Quality Assurance System Policy Evaluation Strategy to Increase the Competitiveness of Private Universities

Agus Supriatna, Benyamin Harits, Yaya Mulyana Aziz

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to find out and analyze how the higher education quality assurance system works and to find out and analyze the dimensions of quality assurance system policy evaluation to improve the competitiveness of private tertiary institutions in the city of Bandung. This study uses a descriptive analysis method with a qualitative type and is supported by the SWOT technique. The results of the study show that the implementation of the quality assurance system for Private Higher Education in Bandung City is still not effective, so a policy evaluation is needed through (1) Administrative evaluation by taking into account: Effort evaluation, performance evaluation, adequacy of performance, efficiency evaluation and process evaluation, (2) Judicial evaluation by taking into account: Issues of legal validity, possible violations of the constitution, possible violations of the legal system, possible violations of ethics and state administration rules, (3) Political evaluation by taking into account: Political process in determining policies, acceptance of political constituencies towards public policies, implementation information technology. The results of the policy evaluation in this study then produce recommendation strategies related to the implementation of the Higher Education quality assurance system by the government's standard provisions.


Keywords


implementation strategy; policy evaluation; quality assurance system

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, J. E. (2003). An Introduction. In Public Policy Making. Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company. http://www.kropfpolisci.com/public.policy.anderson.pdf

Dwiyanto, A. (2012). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, Peduli, Inklusif, dan Kolaboratif. Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press.

Dye, T. R. (1981). Understanding Public Policy. New Jersey: Prentice–Hall, Inc.

Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia number, Pub. L. No. 15.

Lester, James P, and Y. S. (2000). Public Policy: An Evolutionary

Approach (2nd ed.). Australia: Wadworth.

Muhiddin, A. (2017). Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik (Studi Kesiapan Desa Menerima Dana Desa di Kabupaten Gowa) (Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar. Diperoleh dari http://eprints.unm.ac.id/4365/

Nugroho, R. D. (2007). Analisis Kebijakan. Jakarta: PT Elekmedia Komputindo.

Pearce, J.A. and Robinson, R. . (2011). Strategic Management Formulation Implementation and Control (Twelfth Ed). New York: Mc. Graw-Hill International.

Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.

Richard D. Bingham, and C. L. F. (1989). Evaluation in Practice: A

Methodological Approach. London: Longmans.

Weiss, C. (1972). Evaluating Action Programs; Readings in Social Action and Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Winarno, B. (2014). Kebijakan Publik: Teori, Proses, dan Studi Kasus. Yogyakarta: Center of Academic Publishing Service (CAPS).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v9i2.10474

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Creative Commons License

Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
View My Stats
 
Flag Counter