PREPARING INDONESIAN LANGUAGE TEACHERS AS PROFESSIONALS IN THE 5.0 ERA: IMPROVING COMPETENCE THROUGH TRAINING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Rahayu Alfatu Zain Muhammadiyah University of Malang
  • Niswatun Khasanah Muhammadiyah University of Malang
  • Erna Yayuk Muhammadiyah University of Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26618/akzb8783

Keywords:

Pengembangan Guru Bahasa Indonesia, Kompetensi Digital Kontekstual, Society 5.0, Refleksi Profesional

Abstract

The Society 5.0 era demands an educational transformation that places Indonesian language teachers as strategic actors in creating an adaptive, reflective, and technology-based learning ecosystem. In this context, teacher competency development is no longer focused solely on technical skills, but must include digital literacy, pedagogical agency, and scientific engagement. This study aims to explore and synthesize various models of Indonesian language teacher competency development based on five main scientific articles relevant to the Society 5.0 era. The method used is a literature study with a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were analyzed using thematic matrix-based content techniques through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and verification. The results of the study identified five dominant models: (1) Adaptive Professionalism Model (Tran Minh), (2) Contextual Digital Competency Model (Grisma et al.), (3) Sustainable Digital Transformation Model (Vorotnykova), (4) Reflective and Collaborative Agency Model (Averina & Kuswandono), and (5) Academic Engagement-Based Development Model (Tias & Tongjean). Each model has contextual advantages, but has not fully answered the complexity of the challenges of the Society 5.0 era in an integrated manner. Therefore, a hybrid approach that integrates the strengths of the five models is recommended as the most effective strategy. Recommendations include: context-based training in the field, strengthening professional reflection, utilizing adaptive technology, and ongoing institutional support. These findings contribute to research on strategies for developing Indonesian language teacher competencies that are more relevant, holistic, and applicable in facing the digital-humanistic era of Society 5.0.

References

Averina, F. E., & Kuswandono, P. (2023). Professional development of Indonesian in-service EFL teachers: Perceived impacts and challenges. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 10(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v10i2.15589

Benjamin, Nyanda, D. K. L. D. (2025). Technology Integration in Classrooms: Evaluating Teachers’ Perceptions of Administrative Support in Tanzanian and Indian Schools. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.35420

Dinçer, S. (2024). Bridging the gap in technology integration in education: An examination of science teachers’ competencies and needs. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(4), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.033

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. HUMANIKA, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075

Gaur, V. (2025). Teacher training in lifelong learning—the importance of digital competence in the encouragement of teaching innovation. The Business and Management Review, 15(03). https://doi.org/10.24052/BMR/V15NU03/ART-24

Grisma Yuli Arta, Wendrizal Wendrizal, & Aulia Almeyda. (2024). Meningkatkan Kopetensi Guru Bahasa Indonesia Melalui Program Pengembangan Profesional. Perspektif : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Bahasa, 2(3), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.59059/perspektif.v2i3.1457

Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (2012). The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. In The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986274

Ickes, S. B., Craig, C., & Heidkamp, R. A. (2020). How do nutrition professionals working in low‐income countries perceive and prioritize actions to prevent wasting? A mixed‐methods study. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13035

Marantika, J., & Tomasouw, J. (2024). Paradigma Baru Pendidikan dan Perkembangannya di Era Society 5.0. German Für Gesellschaft (J-Gefüge), 3(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.30598/jgefuege.3.1.7-12

Minh, N. T. T. (2024). Teacher Professional Development in Education 5.0 (pp. 175–204). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3041-8.ch011

Miszkiewicz, K. (2024). Jak technologie zmieniają rolę nauczyciela? Języki Obce w Szkole, 4(2024), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.47050/jows.2024.4.39-45

Napitupulu, M. H., Muddin, A., Bagiya, B., Diana, S., & Rosyidah, N. S. (2024). Teacher Professional Development in the Digital Age: Strategies for Integrating Technology and Pedagogy. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(10), 2382–2396. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i10.334

Riyanda, A. R., Parma Dewi, I., Jalinus, N., Ahyanuardi, Sagala, M. K., Rinaldi, D., Prasetya, R. A., & Yanti, F. (2025). Digital Skills and Technology Integration Challenges in Vocational High School Teacher Learning. Data and Metadata, 4, 553. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025553

Sabharwal, D., & Mitra, A. (2024). Impact of AI on Student Learning and Teacher Outcomes in Education 5.0 (pp. 293–316). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8191-5.ch012

Sajid, L., Sultan, S., & Ahmed, S. Z. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Practicum in Teachers’ Training Programs in Perspective of Technology. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(4), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i4.945

Schleicher, A. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results. Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals, II. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Tias, S. A., & Tongjean, W. (2022). Teacher professional development in Indonesia: A comparative study with global practices. In Innovation on Education and Social Sciences (pp. 89–95). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003265061-12

Vorotnykova, I. P. (2024). Professional development of teachers in conditions of digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-22

Issue

Section

Artikel