Resources Siswa SMA tentang Konsep Gaya Archimedes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v6i3.1438
Abstract
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap resouces yang diaktivasi siswa ketika menjawab soal terkait gaya apung. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei dengan instrumen tes 20 soal pilihan ganda beralasan pada topik fluida statis dan didukung dengan wawancara. Namun dalam artikel ini dibahas 1 soal terkait gaya Archimedes. Penelitian dilakukan pada 39 siswa kelas XI SMAN 5 Jambi. Hasil yang diperoleh menunjukkan ide naive terkait gaya apung. Ide tersebut berasal dari resource berupa “benda akan bergerak naik jika gaya ke atas lebih besar”.
Kata kunci: Resources, gaya Archimedes
This article aims to reveal students-activated resouces when they are solving the buoyancy force questions. This study used survey method with 20 MCQs reasoned on static fluid and supported by interviews. But in this article discussed a question related to buoyancy force. The study was conducted on 39 students of grade XI SMAN 5 Jambi. The results obtained show the naive-related idea of buoyancy force. The idea comes from a resource in the form of " the object will move up if the upward force is bigger than downward force".
Keywords: Resources, buoyancy forceReferences
Anderson, B. 1990. Pupils’ Conceptions Of Matter And Its Transformations (Age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18: 53-85.
Baser, M. 2006. Fostering Conceptual Change By Cognitive Conflict Based Instrustion OnStudents’ Understanding of Heat And Temperature Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 2(2): 96-114.
Bektasli, B. & Cakmakci, G. 2011. Consistency of students’ ideas about the concept of rate across different contexts, Education and Science, 36(162): 273-287.
Berek, F. X., Sutopo, & Munzil. 2016. Pentingnya Pengintegrasian Hukum Newton dalam Pembelajaran Gaya Apung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Besson, U. 2004. Students' Conceptions of Fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (14): 1683—1714.
Carey, S. 2000. Science Education as Conceptual Change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21 (1):13—19.
Clement, J. 1982. Students’ Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50 (1): 66—71.
diSessa, A. 2015. Alternative Conceptions and P-Prims. Encyclopedia of Science Education, 34—37.
diSessa, A. A. & Sherin, B. L. 1998. What changes in conceptual change?, International Journal of Science Education, 20(10): 1155-1191.
diSessa, A. A. 1993. Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and instruction, 10 (2-3):105—225.
diSessa, A. A. 2008. A bird's-eye view of the" pieces" vs" coherence" controversy (from the" pieces" side of the fence"). In International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35—60).
diSessa, A. A. Gillespie, N & Esterly, J. 2004. Coherence vs. fragmentation in the development of the concept of force, Cognitive Science, 28(6): 843-900.
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. 2014. Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119.
Dufresne, R. J. Leonard, W. J. & Gerace, W. J. 2002. Making sense of students’ answers to multiple choice questions, Physics Teacher, 40(3): 174-180.
Fisher, K. M. 1985. A misconception in biology: amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 22(1): 53-62.
Gilbert, J. K. & Watts, D. M. 1983. Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectivein science education. Studies in Science Education, 10(1): 61-98.
Hammer, D. 1996. Misconceptions or p-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5 (2):97—127.
Hammer, D. 2000. Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52-S59.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, D. 1992. Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30: 141.
McCloskey, M., & Kohl, D. 1983. Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9 (1): 146.
McCloskey, M., Washburn, A., & Felch, L. 1983. Intuitive physics: The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9 (4):636.
Minogue, J., & Borland, D. 2016. Investigating students’ ideas about buoyancy and the influence of haptic feedback. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25 (2):187—202.
Soyibo, K. 1993. Some sources of student’s misconceptions in biology: A review. In Third Misconceptions Seminar Proceedings. The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Publisher Location: Ithaca, NY.
Steinberg, R. N. & Sabella, M. S. 1997. Performance on multiple-choice diagnostics and complementary exam problems, Physics Teacher, 35(3): 150-155.
Sutarja, M. C., Sutopo, & Latifah, E. 2017. Resources Siswa tentang Konsep Gaya Apung melalui Closed-Ended Beralasan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2 (10): 1315-1320.
Taqwa, M. R. A., Hidayat, A., & Sutopo. 2017. Konsistensi Pemahaman Konsep Kecepatan dalam Berbagai Representasi, Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1): 31-39.
Taqwa, M. R. A., Hidayat, A., & Sutopo. 2017. Deskripsi Penggunaan Program Resitasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membangun Free-Body Diagrams (FBDs), Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadaluko, 5(1): 52-58.
Taqwa, M. R. A., & Faizah, R. 2016. Perlunya Program Resitasi dalam Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Dinamika Partikel Mahasiswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA ke-1, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Thornton, R. K. 1998. Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion ConceptualEvaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4): 338-352.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
