Physics Learning Media Based on Social Media: STEM-Based Videos on Renewable Energy through TikTok Application

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/8ngf2q75

Authors

  • Yuberti Department of Physics Education, Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung
  • Muhammad Ridho Syarlisjiswan Department of Physics Education, Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung
  • Sri Latifah Department of Physics Education, Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung
  • Rahma Diani Department of Physics Education, Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung
  • Yani Suryani Department of Physics Education, Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung
  • Enike Ratnadilla Department of Physics Education, Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung

ADDIE model, digital learning, STEM education, renewable energy, TikTok education

Abstract

The integration of digital technology into senior high school physics teaching is becoming more urgent to support students’ engagement and understanding of abstract concepts, especially in time-limited classroom settings. TikTok, as a short-form video platform with strong visual and audiovisual features, offers potential to deliver brief, interactive learning content aligned with students’ digital habits. This study aimed to create STEM-based learning videos on renewable energy topics through TikTok and to evaluate their feasibility and appeal as teaching tools. The study used a Research and Development (R&D) approach, employing the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation), and was conducted at SMA Islam Elsyihab Bandar Lampung. Product feasibility was assessed by four validators two media experts and two content experts while user responses were gathered from a physics teacher and 37 students via questionnaires. The results show that the videos are highly feasible: media expert validation averaged 90%, and content expert validation averaged 84%, both classified as very feasible. User evaluations also demonstrated strong acceptance; the teacher rated the videos as 96% (very interesting), and student responses averaged 92% (very interesting), indicating high perceived attractiveness and educational support. The novelty of this study lies in combining a STEM instructional design with TikTok short videos on renewable energy physics, supported by a systematic ADDIE development process and tested by multiple stakeholders for feasibility and appeal. In conclusion, STEM-focused TikTok learning videos are feasible, engaging, and accessible digital resources that can supplement traditional instruction and promote student-centered learning in senior high school physics. This study advances physics education by offering a validated model for utilizing popular social media platforms to deliver structured STEM content and boost engagement through technology-rich learning environments.

References

Abualrob, M. M. A. (2025). TikTok for science learning: The interplay of TikTok as an educational tool, usability, satisfaction, skills, and future impact. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.595

Agustina, M., & Syarlisjiswan, M. R. (2023). Pengembangan media handout elektronik menggunakan double loop model pemecahan masalah (DLPS) pada materi fisika untuk siswa SMA kelas X. Skripsi. Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.

Bhandari, A., & Bimo, S. (2022). Why’s everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media. Social Media and Society, 8(1), 20563051221086241. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241

Bhaw, N., Hungwe, R., & Kriek, J. (2024). A study on the impact of Khan Academy videos: Enhancing Grade 11 thermodynamics learning in a rural high school. Science Education International, 35(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i2.10

Baran, B., Yecan, E., Kaptan, B., & Paşayiğit, O. (2020). Using augmented reality to teach fifth grade students about electrical circuits. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1371–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10001-9

Boateng, R., Boateng, S. L., Awuah, R. B., Ansong, E., & Anderson, A. B. (2016). Videos in learning in higher education: Assessing perceptions and attitudes of students at the University of Ghana. Smart Learning Environments, 3, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0031-5

Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125

Conde-Caballero, D., Castillo-Sarmiento, C. A., Ballesteros-Yánez, I., Rivero-Jiménez, B., & Mariano-Juárez, L. (2024). Microlearning through TikTok in higher education: An evaluation of uses and potentials. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2365–2385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11904-4

Farrokhnia, M., Meulenbroeks, R. F. G., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2021). Student-generated stop-motion animation in science classes: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 797-812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09857-1

Handayani, E. S., Yuberti, Saregar, A., & Wildaniati, Y. (2021). Development of STEM-integrated physics e-module to train critical thinking skills: The perspective of preservice teachers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012100

Hapsari, A. S., Hanif, M., Gunarhadi, & Roemintoyo. (2019). Motion graphic animation videos to improve the learning outcomes of elementary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1245–1255. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1245

Hochberg, K., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2018). Using smartphones as experimental tools—Effects on interest, curiosity, and learning in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9731-7

Irawan, I. D. A., Kusairi, S., Khusaini, K., Basri, N. A., & Dahlan, A. (2025). Development of a computer-based interactive video formative feedback to improve students’ conceptual understanding of static fluid. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17899

Jacobsen, M., & McKenney, S. (2023). Ensuring methodological fit when conducting educational design research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 2743-2762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10282-5

Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021). The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120

Lee, C.-J., & Kim, C. (2017). A technological pedagogical content knowledge based instructional design model: A third version implementation study in a technology integration course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 1627–1654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9544-z

Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2024). A meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of instructional video technologies. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 2081–2115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09669-3

Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6

Moreira-Mora, T., & Espinoza-Guzmán, J. (2016). Initial evidence to validate an instructional design-derived evaluation scale in higher education programs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0007-0

Resminingpuri, N., Elizabeth, K., Ayuk, T., Puspaningsih, R., & Revisi, E. (2023). Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam SMA/MA Kelas X Edisi Revisi, (H. S. Yulianto & I. Y. Nafawi, Eds.; Revisi, 2023). Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://buku.kemdikbud.go.id

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8

Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Škugor, A. (2021). Video-based learning (VBL)-Past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26, 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09455-5

Safira, I., Wahid, A., Rahmadhanningsih, S., Nurhayati, N., Suryadi, A., & Swandi, A. (2021). The relationship between students’ learning motivation and learning outcomes through guided discovery model assisted video and interactive simulation. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i2.5107

Samsudin, I., Purnomo, R. R., & Darmayanti. (2023). Dasar-dasar teknik energi terbarukan. In Static.Buku.Kemdikbud.Go.Id. https://buku.kemdikbud.go.id

Shanmugasundaram, M. S., & Tamilarasu, A. T. (2023). The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: A review. Frontiers in Cognition, 2, 1203077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2023.1203077

Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Suprapto, E., Saryanto, Sumiharsono, R., & Ramadhan, S. (2020). The analysis of instrument quality to measure the students’ higher order thinking skill in physics learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 520–527. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.42

Syarlisjiswan, M. R., Diani, R., & Alfiani, P. (2024). E-Modul Fisika Dengan Canva: Mengitegrasikan Socio Scientific Issues Untuk Pembelajaran Masa Kini. Biochephy: Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.52562/biochephy.v4i1.1139

Ulu, Y., & Yerdelen-Damar, S. (2024). Metacognition and epistemic cognition in physics are related to physics identity through the mediation of physics self-efficacy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20, 010130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010130

Wulan, D., Syaifullah, Saputra, E., Rahmawita, M., & Marsal, A. (2024). Analysis of user experience of the CapCut application in Generation Z for social media content using the User Experience Questionnaire method. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 11(3), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v11i3.7543

Yuberti, Y., Komikesari, H., & Lubis, M. (2022). Developing STEM-based interactive e-books to improve students’ science literacy. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 7(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i1.10914

Yuberti, Y., Wardhani, D. K., & Latifah, S. (2021). Pengembangan mobile learning berbasis smart apps creator sebagai media pembelajaran fisika. Physics and Science Education Journal (PSEJ), 1, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.30631/psej.v1i2.746

Yuberti, Y., Wiliyanti, V., & Febriyani, A. (2023). Harmonizing STEM with arts: Crafting an innovative physics electronic module on vibration and wave concepts. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 11(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpf.v11.n2.202303

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

Physics Learning Media Based on Social Media: STEM-Based Videos on Renewable Energy through TikTok Application. (2026). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 14(1), 220-239. https://doi.org/10.26618/8ngf2q75

How to Cite

Physics Learning Media Based on Social Media: STEM-Based Videos on Renewable Energy through TikTok Application. (2026). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 14(1), 220-239. https://doi.org/10.26618/8ngf2q75