The Effect of Implementing the CoCoAER and Jigsaw Learning Models on Enhancing Students' Understanding of Concepts in Static Fluid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17435
CoCoAER, concept understanding, jigsaw learning, static fluid, student satisfaction level
Abstract
The increasing complexity of physics learning in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era demands innovative pedagogical strategies to address students’ conceptual difficulties, particularly in abstract topics like static fluid. Misconceptions about hydrostatic pressure remain prevalent due to traditional, non-contextual instructional approaches. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two cooperative learning models CoCoAER and Jigsaw in improving students’ conceptual understanding of static fluid and to examine students’ perceptions of both methods. A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group was applied to 90 eleventh-grade students at MAN 3 Banda Aceh, divided into CoCoAER, Jigsaw, and conventional lecture groups. Data were collected through pre-and post-tests and student response questionnaires. Results from ANOVA and N-Gain analysis indicated that the CoCoAER model significantly outperformed both the Jigsaw and lecture models (p < 0.05), with 73.3% of students showing high improvement and an average post-test score of 86. Students' satisfaction also favored CoCoAER, with 96% indicating a “very satisfied” rating, compared to 50% and 40% for Jigsaw and conventional methods, respectively. The novelty of this study lies in applying the CoCoAER model to fluid dynamics, integrating contextual learning, collaboration, and error anticipation strategies. In conclusion, the CoCoAER model offers a highly effective and student-centered approach to teaching static fluid, contributing to the reduction of misconceptions and enhancing physics learning outcomes.References
Afrianti, S., Novita, N., Ginting, F. W., Syafrizal, S., & Zahara, S. R. (2022). Development of stem-based lkpd with guided inquiry design to improve student’s science process skills. Radiasi : Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 15(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v15i2.2289
Alatas, F., & Astuti, W. (2019). Developing simple teaching aids on static fluid material as a learning media for physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v7i2.1749
Al-shehri, E. K., & Alaudan, R. (2024). Teacher-centered or student-centered learning approach to promote learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 20(1), 47–51.
Amalissholeh, N., Sutrio, S., Rokhmat, J., & Gunada, I. W. (2023). Analisis kesulitan belajar peserta didik pada pembelajaran fisika di SMAN 1 Kediri. Empiricism Journal, 4(2), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v4i2.1387
Ambon, J., Alias, B. S., Komariah, A., & Mansor, A. N. (2024). The impact of continuous professional development on teaching quality: a systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(6), 3838-3847. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.30427
Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2019). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed.). In Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.366
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimentall designs for research. In Handbook of research on teaching; Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cuppen, E. (2012). A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy. Research Policy, 41(3), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2011.12.006
Damayanti, I., & Rudyatmi, E. (2020). The effectiveness of jigsaw type cooperative model assisted by kahoot media towards student interest and learning outcomes at SMA negeri 1 Sokaraja. Journal of Biology Education, 9(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v9i2.36476
Darsan. (2022). Improving student interests and learning outcomes with the jigsaw type cooperative learning model approach in Al Madinah elementary school students, Jember. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 6(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.31537/jeti.v6i1.1332
Díez, F., Villa, A., López, A. L., & Iraurgi, I. (2020). Impact of quality management systems in the performance of educational centers: Educational policies and management processes. Heliyon, 6(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03824
Fajri, M., Zainuddin., Hamid, A., & Syukri, M. (2022). Peningkatan pemahaman konsep melalui model CoCoAER berbasis scientific approach pada siswa SMPN 1 Darussalam. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Humaniora, X(2), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.32672/jsa.v10i2.4077
Goszewski, M., Moyer, A., Bazan, Z., & Wagner, D. J. (2013). Exploring student difficulties with pressure in a fluid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789675
Hake, R. (2002). Lessons from the physics education reform effort. Ecology and Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00286-050228
Haris, A., Martawijaya, M. A., Dahlan, A., Yulianti, E., & Nua, M. T. P. (2024). Analysis of critical thinking skills of high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v12i1.12677
Haryono, H. E., Aini, K. N., Samsudin, A., & Siahaan, P. (2020). The implementation of cognitive conflict learning strategy in efforts to reduce heat misconception in junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i3.3950
Irawan, I. D. A., Indraloka, R. M., Basri, N. A., Salmah, U., & Parno. (2025). Analysis of concept understanding test items on static fluid material using rasch model. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i1.15687
Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Peraturan menteri pendidikan, kebudayan, riset, dan teknologi Nomor 032/H/KR/2024. Kemdikbud.
Kokkonen, T., & Schalk, L. (2021). One instructional sequence fits all? a conceptual analysis of the applicability of concreteness fading in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology education. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09581-7
Kuntara, I. P. R., & Mansyur, J. (2022). Analisis kesulitan konsep fluida statis siswa kelas XI MIA 2 SMA negeri 2 Sigi. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 10(3), 48–52.
Maison., Tanti., Kurniawan, D. A., Sukarni, W., Erika., & Hoyi, R. (2021). Assessing students’ attitudes towards physics through the application of inquiry and jigsaw cooperative learning models in high schools. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 439-450. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14426a
Mishra, P., Singh, U., Pandey, C. M., Mishra, P., & Pandey, G. (2019). Application of student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(4), 407-411. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_94_19
Nadrah, N. (2023). The Influence of the jigsaw cooperative learning model and learning motivation on student science learning outcomes. International Journal Of Humanities Education And Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(2), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.622
Nazariani, S., & Zainuddin. (2024). Implementasi model Cocoaer untuk meningkatan pemahaman konsep fisika siswa pada pelaksanaan kurikulum merdeka. Skripsi. FKIP, Universitas Syiah Kuala. https://etd.usk.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=142677
Nazim, M., Alzubi, A. A. F., & Fakih, A. H. (2024). EFL teachers’ student-centered pedagogy and assessment practices: challenges and solutions. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(1), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.21142
Rizki, E. (2021). Peningkatan pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi alat optik dengan penerapan model Cocoaer. Electronic Theses and Dissertation: Universitas Syiah Kuala. https://etd.usk.ac.id/index.php/index.php?p=show_detail&id=94827
Royani, S. N. M., Sutopo., Hidayat., & Parno. (2025). Research trends in physics learning strategies : A systematic literature review addressing students’ conceptual understanding difficulties in kinematics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10047
Safrizal, A. (2021). Penggunaan model Cocoaer untuk mencegah potensi miskonsepsi siswa pada topik listrik statis. Skripsi. FKIP, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh. https://etd.usk.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=92087&keywords=
Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i9/4593
Soeharto, S., & Csapó, B. (2021). Evaluating item difficulty patterns for assessing student misconceptions in science across physics, chemistry, and biology concepts. Heliyon, 7(11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08352
Souza, A. S. C. D., & Debs, L. (2024). Concepts, innovative technologies, learning approaches and trend topics in education 4.0: A scoping literature review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100902
Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukarelawan, M. I., Indratno, T. K., & Ayu, S. M. (2024). N-gain vs stacking: Analisis perubahan abilitas peserta didik dalam desain one group pretest-posttet. Surya Cahaya.
Sulistiyowati, W., & Astuti, C. C. (2017). Buku ajar statistika dasar. Umsida Press https://doi.org/10.21070/2017/978-979-3401-73-7
Suranto & Nurlaela, S. (2021). Entrepreneurship learning based on business model canvas creates competitive advantage. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 1–10.
Tang, C. W., Shi, M. J., & de Guzman, A. B. (2022). Lecturer teaching styles and student learning involvement in large classes: a Taiwan case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1852913
Thompson, C. B. (2009). Descriptive data analysis. Air Medical Journal, 28(2), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2008.12.001
Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657
Wangchuk, D., Wangdi, D., Tshomo, S., & Zangmo, J. (2023). Exploring students’ perceived difficulties of learning physics. Educational Innovation and Practice, 6, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17102/eip.6.2023.03
Wicaksono, S. R., Bukifan, D., & Kusairi, S. (2019). Pemahaman konsep fluida statis siswa SMA dan kesulitan yang dialami. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 7(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v7i1.22380
Wijaya, C. P., Handayanto, S. K., & Muhardjito. (2016). The diagnosis of senior high school class x mia b students misconceptions about hydrostatic pressure concept using three-tier. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V5I1.5784
Yuliawati, N. P. F., Rati, N. W., & Suranata, K. (2020). Make a match learning model assisted with picture media improve students’ reading skills. Journal of Education Technology, 4(3), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i3.26956
Zainuddin. (2016). Cocoaer model development in preventing students misconception on dynamic electricity material in senior high school. Proceedings of International Research Clinic & Scientific Publications of Educational Technology, 1(2), 362–372.
Zainuddin., Mujakir., Ibrahim, M., Jatmiko, B., Halim, A., & Yusrizal. (2020). Model of Cocoaer as alternative learning to prevent the potential misconceptions of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012126
Zakirman., Widiasih, W., Sukmayadi, D., Aprianti, R., & Nadiyyah, K. (2023). A new pattern to improving student physics learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7439–7444. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3324
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
