Peer Review Process

Peer reviewers play a vital role in ensuring the quality, integrity, and credibility of scholarly publications. Reviewers are therefore required to adhere to the following ethical principles:

1. Timeliness
   Reviewers must respond to review invitations in a timely manner. If a reviewer is unable to undertake or complete the review within the agreed timeframe, they must promptly notify the editor to avoid unnecessary delays in the editorial process.

2. Competence and Suitability
   Reviewers should accept review assignments only when they possess adequate expertise and subject knowledge relevant to the manuscript, enabling them to provide a thorough and responsible scholarly evaluation.

3. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
   Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that may compromise the objectivity of their assessment. In cases of uncertainty, reviewers are encouraged to consult the editor. Reviewers should decline the review if such conflicts may affect independent judgment.

4. Confidentiality
   All information obtained during the peer review process, including author identity and manuscript content, must be treated as confidential and must not be used for personal advantage or disclosed to third parties without editorial permission.

5. Objectivity and Professional Conduct
   Reviews must be conducted objectively, fairly, and constructively, focusing solely on the academic merit of the manuscript. Personal criticism, demeaning remarks, or unprofessional language are strictly prohibited.