Audit Committee, ESG Score, and Firm Value: An Information Systems Audit Perspective for Automotive Companies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/xzpn3y32
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG); Firm Value; Audit Committee; Information Systems Audit; Corporate Governance; Automotive Industry
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores on firm value and examines the moderating role of the audit committee from an information systems audit perspective in Indonesian automotive companies. Using an explanatory quantitative approach, this research employs firm-year secondary data from automotive sector firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange over the 2021–2023 period. Firm value is measured using Tobin’s Q, ESG performance is proxied by composite ESG scores, and the audit committee is represented by its size as an internal governance mechanism. Data are analyzed using multiple linear regression and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) with SPSS 27. The findings reveal that ESG scores do not have a significant effect on firm value, indicating that capital market participants have not fully internalized ESG information as a primary determinant of valuation within the Indonesian automotive sector. In contrast, the audit committee demonstrates a positive and significant effect on firm value, highlighting the importance of effective internal monitoring mechanisms in enhancing market confidence. Furthermore, the interaction between ESG scores and the audit committee is negative and statistically insignificant, suggesting that the audit committee does not strengthen the ESG–firm value relationship but functions more as a screening mechanism that ensures the credibility and reliability of ESG information produced by corporate information systems. This study contributes to the ESG and corporate governance literature by integrating an information systems audit perspective, emphasizing that ESG effectiveness as a value-relevant signal depends on the quality of internal oversight and data integrity. Practically, the findings imply that strengthening audit committees and ESG-related information systems is crucial for improving ESG credibility in emerging capital markets.
References
Adnan, M. A., Al-Ahdal, W. M., Almaqtari, F. A., Sahu, T. N., & Bajaher, M. S. (2026). Audit committee characteristics, sustainability reporting, and firm performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 52, 100562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2025.100562
Alqatamin, R. M. (2022). Audit committee effectiveness and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 30(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-06-2021-0123
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2022). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00806-5
Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2022). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(3), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-06-2021-0136
Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). ESG performance and firm value: Evidence from emerging markets. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.05.002
Bamahros, H. M., Shukeri, S. N., & Al-Duais, S. D. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm value: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(4), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-02-2021-0060
Boulouta, I., & Pitelis, C. N. (2022). ESG, stakeholder capitalism, and sustainable value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04883-1
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2022). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 48(5), 1148–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211046835
Desai, R. (2024). ESG performance and firm valuation: A global perspective. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2023.2198765
Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multinationals. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2021). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1726802
García-Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & Ruiz-Barbadillo, E. (2021). Determinants of ESG assurance: The role of the audit committee. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(4), 795–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04320-7
García-Sánchez, I. M., Raimo, N., Marrone, A., & Vitolla, F. (2022). Audit committee attributes and sustainability reporting quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1286–1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2276
Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2023). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3158
Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Hendrawaty, E., & Elamer, A. A. (2021). Audit committee effectiveness and firm performance. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-09-2020-0283
Li, Y., Lau, C. K. M., & Ng, L. (2025). ESG performance and market valuation: New international evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, 102546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.102546
Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., & De Silva, K. M. (2022). ESG risk disclosure and firm value in emerging markets. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 1095–1117. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2021-0102
Maji, S. G., & Tiwari, A. K. (2025). Corporate governance and ESG disclosure quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 401, 136868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136868
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2021). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(3), 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2019-3882
Negara, S. D., Ishak, Z., & Priambodo, D. (2024). ESG disclosure and firm value in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-05-2023-0089
Nguyen, T. H., Phan, H. T., & Tran, N. H. (2023). ESG performance and firm value: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Sustainability, 15(6), 5123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065123
Olivia, D., Riswandari, E., Nelson, S. P., & Jeninfer, A. (2025). ESG performance and firm value: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 12(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2025.vol12.no2.0233
Velte, P. (2023). Audit committees and sustainability reporting: A meta-analysis. Accounting Research Journal, 36(3), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-01-2022-0024
Xie, Y. (2024). Digital ESG indicators and sustainable firm growth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 139893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139893
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Profitability agree to the following terms:
Copyright of the articles remains with the authors.
Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to:
Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format)
Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material)
as long as they give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Non-commercial use only.
Authors are permitted to:
Distribute their published work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to a class website or institutional archive).
For permissions to use the content published in this journal beyond the scope of the license (e.g., commercial purposes), please contact the editorial office via the journal email.
License Details:
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
