The Effect of Implementing the CoCoAER and Jigsaw Learning Models on Enhancing Students' Understanding of Concepts in Static Fluid

Zainuddin Zainuddin, Saiful Saiful, Sanusi Sanusi

Abstract


The increasing complexity of physics learning in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era demands innovative pedagogical strategies to address students’ conceptual difficulties, particularly in abstract topics like static fluid. Misconceptions about hydrostatic pressure remain prevalent due to traditional, non-contextual instructional approaches. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two cooperative learning models CoCoAER and Jigsaw in improving students’ conceptual understanding of static fluid and to examine students’ perceptions of both methods. A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group was applied to 90 eleventh-grade students at MAN 3 Banda Aceh, divided into CoCoAER, Jigsaw, and conventional lecture groups. Data were collected through pre-and post-tests and student response questionnaires. Results from ANOVA and N-Gain analysis indicated that the CoCoAER model significantly outperformed both the Jigsaw and lecture models (p < 0.05), with 73.3% of students showing high improvement and an average post-test score of 86. Students' satisfaction also favored CoCoAER, with 96% indicating a “very satisfied” rating, compared to 50% and 40% for Jigsaw and conventional methods, respectively. The novelty of this study lies in applying the CoCoAER model to fluid dynamics, integrating contextual learning, collaboration, and error anticipation strategies. In conclusion, the CoCoAER model offers a highly effective and student-centered approach to teaching static fluid, contributing to the reduction of misconceptions and enhancing physics learning outcomes.

Keywords


CoCoAER; concept understanding; jigsaw learning; static fluid; student satisfaction level

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afrianti, S., Novita, N., Ginting, F. W., Syafrizal, S., & Zahara, S. R. (2022). Development of stem-based lkpd with guided inquiry design to improve student’s science process skills. Radiasi : Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 15(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v15i2.2289

Alatas, F., & Astuti, W. (2019). Developing simple teaching aids on static fluid material as a learning media for physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v7i2.1749

Al-shehri, E. K., & Alaudan, R. (2024). Teacher-centered or student-centered learning approach to promote learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 20(1), 47–51.

Amalissholeh, N., Sutrio, S., Rokhmat, J., & Gunada, I. W. (2023). Analisis kesulitan belajar peserta didik pada pembelajaran fisika di SMAN 1 Kediri. Empiricism Journal, 4(2), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v4i2.1387

Ambon, J., Alias, B. S., Komariah, A., & Mansor, A. N. (2024). The impact of continuous professional development on teaching quality: a systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(6), 3838-3847. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.30427

Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2019). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed.). In Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.366

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimentall designs for research. In Handbook of research on teaching; Chicago: Rand McNally.

Cuppen, E. (2012). A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy. Research Policy, 41(3), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2011.12.006

Damayanti, I., & Rudyatmi, E. (2020). The effectiveness of jigsaw type cooperative model assisted by kahoot media towards student interest and learning outcomes at SMA negeri 1 Sokaraja. Journal of Biology Education, 9(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v9i2.36476

Darsan. (2022). Improving student interests and learning outcomes with the jigsaw type cooperative learning model approach in Al Madinah elementary school students, Jember. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 6(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.31537/jeti.v6i1.1332

Díez, F., Villa, A., López, A. L., & Iraurgi, I. (2020). Impact of quality management systems in the performance of educational centers: Educational policies and management processes. Heliyon, 6(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03824

Fajri, M., Zainuddin., Hamid, A., & Syukri, M. (2022). Peningkatan pemahaman konsep melalui model CoCoAER berbasis scientific approach pada siswa SMPN 1 Darussalam. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Humaniora, X(2), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.32672/jsa.v10i2.4077

Goszewski, M., Moyer, A., Bazan, Z., & Wagner, D. J. (2013). Exploring student difficulties with pressure in a fluid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789675

Hake, R. (2002). Lessons from the physics education reform effort. Ecology and Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00286-050228

Haris, A., Martawijaya, M. A., Dahlan, A., Yulianti, E., & Nua, M. T. P. (2024). Analysis of critical thinking skills of high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v12i1.12677

Haryono, H. E., Aini, K. N., Samsudin, A., & Siahaan, P. (2020). The implementation of cognitive conflict learning strategy in efforts to reduce heat misconception in junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i3.3950

Irawan, I. D. A., Indraloka, R. M., Basri, N. A., Salmah, U., & Parno. (2025). Analysis of concept understanding test items on static fluid material using rasch model. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i1.15687

Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Peraturan menteri pendidikan, kebudayan, riset, dan teknologi Nomor 032/H/KR/2024. Kemdikbud.

Kokkonen, T., & Schalk, L. (2021). One instructional sequence fits all? a conceptual analysis of the applicability of concreteness fading in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology education. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09581-7

Kuntara, I. P. R., & Mansyur, J. (2022). Analisis kesulitan konsep fluida statis siswa kelas XI MIA 2 SMA negeri 2 Sigi. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 10(3), 48–52.

Maison., Tanti., Kurniawan, D. A., Sukarni, W., Erika., & Hoyi, R. (2021). Assessing students’ attitudes towards physics through the application of inquiry and jigsaw cooperative learning models in high schools. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 439-450. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14426a

Mishra, P., Singh, U., Pandey, C. M., Mishra, P., & Pandey, G. (2019). Application of student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(4), 407-411. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_94_19

Nadrah, N. (2023). The Influence of the jigsaw cooperative learning model and learning motivation on student science learning outcomes. International Journal Of Humanities Education And Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(2), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.622

Nazariani, S., & Zainuddin. (2024). Implementasi model Cocoaer untuk meningkatan pemahaman konsep fisika siswa pada pelaksanaan kurikulum merdeka. Skripsi. FKIP, Universitas Syiah Kuala. https://etd.usk.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=142677

Nazim, M., Alzubi, A. A. F., & Fakih, A. H. (2024). EFL teachers’ student-centered pedagogy and assessment practices: challenges and solutions. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(1), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.21142

Rizki, E. (2021). Peningkatan pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi alat optik dengan penerapan model Cocoaer. Electronic Theses and Dissertation: Universitas Syiah Kuala. https://etd.usk.ac.id/index.php/index.php?p=show_detail&id=94827

Royani, S. N. M., Sutopo., Hidayat., & Parno. (2025). Research trends in physics learning strategies : A systematic literature review addressing students’ conceptual understanding difficulties in kinematics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10047

Safrizal, A. (2021). Penggunaan model Cocoaer untuk mencegah potensi miskonsepsi siswa pada topik listrik statis. Skripsi. FKIP, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh. https://etd.usk.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=92087&keywords=

Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i9/4593

Soeharto, S., & Csapó, B. (2021). Evaluating item difficulty patterns for assessing student misconceptions in science across physics, chemistry, and biology concepts. Heliyon, 7(11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08352

Souza, A. S. C. D., & Debs, L. (2024). Concepts, innovative technologies, learning approaches and trend topics in education 4.0: A scoping literature review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100902

Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sukarelawan, M. I., Indratno, T. K., & Ayu, S. M. (2024). N-gain vs stacking: Analisis perubahan abilitas peserta didik dalam desain one group pretest-posttet. Surya Cahaya.

Sulistiyowati, W., & Astuti, C. C. (2017). Buku ajar statistika dasar. Umsida Press https://doi.org/10.21070/2017/978-979-3401-73-7

Suranto & Nurlaela, S. (2021). Entrepreneurship learning based on business model canvas creates competitive advantage. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 1–10.

Tang, C. W., Shi, M. J., & de Guzman, A. B. (2022). Lecturer teaching styles and student learning involvement in large classes: a Taiwan case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1852913

Thompson, C. B. (2009). Descriptive data analysis. Air Medical Journal, 28(2), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2008.12.001

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

Wangchuk, D., Wangdi, D., Tshomo, S., & Zangmo, J. (2023). Exploring students’ perceived difficulties of learning physics. Educational Innovation and Practice, 6, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17102/eip.6.2023.03

Wicaksono, S. R., Bukifan, D., & Kusairi, S. (2019). Pemahaman konsep fluida statis siswa SMA dan kesulitan yang dialami. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 7(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v7i1.22380

Wijaya, C. P., Handayanto, S. K., & Muhardjito. (2016). The diagnosis of senior high school class x mia b students misconceptions about hydrostatic pressure concept using three-tier. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V5I1.5784

Yuliawati, N. P. F., Rati, N. W., & Suranata, K. (2020). Make a match learning model assisted with picture media improve students’ reading skills. Journal of Education Technology, 4(3), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i3.26956

Zainuddin. (2016). Cocoaer model development in preventing students misconception on dynamic electricity material in senior high school. Proceedings of International Research Clinic & Scientific Publications of Educational Technology, 1(2), 362–372.

Zainuddin., Mujakir., Ibrahim, M., Jatmiko, B., Halim, A., & Yusrizal. (2020). Model of Cocoaer as alternative learning to prevent the potential misconceptions of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012126

Zakirman., Widiasih, W., Sukmayadi, D., Aprianti, R., & Nadiyyah, K. (2023). A new pattern to improving student physics learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7439–7444. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3324




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17435

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View JPF Stats

   Free counters!

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.