The Impact of Augmented Reality Media on High School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Physics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/zsft6997
augmented reality, critical thinking skills, digital learning media, physics education
Abstract
The rapid development of digital technologies has created new opportunities to enhance learning processes in science education, particularly in physics, which is often perceived as abstract and conceptually difficult. Students frequently struggle to interpret invisible phenomena such as electric charges and fields, leading to misconceptions that hinder higher-order thinking skills. In response to this challenge, augmented reality (AR) has emerged as a promising instructional tool capable of visualizing abstract concepts and fostering active engagement. This study aimed to investigate the effect of AR-based learning media on students’ critical thinking skills in high school physics. A quasi-experimental design with a posttest-only nonequivalent control group was employed, involving two intact Grade XII classes: the experimental group (n = 32) received instruction using PyLo-AR, while the control group (n = 33) was taught through conventional methods. Data were collected using a validated essay test that measured four critical thinking indicators: interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference. The results of descriptive analysis showed that the experimental group achieved a higher mean score (M = 14.56, SD = 2.03) compared to the control group (M = 12.94, SD = 1.95). Inferential analysis using the independent samples t-test indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.002), confirming the effectiveness of AR-based instruction. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on critical thinking outcomes rather than solely on conceptual understanding or motivation. In conclusion, AR-based media not only improve students’ mastery of abstract physics concepts but also strengthen their critical thinking skills, offering meaningful contributions to the advancement of physics education in the twenty-first century.
References
Ahzari, S., & Akmam, A. (2025). Analyzing students’ critical thinking as a basis for developing interactive physics multimedia with generative learning and cognitive conflict strategies. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17702
Akhiruyanto, A., & Yudhistira, D. (2024). Trends in augmented reality and virtual reality studies in sports education: Bibliometric analysis of the Scopus database for 2019–2024. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 24(4), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2024.4.17
Andriani, A. A. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa program studi pendidikan fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v4i1.302
Arni, K. J. (2025). Systematic review of research trends on critical thinking skills in physics learning. International Journal of Science Education and Science, 2(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.56566/ijses.v2i1.262
Azzahra, D. W., Awalyah, N., Raldiastari, S., & Sulfa, M. (2024). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan penyelesaian masalah dengan menggunakan model problem based learning pada siswa kelas V UPTD SDN 104 Inpres Makkaraeng Kabupaten Maros. Jurnal Guru Pencerah Semesta, 2(4), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.56983/jgps.v2i4.1194
Azzahra, W., Diana, S., Nuraeni, E., Yusni, D., & Andriyatno, I. (2024). Integration of augmented reality (AR) in biology education: A systematic literature review. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 34, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.792
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio Books.
Chang, Q., Pan, X., Manikandan, N., & Ramesh, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence technologies for teaching and learning in higher education. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 29(5), 2240006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021853932240006X
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Facione, P. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Fariyani, Q., Nisak, N. K., & Safitri, I. (2025). Analysis of science literacy of physics education students at UIN Walisongo Semarang using the PISA model test instrument. Physics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 1–8. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/perj/article/view/27704
Fatonah, A., Worku, H., & Inyang, F. (2024). Improving student learning outcomes on earth layers material by using audio visual media. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 5(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i2.887
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Hahn, M. D., Machado, N. A., Carvalho, P. S., Cruz, F. A. D. (2025). Using physics simulation to understand biology process of ion channels. Physics Education, 60(5), 1-10. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2025PhyEd..60e5027H/doi:10.1088/1361-6552/adf7f9
Herliana, F., Mardila, R., Mahzum, E., Zainuddin, Z., Wahyuni, A., Elisa., E., & Muliyati, D. (2025). The effect of web-based inquiry physics problems on high school students’ physics learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17788
Hidajat, F. A. (2024). Augmented reality applications for mathematical creativity: A systematic review. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 991-1040. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00287-7
Hidayat, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). A systematic review of augmented reality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9257–9282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12157-x
Hidayatunnajah, H. (2021). Pengaruh media pembelajaran augmented reality berbasis Android terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik pada konsep suhu dan kalor. Skripsi. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Repository. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/60510
Lubis, J. A., Pantiwati, Y., & Rahardjanto, A. (2025). Students’ scientific literacy in critical thinking skills in science learning: A bibliometric analysis from the Scopus database. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(2), 1100–1112. https://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/bioscientist/article/view/15732
Luthfi, A., Muskhir, M., Effendi, H., Jalinus, N., & Nikolaevna, G. M. (2025). Mapping the future of augmented reality in 21st century education: A comprehensive bibliometric review. Journal of Hypermedia & Technology-Enhanced Learning, 3(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.58536/j-hytel.173
Martawijaya, M. A., Rahmadhanningsih, S., Swandi, A., Hasyim, M., & Sujiono, E. H. (2023). The effect of applying the ethno-STEM-project-based learning model on students’ higher-order thinking skill and misconception of physics topics related to Lake Tempe, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.38703
Mor, B., Patel, R. N., & Prajapati, B. (2025). 21st-century competencies in physics: Assessment strategies for critical thinking, problem-solving, and character formation. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 6(2), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v6i2.2030
Nasar, A., Sinar, Y., & Nanut, F. A. (2025). Integrating inquiry-based learning with PHET simulations: A strategy to enhance higher-order thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17563
Nurjanah, S., Iqbal, M., Sultan, J., Sholihin, S., Ulyasari, N, & Rashid, S. (2024). Research trends of augmented reality in physics education based on Scopus database in thirteen years (2010–2023): A bibliometric approach. Journal of Science Education Research, 9(3), 438–452. https://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5383
Pujono, E., Maulana, F., David, A., & Opeyemi, B. (2024). Exploring innovative approaches: Optimizing Google Classroom for enhanced motivation in science learning. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 5(2), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i2.965
Rachmawati, F. A., & Wiyatmo, Y. (2025). The effectiveness of a renewable energy e-worksheet in STEM-project-based learning to improve students’ critical thinking and collaboration skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17432
Rahmat, A. D., Kuswanto, H., & Wilujeng, I. (2023). A systematic literature review of integrating augmented reality technology in science learning. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 10(2), 172–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um031v10i22023p172
Razali, N., & Wah, Y. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Power-comparisons-of-Shapiro-Wilk-%2C-%2C-Lilliefors-Razali-Wah/dcdc0a0be7d65257c4e6a9117f69e246fb227423
Sari, I. M., Karim, S., Lubis, M. H., Saepuzaman, D., & Sinaga, P. (2020). Efektivitas model based learning (MBL) dalam meningkatkan penguasaan konsep peserta didik pada materi kalor dan perpindahannya. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v5i1.23422
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Sianipar, P., T., G., Wilonotomo, W., & Assiroj, P. (2025). Exploring the role of augmented reality in education: Systematic literature review. JUTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi, 23(2), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24068535.v23i2.a1267
Siregar, K. D. P., Ramadhaniyati, R., Muhammad, I., & Triansyah, F. A. (2023). Analisis bibliometrik: Fokus penelitian critical thinking pada sekolah menengah (1992–2023). EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i1.265
Supriyadi, E., Juandi, D., Turmudi, T., & Pebrianti, A. (2023). Augmented reality in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis utilizing the Scopus database. Journal on Mathematics Education Research (J-MER), 4(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.17509/j-mer.v4i2.65081
Volioti, C., Keramopoulos, E., Sapounidis, T., Melisidis, K., Zafeiropoulou, M., Sotiriou, C., & Spiridis, V. (2022). Using augmented reality in K-12 education: An indicative platform for teaching physics. Information (Switzerland), 13(7), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13070336
Zhang, J., Li, G., Huang, Q., Feng, Q., & Luo, H. (2022). Augmented reality in K–12 education: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 2000 to 2020. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(15), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159725
Zufahmi, Z., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2025). Augmented reality in science learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Education Review, 11(1), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v11i1.38570
Zulkarnaen, Z., Rahayu, S., & Artayasa, I. P. (2025). Trends in project-based learning for developing critical thinking skills in science education: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Science Education and Science, 2(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.56566/ijses.v2i1.258
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
