THE EFFECT OF SERVICE QUALITY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AT PT. BANK MANDIRI (PERSERO) TBK. SIDRAP DISTRICT BRANCH

Anastasia D'Ornay, Maskur Hasan

Abstract


This study aims to determine and analyze how much influence service quality has on customer satisfaction at PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Sidrap District Branch. The analytical method used in this study is the method of observation, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation with the method of determining the sample used as many as 378 samples, the analytical method used is multiple linear analysis using SPSS version 20. The results show that the strength of the relationship is simultaneously between reliability ( X1), responsiveness (X2), assurance (X3), empathy (X4), and physical evidence (X5) on customer satisfaction (Y) at PT.Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Sidrap District Branch obtained the value of r = 0.299. This value shows a very strong positive relationship simultaneously between the variables of reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and physical evidence on customer satisfaction of PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Sidrap District Branch. The contribution or determination given by the variables of reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and physical evidence on customer satisfaction is D = (0.299)2 × 100% = 89%. This means that the five independent variables contribute an influence of 89% on customer satisfaction, 11% is influenced by other variables that affect customer satisfaction not included in the study. The regression equation is as follows: Y = 7.951 + 0.066X1 + 0.210X2 + 0.058X3 + 0.119X4 + 0.107X5 + 1.858. The F test shows Farithmetic > Ftable then there is a simultaneous significant effect between reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and physical evidence on customer satisfaction at PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Sidrap District Branch.


Keywords


Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, Physical evidence, and customer satisfaction.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aditya Nur Pratama, 2016, Skripsi, Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Razer Brothers,Tanah Abang Jakarta Pusat, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Anwar. 1991. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia, PT.Reflika Aditama, Bandung.

Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Refika Aditama, Bandung

, 2009, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT.Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Dessler. 1997, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, PT.Prenhalindo, Jakarta.

Foster, Bill. 2001. Pembinaan Untuk Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan, PPM : Jakarta.

Handoko, T.Hani. 2011. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Kartono, Kartini. 2000. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Rajawali Jakarta.

Malayu SP Hasibuan.2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, PT.Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Mangkuprawira, Syafri, 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya. Orasi Ilmiah Guru Besar Tetap.

Nasution S. 2006. Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta

Simamora. 1995. Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. BPFE, Yoyakarta.

Soedarmayanti. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Siagian, Sondang P. 1998. Pengembangan Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia di Indonesia. Ganesha, Bandung.

Sarwono P. 1998. Pengukuran Efektifitas Kerja Pegawai. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.

Tri Widari, 2016, Jurnal, Pengaruh disiplin dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai.(Studi pada Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta), Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Wirawana. 2001. Kriteria Menilai Kinerja Organisasi Pelayanan Publik. Joyo Wisesa. Bandung.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/profitability.v5i1.6409

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
Jurnal ilmu Manajemen Profitability Is Licenced Under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License