Analysis of Difficulty of Science Learning-Based Multi-Representation

Erniwati Erniwati, Luh Sukariasih, Hunaidah Hunaidah, La Sahara, Hasrida Hasrida, Muhammad Sirih, Suritno Fayanto

Abstract


This study aims to: (1) describe the physics learning difficulties of students of class VIII in the Junior High School 1 Pomalaa.; and (2) describing any factors that cause learning difficulties Physics learners in class VIII Junior High School 1 Pomala. Subjects in this study were all learners VIIIA class and VIIID Junior High School 1 Pomalaa the second semester with the topic learning in motion and force. The research instrument consisted of multi-representation ability tests and interviews and then analyzed descriptively using a quantitative approach. Data analysis results obtained:  The ability of multi-representation of students in the topic of motion and force is still relatively low with an achievement percentage of 71.86%. Learners are in a low category had a pattern of learning difficulties in understanding about the language, understand the basic concepts, analyze the image, determine the y-axis and the axis s, define symbols, set the equation and the difficulty in calculating. Learners medium category with a percentage of 27.35% achievement patterns of learning difficulties in understanding the basic concepts, force projection, determine the y-axis and s, erroneously define symbols, and erred in the calculation. Learners higher category has a pattern of learning difficulties in analyzing the image and determines the y-axis and the axis s on the graphical representation.

Keywords


Learning difficulties, Multi-representation, Motion, Force

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. Costa, H. Caldeira, J. R. Gallástegui, and J. Otero, “An analysis of question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 602–614, 2000.

A. Casadevall and F. C. Fang, “Field science-the nature and utility of scientific fields,” MBio, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1–4, 2015.

E. L. Milam, “Obsolete, extraneous, or pertinent? philosophy of science and historical studies in the physical (natural) sciences,” Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci., vol. 50, no. 1–2, pp. 17–24, 2020, doi: 10.1525/hsns.2020.50.1-2.17.

B. Demirdöğen, Interaction between science teaching orientation and pedagogical content knowledge components, Netherlands: Springer 2016.

B. Ekiz-Kiran and Y. Boz, “Interactions between the science teaching orientations and components of pedagogical content knowledge of in-service chemistry teachers,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 95–112, 2020.

S. Furwati, Sutopo, and S. Zubaidah, “Conceptual understanding and representation quality on Newton’s laws through multi-representation learning,” J. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 80–88, 2017.

R. J. Beichner, “The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1272–1277, 1996.

U. Uslima, C. Ertikanto, and U. Rosidin, “Contextual learning module based on multiple representations: the influence on students’ concept understanding,” Tadris J. Kegur. dan Ilmu Tarb., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 11, 2018.

I. Kusumawati, P. Marwoto, and S. Linuwih, “Implementation multi representation and oral communication skills in Department of Physics Education on Elementary Physics II,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1677, no. 040017, pp. 1–5, 2015.

S. N. Kane, A. Mishra, and A. K. Dutta, “Student representation of magnetic field concepts in learning by guided inquiry,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 795, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.

A. Dimas, A. Suparmi, S. Sarwanto, and D. A. Nugraha, “Analysis multiple representation skills of high school students on simple harmonic motion,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2014, no. September, pp. 1–7, 2018.

H. Haili, J. Maknun, and P. Siahaan, “Problem solving based learning model with multiple representations to improve student’s mental modelling ability on physics,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1868, no. Agustus, pp. 1–8, 2017.

J. M. Lodge, G. Kennedy, L. Lockyer, A. Arguel, and M. Pachman, “Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: an integrative review,” Front. Educ., vol. 3, no. June, pp. 1–10, 2018.

D. R. Ma’rifah, “Diagnosis kesulitan belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah perkembangan peserta didik,” J. Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 88–94, 2017.

M. Rozek and C. D. Stobäus, “Teachers dealing with learning difficulties during the process of schooling,” Creat. Educ., vol. 07, no. 17, pp. 2696–2709, 2016.

V. Prain and B. Waldrip, “An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 1843–1866, 2006.

P. B. Kohl and N. D. Finkelstein, “Effects of representation on students solving physics problems: A fine-grained characterization,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2006.

Y. Theasy, Wiyanto, and Sujarwata, “Identifikasi kesulitan belajar fisika berdasarkan kemampuan multi representasi,” Phys. Commun., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2017.

Yuliana, H. TMS, and Hamdani, “Kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan soal pesawat sederhana,”Tanjungpura University, 2019.

A. Malik, “Fungsi komunikasi antara guru dan siswa dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan (studi kasus proses belajar mengajar pada SMP Negeri 3 Sindue),” J. Interak., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 168–173, 2014.

M. U. Usman and L. Setiawati, Upaya Optimalisasi kegiatan belajar mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.

H. S. Aminah, “Peningkatan hasil belajar IPA melalui model kooperatif tipe jigsaw berbantu media gambar kelas IV SD,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 93–100, 2017.

Y. Lestari, “Penanaman nilai peduli lingkungan dalam pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam,” Trihayu J. Pendidik. Ke-SD-an, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2018.

V. M. Kumala, “Merancang modul, LKS, media dan alat peraga pembelajaran IPA SD,” Universitas Esa Unggul, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://vivimaykumala. weblog.esaunggul.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/ 7352/2018/03/Vivi-May-Kumala_Tugas-Kelompok_Pembelajaran-IPA-di-SD_Paralel-2015.pdf. [Accessed: 13-Jul-2020].

A. M. Nur, “The use of guided inquiry approach to improve class X students’ physics problem solving skills at SMA 1 Watampone Kabupaten Bone,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 183–196, 2019.

D. Iriani, “Diagnosis kesulitan siswa underachiever dalam menyelesaikan soal turunan fungsi aljabar kelas XI IPA SMA Islam Al-Falah Jambi,” Sainmatika J. Sains dan Mat. Univ. Jambi, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 221163, 2012.

W. Syafmen, “Identifikasi kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika di SMA (studi kasus SMAN. 11 Kota Jambi),” Kreatif, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2015.

T. Waruwu, “Identifikasi kesulitan belajar pada pembelajaran IPA dan pelaksanaan pembelajaran remedial,” J. Educ. Dev., vol. 08, no. 02, pp. 285–289, 2020.

D. R. Ningrum, “Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita di kelas xi man 1 Stabat tahun ajaran 2017/2018,” Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, 2018.

A. Anissofira, F. D. E. Latief, L. Kholida, and P. Sinaga, “Newton’s cradle experiment using video tracking analysis with multiple representation approach,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 895, no. 1, 2017.

M. Yusuf, Multirepresentasi dalam pembelajaran fisika. Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya, 2009.

E. Etkina et al., “Scientific abilities and their assessment,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2006.

Sujiono and Y. Nuran, Konsep dasar PAUD, 1st ed. Jakarta: Indeks, 2009.

P. B. Kohl and N. D. Finkelstein, “Patterns of multipe representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2008.

B. Andromeda, T. Djudin, and T. M. S. Haratua, “Analisis kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa pada konsep-konsep gaya di kelas X SMAN 3 Pontianak,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1–16, 2017.

E. Sujarwanto, A. Hidayat, and Wartono, “Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika pada modeling instruction pada siswa SMA kelas XI,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2014.

A. Rahman, L. Sutrisno, and Hamdani, “Ketidakmampuan pemecahan soalhukum archimedes berdasarkan taksonomi structure of the observed learning outcome siswa SMA,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1–11, 2014.

H. Tms and J. Sirait, “Representations based physics instruction to enhance students ’ problem solving,” Am. J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2016.

B. E. Prakoso, T. Djudin, and Hamdani, “Analisis kemampuan multirepresentasi peserta didik dalam mengerjakan soal gerak lurus berubah beraturan di sma,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1–13, 2017.

N. S. Anugraheni and J. Handhika, “Profil kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa dalam materi fluida,” Semin. Nas. Quantum #25, vol. 25, pp. 533–537, 1AD.

H. R. Dewi and A. C. Yusro, “Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan soal multirepresentasi pada materi kinematika dan dinamika,” Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Fis. II 2016, pp. 19–23, 2016.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i3.3924

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View JPF Stats

   Free counters!

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.