Utilization of Local Resources for the Economy and the Importance of Education for Village Communities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/qpwp6316

Authors

  • Fatolosa Hulu Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli
  • Fanny Corsby Sella Sarumaha Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli
  • Gusman Waruwu Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli
  • Fince Rahmat Yanto Halawa Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli
  • Epafroditus Giawa Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli
  • Trisaeli Hulu Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli
  • Otolisasi Halawa Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli
  • Andreas Meikardo Stevan Duha Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli
  • Yamolala Zega Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nias, Gunungsitoli

Community Service; Local Resource Utilization; Village Empowerment; Education; Rural Economy

Abstract

The utilization of local resources and educational empowerment are essential elements for achieving sustainable rural economic development, yet many villages still face limited capacity to transform local potential into productive economic activities. This study aimed to examine how community service activities integrating local resource utilization and educational awareness can enhance community empowerment and support village economic development. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed through a participatory community service program conducted in Mondrali Village, Idanogawo District, Nias Regency. Participants consisted of village officials, youth representatives, and community members selected purposively. Data were collected through interactive lectures, focus group discussions, role-play simulations, observations, and documentation, and were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns of awareness, participation, and institutional readiness. The results showed three major findings. First, participants demonstrated increased understanding of value-added economic opportunities from natural resources, particularly through agro-processing initiatives. Second, awareness of human and cultural resources improved, reflected in proposals for cultural-based creative activities to support local income generation. Third, institutional readiness strengthened through discussions on establishing a village-owned enterprise to manage community-based businesses. Education emerged as a cross-cutting factor that enhanced motivation, leadership awareness, and collective action toward village development. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that participatory education integrated with local resource optimization serves as an effective initial strategy for sustainable rural empowerment. Practically, the findings provide a community service model that can support inclusive and context-based village economic development policies.

References

Anríquez, G., & Stamoulis, K. (2020). Rural development and poverty reduction: Is agriculture still the key? World Development, 133, 104989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104989

Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2019). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1619249

Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2021). Sustainable development goals and the systems approach to sustainability. Economics, 15(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2021-28

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Duxbury, N., Garrett-Petts, W., & MacLennan, D. (2021). Cultural mapping as a tool for supporting rural creative economies. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.012

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). Education, knowledge capital, and economic growth. The Economics of Education Review, 75, 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.101964

Iskandar, D., Rachman, A., & Nuryakin. (2022). Institutional capacity and rural economic development in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no3.0223

Kumar, A., Singh, R. K., & Modgil, S. (2021). Local resource-based entrepreneurship and rural development. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(3), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-07-2020-0132

Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020). Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation. Land Use Policy, 94, 104537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104537

Nugroho, Y., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2022). Digital transformation and village governance in Indonesia. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101657

Ratten, V. (2020). Entrepreneurship and the COVID-19 crisis: Innovation and resilience in rural contexts. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(4), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-06-2020-0161

Sachs, J. D., Lafortune, G., Kroll, C., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2022). Sustainable development report 2022. Cambridge University Press.

Sharma, R., Shishodia, A., Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Belhadi, A. (2021). Agriculture supply chain risks and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126634

Sulaiman, R., & Davis, K. (2021). The “new extensionist”: Roles and capacities to strengthen extension and advisory services. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1880457

United Nations. (2021). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

Ward, N., Atterton, J., Kim, T., Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., & Thompson, N. (2020). Universities and rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.001

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28