Developing Electrical Magnetic Textbook Based On Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK)

Boisandi Boisandi, Syarif Lukman Hakim Alsagaf

Abstract


Electrical magnetic is a compulsory subject in the physics education program. One of the learning outcomes and graduates in the curriculum is to be able to analyze subject matter (pedagogical content knowledge). Researcher's observations during giving lectures on magnetic electricity showed that students paid less attention to the importance of understanding on the relationship between learning outcomes and teaching material during lectures. Thus, this phenomenon is appointed as one of the lecture evaluations in the study program. The lecture’s evaluation results in a recommendation to develop textbooks that are adjusted in learning outcomes and graduates that refer to the curriculum of the physics education program. It is not enough to stop here, the problem findings continue for online learning related to Work From Home policies during the pandemic. This of course requires the availability of references that can be open accessed. Hence, the researchers then attempted to develop electrical magnetic textbook based on PCK (pedagogical content knowledge) which contained material content and material content analysis according to learning outcomes and graduates in the curriculum of the Physics Education. This study aims to :  (1) determine the feasibility of electrical magnetic textbook based on PCK according to experts. (2) determine the  responses of students after using electrical magnetic textbook based on PCK. The research method uses research and development design by gathering information stages and references, designing, developing, product, validating, and revising the product. The research was conducted in 2020 in the physics education study program IKIP PGRI Pontianak. Data collection techniques are in the form of indirect communication techniques. Overall, electrical magnetic textbook based on PCK have been produced. The validation results show that textbooks have an average validation score of 77.77% with Eligible criteria. The students’ responses analysis show that textbooks developed have an average score of 78.52% with high criteria. After the revision, the textbook was presented with an online ISBN and open access on the online media

Keywords


Development, Electrical magnetic, Textbook, TPCK

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akturk, A. O., & Ozturk, H. S. (2019). Teachers’ TPACK levels and students’ self-efficacy as predictors of students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 5(1), 283–294. Retrieved from https://www.ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/543

Anwar, Y., Rustaman, N. Y., Widodo, A., & Redjeki, S. (2014). Kemampuan pedagogical content knowledge guru biologi yang berpengalaman dan yang belum berpengalaman. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 19(1), 69–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i1.426

Boisandi & Anita. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Eksperimen Fisika Material Solar Cell Berbasis TPACK. Jurnal Edukasi, 15(1), 1-10. doi: 10.31571/edukasi.v18i2.1837.

Borg. W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction. (4th ed.). New York: Longma.

Das, K., Gryseels, M., Sudhir, P., & Tan, K. T. (2016, October). Unlocking Indonesia’s digital opportunity. In McKinsey Indonesia Office. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Locations/Asia/Indonesia/Our%20Insights/Unlocking%20Indonesias%20digital%20opportunity/Unlocking_Indonesias_digital_opportunity.ashx

Deng, F., Chai, C. S., So, H. J., Qian, Y., & Chen, L. (2017). Examining the validity of the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework for preservice chemistry teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3508

Getuno, D.M., Kiboss, J.K., Changeiywo, Johnson M., & Ogola, L.B. (2015). Effects of an E-Learning Module an Students Attitudes in an Electronics Class. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(36), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP.

Giyatmi. (2016, February 10). Membudayakan Menulis Buku Ajar. Presentasi Dalam Workshop Budaya Menulis Di Kampus. UBAYA. Retrieved from https://ppj.uniska-bjm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/MENYUSUN-BUKU-AJAR.pdf

Gupta, A., & Fisher, D. (2012). Technology-supported learning environments in science classrooms in India. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 195–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9103-9

Laos, L. E., & Meti Tefu, M. (2020). The Development of Physics Teaching Materials Based On Local Wisdom To Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 5(2), 107-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v5i1.1471

McKemmish, S., Anwar, M., & Ardianto, D. (2017). IT empowering communities: How social media and mobile technologies shape Indonesia’s community landscape. Retrieved February 14, 2019, (Monash Doctoral Information Day). Retrieved from https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/1442855/ITEmpowering-Communities-How-social-media-and-mobile-technologies-shape-Indonesias-community-la ndscape.pdf

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006, June). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record. 108(6): 1017-1054. Retrieved from http://one2oneheights.pbworks.com/f/MISHRA_PUNYA.pdf

Nasar, A., Kaleka, M.B.U., & Alung, H.V. (2020). Applying the Learner-Centered Micro Teaching Model for Improving Teaching Confidence, Attitudes Toward Teaching Profession, and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of Physics Education Students. JPF Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, 8(3), 235-248. DOI: 10.26618/jpf.v8i3.3607

Nofrion, Wijayanto, B., Wilis, R., & Novio, R. (2018). Analisis technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) guru geografi di Kabupaten Solok, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Geografi, 10(2), 105– 116. doi: https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v10i2.9070

Poushter, J., Bishop, C., & Chwe, H. (2018). Social media use continues to rise in developing countries but plateaus across developed ones: Digital divides remain, both within and across countries. Retrieved from https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/06/15135408/Pew-Research-Cen ter_Global-Tech-Social-Media-Use_2018.06.19.pdf

Ramnarain, U.D. & Chanetsa, T. (2016). An Analysis of Sout African Grade 9 Natural science textbooks for their representation of nature of science, Internasional Journal of Science Education. 35(3), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1167985

Rehmat, A. P., & Bailey, J. M. (2014). Technology integration in a science classroom: Preservice teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 744–755. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007 /s10956-014-9507-7

Riduwan. (2014). Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Peneliti. (8th ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P., (2020). The Digital Literacy of The First Semester Students in Physics Education, JPF Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. 8(2), 101-110. DOI: 10.26618/jpf.v8i2.3293

Rosdianto, H. (2018). Rancang Bangun Alat Praktikum Gerak Jatuh Bebas Dengan Stopwatch Otomatis Sederhana. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika. 3(1), 20-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v5i1.1471

Sotiriou, S., Riviou, K., Cherouvis, S. & Chelioti E. (2016). Introducing Large-Scale Innovation in Schools. J Sci Educ Technol 25, 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9611-y

Sulisworo, D., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Nursulistiyo, E., & Handayani, T. (2019). Mobile learning infusion through enhancing teachers’ perception: Case study in eastern of Indonesia. International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity (STEACH 2018), 277, 85–88. https://doi.org/10.2991/steach-18.2019.19

Sumarli, Murdani, E., & Wijaya, A.K., (2017). Pengembangan Buku Petunjuk Praktikum Fisika: Pengujian Jenis Kawat Konduktor Komersial. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika. 2(2), 30-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v5i1.1471

Swallow, M. J. C., & Olofson, M. W. (2017). Contextual understandings in the TPACK framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 228–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017. 1347537

Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Sointu, E. (2018). Differences in pre-service teachers’ knowledge and readiness to use ICT in education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34, 174–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12225

Widodo, A. (2017). Experienced biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) on photosynthesis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(1), 060017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983985

Yeh, Y. F., Lin, T. C., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Hwang, F. K. (2015). Science teachers’ proficiency levels and patterns of TPACK in a practical context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 78–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i1.4379

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View JPF Stats

   Free counters!

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.