Email this article 
Five-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument for Uniform Circular Motion Concepts: Development, Validity, Reliability and Limited Trials
Abstract
Students' understanding on Physics concepts could be different from each other. Based on the conceptual diagnostic test, especially in five-tier format, the students' different understanding can be categorized into several conception levels. One of them is misconception. For example, students consider that all objects moving on a circular trajectory called uniform circular motion (UCM). According to the Physics concept, an object in UCM must meet three criteria: an object travels along a circular path, the radius of the path is always fixed, and the object moves at a constant speed. However, a standardized conceptual diagnostic test instrument in five-tier format is not yet available. This work aims to develop a five-tier diagnostic test instrument for UCM concepts, perform validity and reliability test and use the developed instrument to identify a number of students’ conception level. The research & development method was employed to produce 15 valid and reliable questions. The validity test consisted of internal and external (content and construct empirical) aspects. The internal validity obtained was 88% (very valid). The content aspect, i.e. the false positive=4.95% and the false negative=5.59% both met the criteria <10%. The construct aspect obtained by a Pearson product moment correlation was (5% sig. level). The reliability level of the Alpha Cronbach coefficient shows that the developed instrument was valid and reliable. The limited trial result shows that the students’ conception levels on the UCM concepts was generally lack of knowledge.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustin, R. D., Harijanto, A., & Prastowo, S. H. B. (2018). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Rangkaian Arus Bolak-Balik Menggunakan Four-Tier Test di SMA. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7 (2), 141-146.
Alhinduan, S. R., Kurniawan, Y., & Mulyani, R. (2016). Identifikasi Kuantitas Siswa yang Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Three Tier-Test pada Materi Listrik Dinamis. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 1 (1), 29-31.
https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JIPF/article/view/57/35
Amin, N., Wiendartun, W., & Samsudin, A. (2016). Analisis Intrumen Tes Diagnostik Dynamic-Fluid Conceptual Change Inventory (DFCCI) Bentuk Four-Tier Test pada Beberapa SMA di Bandung Raya. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains (SNIPS) 2016 (pp 570-574). Bandung, Indonesia.
Anam, R. S., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Wu, H. K. (2019). Developing a Five-Tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science: An Example of the Heat Transfer Concepts. Elementary Education Online, 18 (03), 1014-1029.
Annisa, Rizki, Budi Astuti, dan Budi Naini Mindyarto. (2019). Tes Diagnostik Four Tier Untuk Identifikasi Pemahaman Dan Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Gerak Melingkar Beraturan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 5 (1), 25-32. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229493715.pdf
Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Astuti, S. P. (2015). Pengaruh Kemampuan Awal dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5 (1), 68-75.
https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/Formatif/article/view/167/160
Bayuni, T. C., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2018). Identification Misconception Of Primary School Teacher Education Students In Changes Of Matters Using A Five-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013 (1), 012086. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012086/pdf
Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of Cell Division Held by Student Teachers in Biology: A drawing Analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 05 (02), 235- 247. https://academicjournals.org/journal/SRE/article-full-text-pdf/E98624416980
Ermawati, F. U., Anggrayni, S., & Isfara, L. (2019). Misconception Profile of Students in Senior High School IV Sidoarjo East Java in Work and Energy Concepts and The Causes Evaluated Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387 (1), 012062. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012062/pdf.
Fajriyyah, N. S., & Ermawati, F. U (2020). The Validity and Reliability of Five-Tier Conception Diagnostic Test for Kinetic Theory of Gases. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9 (2), 126-132. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/33889/30369.
Farihah, U., & Wildani, A. (2018). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Three Tier Essay Test Item pada Materi Hukum Newton di SMA Negeri 1 Pademawu. Wacana Didaktika, 6 (01), 86-100.
http://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/wacanadidaktika/article/view/460/402
Fauziah, A., & Darvina, Y. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik dalam Memahami Materi Gerak Lurus dan Gerak Parabola pada Kelas X SMAN 1 Padang. PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION, 12 (1), 73-80.
Fitriani, N., Gunawan, G., & Sutrio, S. (2017). Berpikir Kreatif dalam Fisika dengan Pembelajaran Conceptual Understanding Procedures (CUPs) berbantuan LKPD. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3 (1), 24-33.
http://www.jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/JPFT/article/view/319/310
Giancoli, D. C. (2014). Physics: Principles with Applications 7th Edition. Boston: Pearson.
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11 (5), 989-1008.
https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/38957/index.pdf.
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2013). Fundamentals of Physics 10th Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Haryono, H. E., Aini, K. N., Samsudin, A., & Siahaan, P. (2020). The Implementation of Cognitive Conflict Learning Strategy in Efforts to Reduce Heat Misconception in Junior High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8 (3), 319-327.
https://jurnal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jpf/article/view/3950/2765
Ilyas, I., Liu, A. N. A. M., & Doa, H. (2020). The Influence of Virtual Labs on the Students’ Learning Outcomes and Scientific Attitudes at Physics Education Study Program Flores University. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8 (1), 23–32.
https://jurnal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jpf/article/view/2831/2391
Jannah, E. M., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Identify 11th Grade of Senior High School Jogoroto students’ misconceptions on Dynamic Rotation and Rigid Body Equilibrium concepts using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491 (1), 012010. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012010/pdf.
Kemendikbud. (2014). Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta, Indonesia: Departemen Pen-didikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10 (5), 509-521.
https://www.ejmste.com/download/using-three-tier-diagnostic-test-to-assess-students-misconceptions-of-states-of-matter-4321.pdf.
Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3 (2), 283-293. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.388.382&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Milenković, D. D., Hrin, T. N., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. (2016). Development of a Three-Tier Test as a Valid Diagnostic Tool for Identification of Misconceptions Related to Carbohydrates. Journal of Chemical Education, 93 (9), 1514-1520.
Pebriyanti, D., Sahidu, H., & Sutrio, S. (2017). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Perubahan Konseptual Untuk Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Fisika pada Siswa Kelas X Sman 1 Praya Barat Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 1 (2), 92-96. http://jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/JPFT/article/view/241/237.
Qonita, M., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). The Validity and Reliability of Five-Tier Conception Diagnostic Test for Vector Concepts. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9 (03), 459-465. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/35743.
Respatiningrum, N., Radiyono, Y., & Wiyono, E. (2015). Analisis Miskonsepsi Materi Fluida pada Buku Ajar Fisika SMA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika (SNFPF) 2015 (pp. 313-317). Solo, Indonesia.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/289790761.pdf
Riduwan, & Akdon. (Ed.). (2013). Rumus dan Data dalam Analisis Statistika (Edisi Kelima). Bandung: ALFABETA.
Rukmana, A. P., Tantri M. and Andista C. Y. (2020). Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Untuk Mendeteksi Miskonsepsi Pada Fisika SMA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika (SNPF) 2020 (pp. 1-6). Madiun, Indonesia.
Salsabila, F. N., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Validity and Reliability of Conception Diagnostic Test Using Five-Tier Format for Elasticity Concepts. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9 (03), 439-446. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/35747.
Saputri, D. F., & Nurussaniah, N. (2015). Penyebab Miskonsepsi pada Optika Geometris. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) 2015 (pp. 33-36). Jakarta, Indonesia.
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/prosidingsnf/article/view/5022/3708
Serway, R., Faughn, J., & Vuille, C. (2010). College Physics Ninth Edition. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Sholihat, F. N., Samsudin, A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test pada Sub-Materi Fluida Dinamik: Azas Kontinuitas. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3 (2), 175-180.
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jpppf/article/view/4602/4005
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.
Yolenta, Desfhie, dan Leo Sutrisno. (2014). Deskripsi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Sekecamatan Kapuas Tentang Gerak Melingkar Beraturan Menggunakan Three-Tier Test. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 4 (3), 1-7. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/9310/9205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i1.4763
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.