E-Auction Sebagai Instrumen Tata Kelola Kolaboratif: Upaya Peningkatan Akuntabilitas Lelang Barang Miliki Negara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v12i1.21578
e-auction, accountability, state assets, digital governance
Abstract
The management of state assets requires transparency, efficiency, and accountability, particularly in the implementation of auctions for Barang Milik Negara (BMN). The increasing adoption of digital technology has encouraged the use of electronic auction (e-auction) systems to improve public service delivery. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the e-auction system and its contribution to enhancing accountability in BMN auctions at KPKNL Madiun. The research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive design, utilizing data collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. Informants were selected purposively, including auction officials, technical staff, and auction participants. The findings reveal that the e-auction system is implemented through integrated digital stages, including participant registration, auction announcement, bidding process, winner determination, and payment settlement. The system significantly enhances transparency through real-time information access and digital recording of all auction activities, ensuring traceability and auditability. Additionally, the implementation of e-auction improves administrative efficiency and increases public participation, which contributes to more competitive bidding and optimal auction outcomes. However, challenges remain, particularly in terms of limited digital literacy and the need for broader socialization of the system. In conclusion, the e-auction system plays a crucial role in strengthening accountability in BMN auction processes by promoting transparency, efficiency, and wider public access. Despite its positive impact, the effectiveness of the system is influenced by external factors such as user readiness and technological understanding.
References
Anagnoste, S. (2018). Robotic automation process-the operating system for the digital enterprise. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 12(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0007
Anisa, N., Riska, R., Farhan, M. A., & Panaungi, Y. R. (2025). Analisis pelaksanaan pelelangan barang milik negara di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Bisnis dan Ekonomi (JIMBE), 2(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.59971/jimbe.v2i3.394
Cahyariata, A. B., Habibullah, M. R. A., & Haromainy, M. M. A. (2025). Pengembangan aplikasi auction digital berbasis web untuk transparansi dan efisiensi proses lelang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Informatika Bela Negara, 5(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.33005/santika.v5i1.553
Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., & Katok, E. (2006). E-sourcing in procurement: Theory and behavior in reverse auctions with noncompetitive contracts. Management Science, 52(4), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0474
Fakhruddin, D., & Rahman, A. (2025). Peran Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara dalam mewujudkan. Arus: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(3).
Ibidapo-Obe, B. B. (2019). Enhancing horizontal accountability: The key to addressing the conflict of interest loopholes in public procurement in Nigeria [Doctoral dissertation, institution unknown].
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 90/PMK.06/2016 tentang pedoman pelaksanaan lelang dengan penawaran secara tertulis tanpa kehadiran peserta lelang melalui internet. Kementerian Keuangan RI.
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 213/PMK.06/2020. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara.
Landina, P. A. I. (2016). Pelaksanaan lelang atas barang milik daerah melalui internet (e-auction) oleh Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL) Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(2), 1– 18. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/11296
Noviandra, N., Marjo, & Utama, K. (2020). Pelaksanaan lelang online (e-auction) di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL) Kota Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal, 9(2), 403–414.
Ratnaningtyas, E. M., Ramli, Syafruddin, Saputra, E., Suliwati, D., Nugroho, B. T. A., Karimuddin, Aminy, M. H., Saputra, N., Khaidir, & Jahja, A. S. (2023). Research questions
Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M., & Randel, A. (2017). Management (15th ed.).
Siregar, S., & Siregar, S. (2022). Analisis pelaksanaan lelang online (e-auction) di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL) Kota Medan. Khidmatussifa: Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(1), 17– 30.https://doi.org/10.56146/khidmatussifa.v2i1.66
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Taufikkurahman, M., & Hanani, T. (2025). Analisis peran lelang terhadap PNBP tahun 2023 di KPKNL Mataram., 1(2), 476–483.
Waditwar, P. (2025). Transforming government procurement through electronic bidding-A case study on the City of Somerville’s implementation of BidExpress Infotech. Open Journal of Leadership, 14(1), 165– 175. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2025.141007
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
