Analyzing Switching Intention to Fintech-Based Crowdlending Services: A Push-Pull-Mooring Model

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/p7rnap76

Authors

  • Dimas Bagus Wiranatakusuma Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Virgiawan Andhika Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Anggi Aprizal Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ghalieb Mutig Idroes Research Fellow at Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Fintech, Crowdlending, Switching Intention, Push-Pull-Mooring, Student Behavior

Abstract

The rapid growth of financial technology has transformed financial services, particularly through fintech-based crowdlending platforms that offer alternatives to conventional banking. Despite their potential advantages, switching from traditional banks to crowdlending remains limited, even among digitally literate university students. Prior research has focused primarily on adoption intention, with limited attention to the combined roles of dissatisfaction, attractiveness, and behavioral constraints in shaping switching decisions. This study examined the determinants of switching intention to fintech-based crowdlending using the Push–Pull–Mooring framework. A quantitative design was employed, and primary data were collected through structured questionnaires from 267 undergraduate economics students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling to test measurement validity and structural relationships. The findings revealed that pull factors relative advantage, perceived security, and ease of use—positively and significantly influenced switching intention (β = 0.179; p < 0.01). Push factors, including dissatisfaction with pricing, service quality, and product features, showed no significant effect (β = −0.002; p > 0.05). Mooring factors, such as inertia, affective commitment, and perceived switching costs, exerted a significant negative influence (β = −0.166; p < 0.05). These results indicate that switching intention is driven more by perceived benefits of alternatives than by dissatisfaction, while psychological and transactional barriers remain critical constraints.

References

Adirinekso, G. P., Budiono, S., & Purba, J. T. (2021). Switching Intention of ATM Link to Digital Transactions in Responding Himbara’s Bank New Policy: PPM Framework Perspective. In Proceedings of the Second Asia Pacific International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.

Arnold, L. (2024). Navigating the Dynamics of Digital B2B Platform Ecosystem Emergence and Orchestration. Universitaet Bayreuth (Germany).

Baig, U., Anjum, S., & Hussain, M. (2022). FinTech Past and Future: Ecosystem, Business Model and its Proximate Challenges. Pakistan Business Review, 24(1).

https://doi.org/10.22555/pbr.v24i1.645

Banna, H., Hassan, M. K., & Rashid, M. (2021). Fintech-based financial inclusion and bank risk-taking: Evidence from OIC countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 75, 101447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101447

Cai, J. (2023). Research on the Influencing Factors of Consumer Buying Behavior. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 61, 119–127.

Danladi, S., Prasad, M. S. V., Modibbo, U. M., Ahmadi, S. A., & Ghasemi, P. (2023). Attaining sustainable development goals through financial inclusion: exploring collaborative approaches to Fintech adoption in developing economies. Sustainability, 15(17), 13039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713039

Garad, A., Surwanti, A., Al-Ansi, A. M., Riyadh, H. A., Alfaiza, S. A., & Al Iman, B. (2025). Users' Intentions of Adopting Fintech Services: Analysis of Trust and Attitude Elements. In From Digital Disruption to Dominance: Leveraging FinTech Applications for Sustainable Growth (pp. 103-119). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-608-420251004

Gianni, M., Reitano, A., Fazio, M., Gkimperiti, A., Karanasios, N., & Taylor, D. W. (2023). Food literacy as a resilience factor in response to health-related uncertainty. British Food Journal, 125(3), 1067-1093.

https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2021-1145

Idris, A., Hanafi, M. M., Rahmawati, A., & Surwanti, A. (2023). Impact of Intellectual Capital and risk attitude through financial literacy on business sustainability in Indonesia Batik Smes. Economics-Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 11(2), 113-136.

Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., & Chernev, A. (2022). Marketing management (16th ed.). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003219575

Krismadinata, & Fiandri, D. (2024). Performance evaluation and dynamic characteristics of a self-excited induction generator for pico hydro power plants. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research, 12(1), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.37391/IJEER.120129

Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2022). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 86(4), 69–96.

https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.042

Milne, A., & Parboteeah, P. (2022). The business models and economics of peer-to-peer lending. European Journal of Finance, 28(7), 653–675

Titin, S., Safa’atillah, N., Sulaeman, M. M., & Cahyono, P. (2024). Product development strategy based on local wisdom to strengthen the identity of SMEs during Ramadan. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN, 2)(1), 394–401 https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v2i1.158

Varma, P., Nijjer, S., Sood, K., Grima, S., & Rupeika-Apoga, R. (2022). Thematic analysis of financial technology (Fintech) influence on the banking industry. Risks, 10(10), 186.

https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10100186

Vučinić, M. (2022). Fintech and financial stability potential influence of FinTech on financial stability, risks and benefits. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 11(2), 43–66.

Wicaksana, D. Y., Dewi, H. S. C. P., & Erta, E. (2023). FINTECH for SDGs: Driving economic development through financial innovation. Journal of Digital Business and Innovation Management, 2(2), 126–138.

https://doi.org/10.26740/jdbim.v2i2.57960

Wiranatakusuma, D. B., Wahyudi, A. F., Muttaqin, E. I., & Aprizal, A. (2024). Analysis of switching intention in digital payment services: Case study of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. SHS Web of Conferences, 201, Article 01007. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420101007

Yoon, C., & Lim, D. (2021). Customers’ intentions to switch to internet-only banks: Perspective of the push-pull-mooring model. Sustainability, 13(14), 8062.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148062

Yu, S. Y., & Chen, D. C. (2022). Consumers’ switching from cash to mobile payment under the fear of COVID-19 in Taiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14), 8489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148489

Downloads

Published

2026-02-15