Development of an OBE-Oriented Digital Computational Physics Practicum Module on Numerical Root-Finding Using GNU Octave

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/hd52st53

Authors

  • Wahyu Dian Laksanawati Department of Physics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA
  • Feli Cianda Adrin Burhendi Department of Physics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA
  • Adinda Permata Fahira Master Teacher Brain Academy Ruang Guru

computational physics, digital module, GNU Octave, numerical root, outcome-based education

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology and computational systems has increased the need for physics learning resources that can strengthen students’ conceptual understanding, programming skills, and computational problem-solving abilities. In computational physics courses, students often have difficulty connecting numerical methods, algorithmic procedures, and software implementations, particularly in numerical root-finding. This study aimed to develop and determine the feasibility of an Outcome-Based Education (OBE)-oriented digital computational physics practicum module on numerical root-finding using GNU Octave. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which consists of five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The developed module integrates OBE-based learning outcomes, numerical root-finding concepts, numerical algorithms, GNU Octave programming tutorials, practicum worksheets, instructional videos, and learning evaluation components. The feasibility of the module was examined through material expert validation, media expert validation, a small-scale trial involving 23 Physics Education students, and a large-scale trial involving 75 students from several universities. The results showed that the material expert validation obtained an average score of 87%, while the media expert validation achieved 88%, both categorized as “Very Good.” Student responses in the small-scale trial showed percentages of 84.10% for display, 85% for material content, and 84% for video quality. In the large-scale trial, the display, material content, and video aspects obtained 85.3%, 87.78%, and 86.06%, respectively, all categorized as “Very Good.” The novelty of this study lies in integrating OBE principles with GNU Octave-based computational practicum activities into a structured digital module for numerical root-finding. The findings indicate that the developed module is feasible for supporting computational physics learning and contributes to physics education by providing an accessible, competency-oriented, and technology-based learning resource that strengthens students’ computational literacy, programming practice, and independent learning.

References

Adeoye, M. A., Wirawan, K. A. S. I., Pradnyani, M. S. S., & Septiarini, N. I. (2024). Revolutionizing Education: Unleashing the power of the ADDIE model for effective teaching and learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(1), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624

Agato, L., Sitompul, S. S., & Firdaus, F. (2025). Effectiveness of differentiated learning strategies with the problem based learning model in improving students’ learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i1.16665

Ali, L. U., Wahyuni, W., Azmar, A., Jumawal, J., & Fitriana, I. M. (2023). Improving science learning outcomes by applying problem-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.9913

Anggraini, L. M., Sudiarta, I. W., Qomariah, N., Alaa, S., & Handayana, I. G. N. Y. (2019). Peningkatan kompetensi komputasi fisika dan kimia untuk mahasiswa Program Studi Fisika FMIPA Universitas Mataram. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 2(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.31764/jpmb.v2i2.886

Arifani, D. Y. M., Savalas, L. R. T, Ananto, A. D., Junaidi, E., & Hadisaputra, S. (2021). Pengembangan modul praktikum kimia berbasis kimia komputasi pada materi asam basa. Prosiding SAINTEK LPPM Universitas Mataram, 3(1), 660-666. https://unram.sgp1.digitaloceanspaces.com/simlitabmas/kinerja/penelitian/prosiding/198011092003121001-1627085883-302_534_1_smsaintek.pdf

Bahtiar, B., & Azmar. A. (2022). The effect of using a virtual laboratory on students’ motivation and learning outcomes in physics learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 13–21. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jpf/article/view/6966

Behringer, E., & Engelhardt, L. (2017). Guest editorial: AAPT recommendations for computational physics in the undergraduate physics curriculum, and the Partnership for Integrating Computation into Undergraduate Physics. American Journal of Physics, 85(5), 325–326. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4981900

Caballero, M. D., & Merner, L. (2018). Prevalence and nature of computational instruction in undergraduate physics programs across the United States. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020129

Caballero, M. D., & Odden, T. O. B. (2024). Computing in physics education. Nature Physics, 20, 339–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02371-2

Dewi, I. M., & Setyasto, N. (2024). Development of Canva-based digital flipbook learning media for IPAS subject on respiratory system. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2300–2308. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7030

Eaton, J. W., Bateman, D., Hauberg, S., & Wehbring, R. (2018). GNU Octave version 4.4.1 manual: A high-level interactive language for numerical computations. GNU Octave. https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v11.1.0/

Fadillah, M. A., Asrizal, A., Festiyed, F., & Usmeldi, U. (2024). The effect of e-modules on physics learning in senior high school: A meta-analysis. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 574-589. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i3.21641

Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem-based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635

Ghadzia, G., Husna, H., & Yanti, I. R. (2023). The development of physics e-module based on discovery learning on optics materials in senior high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.8329

Haetami, A., Zulvita, N., Dahlan, D., Maysara, M., Marhadi, M. A., & Santoso, T. (2023). Investigation of problem-based learning (PBL) on Physics Education Technology (PhET) simulation in improving student learning outcomes in acid-base material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9738–9748. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4820

Haney, M. R., Dillon, H. E., & Kotas, J. (2025). Active learning modules for a numerical methods course. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 53(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231205368

Hasanah, R., Haris, M., & Hadisaputra, S. (2023). Pengembangan modul praktikum kimia komputasi: Uji inhibisi korosi turunan senyawa purin. Chemistry Education Practice, 6(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v6i1.3480

Irawati, E., Hartono, H., & Sulhadi, S. (2025). Development of computational physics practical instructions: Visualization of the Laplace equation phenomenon. Physics Communication, 9(1), 19–26. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/pc/article/view/11232/3259

Irvani, A. I., Rochintaniawati, D., Riandi, R., Sinaga, P., & Henukh, A. (2024). Analysis of quantum physics lectures from the perspective of the MBKM and OBE based higher education curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT), 10(1), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v10i1.6390

Khaharsyah, A., Purnama, A. Y., Rabiman, R., & Apriadna, A. M. (2025). Application of GNU Octave in simulating dynamic electrical physics concepts on BLDC electric motor trainer kits. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(9), 743–750. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i9.11973

Laili, U. F., Yusal, Y., Munifah, M., Nazy, S., & Daud, D. H. (2025). The impact of laboratory management module on students’ 4C competencies in physics education. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.26618/p7wvw568

Latifi, S., & Delkhosh, M. (2019). SPSMAT: GNU Octave software package for spectral and pseudospectral methods. Journal of Computational Science, 34, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.09964

Mardova, L., Putra, F., & Sari, R. (2025). Pengembangan e-modul interaktif fisika zat padat berbasis outcome-based education (OBE) untuk meningkatkan literasi sains dan pembelajaran mandiri mahasiswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah, 9(2), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v9i2.4909

Meiriza, M. S., Sembiring, A. M. J., Lubis, A. M., Mardiah, N., & Simbolon, L. L. (2025a). Development of educational podcast-assisted learning media using the OBE approach to improve critical thinking skills. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 1576–1588. https://journal.al-matani.com/index.php/jkip/article/view/1684

Meiriza, M. S., Situmorang, J., Putri, S. M., Siboro, S. R. J., & Joyanka, O. K. (2025b). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis web interaktif dengan pendekatan OBE untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(3), 1198–1212. https://etdci.org/journal/jrip/article/view/4075

Millen, N. R., & Supahar, S. (2023). The effectivity study: Implementation of the physics e-module with PjBL-STEM model to describe students’ creative thinking skills and learning motivation profile. Journal of Science Education Research, 7(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v7i2.62131

Muliyati, D., Sumardani, D., Siswoyo, S., Bakri, F., Permana, H., Handoko, E., & Sari, N. L. K. (2022). Development and evaluation of granular simulation for integrating computational thinking into computational physics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 2585–2612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10724-8

Nurmahasih, U., & Jumadi, J. (2023). The effect of utilizing the PBL model in physics learning on student learning outcomes: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 81–88. https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/article/view/2741

Praptama, S. S., Purwaningsih, E., Taufiq, A., & Setiyoaji, W. T. (2023). Module development through project-based learning to enhance students’ creative thinking. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.10731

Pratama, D. P. A., & Sakti, N. C. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran handout digital berbasis Android. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, 12(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v12i1.25327

Reski, A., Sari, D. K., Uskenat, K., & Jua, S. K. (2025). Enhancing self-regulated learning and conceptual understanding through a TPACK-based physics e-module on momentum and impulse. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.26618/vwec8n65

Sabo, H. C., Odden, T. O. B., & Caballero, M. D. (2026). How do we assess computation in physics? The Physics Teacher, 64(3), 200–203. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0174333

Soamole, A. S. D., Arafah, K., & Subaer, S. (2023). Implementation of problem-based learning model and its effect on students’ physics learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.10752

Sunardi, S., Suhandi, A., & Muslim, M. (2023). Profiles of facilities and students’ responses in supporting implementation of Raspberry Pi-based bifocal modeling. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i1.8892

Tawil, M., Said, M. A., & Suryansari, K. (2023). Authentic assessment development science to assess student competency. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i2.3294

Weller, D. P., Bott, T. E., Caballero, M. D., & Irving, P. W. (2022). Development and illustration of a framework for computational thinking practices in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020106

Yahya, M. H., Rokhmawati, R. I., & Amalia, F. (2024). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran interaktif untuk mata pelajaran informatika berbasis media digital dengan model ADDIE. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Teknologi Informasi, dan Edukasi Sistem Informasi (JUST-SI), 5(2), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.25126/justsi.v5i2.405

Yanti, F. A., Desstya, A., & Perdana, R. (2021). Analysis of physics learning outcomes in terms of student learning habits. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 9(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v9i1.3727

Yuliani, H., Andani, T., & Nastiti, L. R. (2025). Integration of PBL-based e-modules in physics education: Improving problem-solving skills on static fluid concept. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.26618/0ddpg995

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Development of an OBE-Oriented Digital Computational Physics Practicum Module on Numerical Root-Finding Using GNU Octave. (2026). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 14(2), 565-589. https://doi.org/10.26618/hd52st53

How to Cite

Development of an OBE-Oriented Digital Computational Physics Practicum Module on Numerical Root-Finding Using GNU Octave. (2026). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 14(2), 565-589. https://doi.org/10.26618/hd52st53