Konsepsi dan Miskonsepsi Siswa, Mahasiswa Calon Guru, dan Guru pada Topik Cahaya dalam Pembelajaran Fisika

Andi Sri Astika Wahyuni

Abstract


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memperoleh gambaran mengenai berbagai konsepsi dan miskonsepsi yang ada pada siswa, mahasiswa calon guru fisika, dan guru fisika terkait konsep cahaya dalam pembelajaran fisika. Pengumpulan data pada penelitian ini yaitu dengan melakukan analisis terhadap 25 artikel tentang gambaran konsepsi siswa, mahasiswa calon guru, dan guru fisika tentang konsep cahaya dalam pembelajaran fisika. Hasil penelitian ini adalah gambaran konsepsi siswa, mahasiswa calon guru, dan guru fisika tentang konsep cahaya dalam pembelajaran fisika yang dapat menjadi informasi awal untuk mengembangkan penelitian berkelanjutan berupa program pembelajaran atau program perkuliahan untuk meremediasi miskonsepsi yang dimiliki siswa.

Kata kunci: Konsepsi, Miskonsepsi, Pembelajaran Fisika, Konsep Cahaya.

 

The purpose of this study is to obtain a description of the various conceptions and misconceptions in students, physics teacher candidates, and physics teachers about concept of light in physics learning. The data collection in this research is by analyzing 25 articles about the concept of student's conception, student of teacher candidate, and physics teacher about light concept in physics learning. The result of this research is a description of student conception, student of teacher candidate, and physics teacher about light concept in physics learning which can be preliminary information to develop continuous research in the form of learning program or lecture program to remediate misconception owned by students.

Keywords: Conception, Misconception, Physical Learning, Concept of Light.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainsworth, S. 1999. The Functions of Multiple Representations. Computers and Education , 33, 131-152.

Angell, C., Guttersrud, ψ., Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching . Science Education, 88, 683-706.

Angell, C.O. Guttersrud, and EK. Henriksen. 2007. Multiple representations as a framework for a modelling approach to physics education. Department of Physics, University of Oslo, NORWAY, and Per Morten Kind, School of Education, Durham University, UK.

Anderson, D. dan Nashon, S. (2006). “Predators of Knowledge Construction: Interpreting Students’ Metacognition in an Amusement Park Physics Program”. Wiley InterScience, 298-320.

Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu. C, & Moseley. C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconception about global warming, green house effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education 34(11), 1667-1686.

Ashworth, P. & Lucas, U. (2000) Achieving Empathy and Engagement: a practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education. 25(3), 295-308.

Aydin. 2012. Remediation of Misconceptions About Geometric Optics Using Conceptual Change Texts. Journal of Education Research and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 1(1), pp. 001-012.

Ayyildiz, Y., & Tarhan. L. (2012). The effective concepts on students’ understanding of chemical reactions and energy. H.U Journal of Education 42, 72-83.

Campbell, J,. (2007). Using Metacogs to Collaborate with Students to Improve Teaching and Learning in Physics.

Creswell & Clark. 2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. USA: SAGE publication, Inc.

Daud, N.S.N., Karim, M.M.A., Hassan, S.W.N.W., & Rahman, N.A. (2015). Misconception and difficulties in introductory physics among high school and university students: an overview in mechanics. EDUCATUM- Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Vol.2(1): 34-47.

Fredlund, Airey, & Linder. 2012. Exploring The Role Of Physics Representation: an Illustrative Example From Students Sharing Knowledge About Refraction. European Journal of Physics. 33 657-666.

Goldin, G.A. 2002. Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem Solving. Dalam L.D English (Ed). Handbook of International research in Mathematics Education (IRME). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Grigorovitch. 2014. Children’s Misconceptions and Conceptual Change in physics Education: The Concept of Light. Journal of Advances In Natural Sciences Vol. 1, No.1 (2014).

Gurel, and Eryilmaz. 2013. A Content Analysis of Physics Textbooks as a Probable Sources of Misconceptions

in Geometric Optics. Journal of Education 28(2), 234-245.

Hadzibegovic & Slisko. 2013. Changing University Students’ Alternative Conceptions of Optics By Active Learning. CEPS Journal Vol.3.

Halim, L., Yong, T.K., Meerah, T.S.M. (2014). Overcoming students’ misconceptions on forces in equilibrium: an axtion research study. Creative Education 5: 1032-1042.

Halliday. David. Robert, Resnick. 1996. Fisika Jilid 2; Diterjemahkan Oleh Pantur Silaban Ph.D dan Drs.Edwin Sucipto. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Heller, P., & K. Heller. (1999). Problem-Solving Labs, in Cooperative Group Problem Solving in Physics, Research Report. University of Minnesota.

Hung et al. 2014. Learning With The Body: An Embodiment-Based Learning Strategy Enhances Performance of Comprehending Fundamental Optics. Interacting With Computers, Vol. 26 No.4.

John, Molepo, & Chirwa. 2015. Exploring Grade 11 Learners’ Conceptual Undestanding of Refraction: A South African Case Study. International Journal Education Science, 10 (3): 391-398.

Jones and Zollman. 2014. Understanding Vision: Students’ Use of Light and Optics Resources. Europan Journal of Physics. 35, 055023 (17pp).

Kaur 2012. Drawing Insights from Cognitive Science for a Strengthened Teacher Preparation : Learning from Optics.. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), Volume 3, Issue 2.

Kaya, Serap Sengoren. 2014. “Prospective Physics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations for Solving The Image Formation Problems”. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol.13, No.3, 2014: 59-74.

Lee, Ha, & Park. 2012. Middle School Students’ Knowledge State Analysis about Light. J Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu, Vol.32, No.32, No.8, pp 1345-1355.

Lin, Guo, & Hsu. 2011. To Design and Development of A Context-Rich, Photo-Based Online Testing to Assess Students’ Science Learning. US-China Education Review A 1 22-30.

Lucas, U. (2000). Worlds apart: students' experiences of learning introductory accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(4), 479-504.

Lucas, U. (2001). Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study. Accounting Education, 10(2), 161-184.

Lucas, U. (2002) Uncertainties and contradictions: lecturers' conceptions of teaching introductory accounting. British Accounting Review. 34(3), 183-204.

Lucas, U. (2011) Reflection: what is its role in ‘learning to be a professional’?. Brunel University.

Mumba, Mbewe, & Chabalengula. 2015. Elementary School Teachers’ Familiarity, Conceptual Knowledge, and Interest in Light. International Journal of Science Education Vol.37, No.2, 185-209.

Novak & Gowin. 1984. Learning How To Learn. Cambridge: University Press.

Odabasi and Sengoren. 2014. Physics Candidate Teachers’ Alternative Concepts about Image and Shadow Formation and Opinions about High School Students’ Alternative Concepts on These Topics. Balkan Physics Letters, blp, 22, 221005, PP. 43-59.

Ornek. F., Robinson. W. R., Haugan. M. P,. (2008). What makes physics difficult?. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(1), 30-34.

Ouattara & Boudaone. 2012. Teaching and Learning in Geometrical Optics in Burkina Faso Third From Classes: Presentation and Analysis od Class Observations Data

and Students’ Performance. Frederic. British Journal of Science Vol.5 (1).

Ozcan. 2015. Investigating Students’ Mental Models about The Nature of Light in Different Contexts. Europan Journal of Physics.

Rosengrant, D., E. Etkina and AV. Heuvelen. 2007. An Overview of Recent Research on Multiple Representations.Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey GSE, 10 Seminary Place, New Brunswick NJ, 08904

Sengoren. 2014. Prospective Physics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations for Solving The Image Formation Problems. Journal of Baltic Science Education ISSN 1648-3898.

Srisawasdi,. Kroothkeaw. 2014. Supporting Students’ Conceptual Development of Light Refraction by Simulation-based Open Inquiry with Dual-Situated Learning Model. J. Comput. Educ. 1 (1): 49-79.

Srisawasdi & Kroothkeaw. 2014. Supporting students’ conceptual development of light refraction by simulation-based open inquiry with dual-situated learning model. J Comput.Educ. 1(1):49-79.

Stein, M., Larrabee, T.G., & Barman, C.R. (2008). A study of common beliefs and misconceptions in physical science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, Vol 20(2): 1-11.

Taale. 2013. Remediating Some Learning Difficulties of L200 Science Education Students of Modibbo Adama University of Technology in Some Physics Concepts Using Multiple Representations. International Journal of Education and Practice (3):26-43.

Taslidere & Eryilmaz. 2015. Assessment of Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions in Geometrical Optics Via a Three-Tier Misconception. Baltin University Journal of Faculty of Education Volume 4, Issue 1, p.269-289, June 2015.

Tural. 2015. Cross-Grade Comparison of Students’ Conceptual Understanding with Lenses in Geometric Optics. Science Education International Vol. 26, Issue 3, 325-343.

Uzun, Alev, & Karal. 2013. A cross-age Study of an Understanding of Light and Sight Concepts in Physics. Science Education International Vol.24, Issue 2, 129-149.

Wendersee, Mintzes, & Novak. 1994. Research on Alternative Conceptions in Science. Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, eds. Dorothy L. Gabel. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v6i3.1503

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View JPF Stats

   Free counters!

Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.