental field studies. International Journal of Science Education , 35 (3), 357–387. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2012.752116

Kuo, E., Hallinen, N. R., & Conlin, L. K. (2017). When procedures discourage insight: epistemological consequences of prompting novice physics students to construct force diagrams. International Journal of Science Education, .1308037. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2017.1308037

Leak, A. E., Rothwell, S. L., Olivera, J., Zwickl, B., Vosburg, J., & Martin, K. N. (2017). Examining problem solving in physics-intensive Ph.D. research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13 (2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318537860_Examining_problem_solving_in_physics-intensive_PhD_research

Lindahl, M. G., & Linder, C. (2015). What’s natural about nature? deceptive concepts in socio scientific decision making. European Journal of Science and Mathematccs Education, 3 (3), 250-264. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279885775_What%27s_natural_about_nature_Deceptive_concepts_in_socio-scientific_decision-making

Malach, T. N., Meade, M. L., & Morrow, D. G. (2012). The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 2012, 18 (1), 32–58. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13546783.2011.642206

McMurtry & Humphrey. (2000). Decision Making and Problem Solving: Pengambilan Keputusan dan Pemecahan Masalah. Penerjemah: Peni Rahmawati. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.

Mercier, E., & Higgins, S. (2014). Creating joint representations of collaborative problem solving with multi-touch technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 497–510. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcal.12052

Mitrevski, B., & Sajkov, O. (2012). Physics lab, critical thinking and gender difference. Journal of Macedonian Physics. 48. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/PHYSICS-LAB%2C-CRITICAL-THINKING-AND-GENDER-Mitrevski-Zajkov/7ddf8bbc45eb928328d01eced5c2ea7e32507002

Oliveri, M. E., Lawless, R., & Molloy, H. (2017). A literature review on collaborative problem solving for college and workforce readiness. ETS Research Report Series, 2017(1). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ets2.12133

Presseisen, B. Z. (1984). Thinking skills: meaning and models. In Costa, A. L. (Ed.). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Virginia: Alexandria.

Putri, A. S., & Aznam, N. (2019). The effect of the science web module integrated on batik’s local potential towards students’ critical thinking and problem solving (thinking skill). Journal of Science Learning, 2 (3), 92-96. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jslearning/article/view/34

Romanoff, K. M., Rae, A., & Zakrzewzki, C. E. (2019). Romanoff a holistic and multifaceted model for ill-structured experiential problem-based learning: enhancing student critical thinking and communication skills. Journal of Based Learning in Higher Education, 7 (1), 70-96. https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/pbl/article/view/3341

Siribunnam, S., Nuangchalerm, P., & Jansawang N. (2014). Socio-scientific decision making in the science classroom. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 5 (4).

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556727.pdf

Swartz, Robert J.(2001). Thinking About Decision. Dalam Costa, Arthur (Penyunting). Developing of Minds. (pp. 58-66). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tampubolon, T., & Sitindaon, F. S. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem solving terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 7 Medan, J.INPAFI, 1 (3), 260-268. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/inpafi/article/view/1915/7853

Tekbiyik, A. (2015). The use of jigsaw collaborative learning method in teaching socioscientific issues: the case of nuclear energy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14 (2). http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/428

Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M. D., Elen, J. (2018). Designing learning environments for critical thinking: examining effective instructional approaches. Int J of Sci and Math Educ, 16, 1065–1089. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10763-017-9829-z

Yusal, Y. (2021). Profile of pre-service physics teacher’s critical thinking skills related to heat transfer, Journal of Physics: Conferences Series, 1157 032071.https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012075




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i2.5059

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View JPF Stats

   Free counters!

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.