Phys’AR as a Learning Innovation: Strengthening Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills in Applied Physics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/h80x0b78
applied physics, augmented reality, critical thinking, Phys' AR, scientific argumentation
Abstract
Critical thinking and argumentation are essential twenty-first-century skills in physics education. Yet, conventional teaching methods often fail to provide students with sufficient opportunities to practice and develop these abilities. To address this challenge, this study introduced Phys’AR, an Augmented Reality (AR)–based learning medium designed not only to visualize abstract physics concepts but also to embed structured activities for constructing and evaluating arguments. The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design involving 42 undergraduate students of physics education, divided into a 2023 control group and a 2024 experimental group. Quantitative data on critical thinking and argumentation skills were collected through standardized tests and analyzed using normality tests, homogeneity tests, and independent samples t-tests, while qualitative insights were gathered from classroom observations and student interviews. The findings showed that students in the experimental group significantly outperformed those in the control group in critical thinking, with higher post-test averages and more consistent score improvements. Analysis of argumentation revealed that students supported their claims with stronger data when learning with Phys’AR. However, most remained at a medium level in warrants and backings, and rebuttals were generally weak across both groups. These results indicate that Phys’AR is effective in strengthening evidence-based reasoning but requires complementary teaching strategies to promote deeper theoretical justification and counter-argumentation. The novelty of this study lies in extending the role of AR in physics education from a visualization tool to a platform for argumentation and critical reasoning. By highlighting which components of argumentation benefit most from AR and which require additional scaffolding, this research contributes both theoretical and practical insights for advancing critical thinking and argumentation in physics education.
References
Akbaş, Y., Şahin, İ. F., & Meral, E. (2019). Implementing argumentation-based science learning approach in social studies: Academic achievement and students’ views. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 9(1), 209–245. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.529139
Alzahrani, A. (2025). A systematic review of the use of information communication technology, including augmented reality, in the teaching of science to preschool children. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 9, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100453
Amani, J., & Mkimbili, S. T. (2025). Developing critical thinking skills among secondary schools students: The role of research project. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 58, 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101883
Andrews, R. (2015). Critical thinking and/or argumentation in higher education. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education, 49-62. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_3
Bati, K. (2019). Are we ready for argumentation in science classrooms? An investigation into the scientific discussion climate in a Turkish elementary school. Critical Questions in Education, 10(1), 29–43.
Bavlı, B., & Özdemir, K. (2025). The conceptualization and enactment of critical thinking across diverse curricula in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 58, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101914
Chen, X., Zhao, H., Jin, H., & Li, Y. (2024). Exploring college students’ depth and processing patterns of critical thinking skills and their perception in argument map (AM)-supported online group debate activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101467
Chowning, J. T., Griswold, J. C., Kovarik, D. N., & Collins, L. J. (2012). Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education. PLoS ONE, 7(5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036791
Creswell, J. W. (2022). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2022). The impact of augmented reality-based argumentation activities on middle school students’ academic achievement and motivation in science classes. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.31014/AIOR.1993.05.02.464
Fonseca, X., Spangenberger, P., Baer, M., Schmidt, R., & Söbke, H. (2025). Location-based augmented reality in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Open, 9, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100277
Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking? Argumentation? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.001
Gültepe, N., & Kılıç, Z. (2021). The effects of scientific argumentation on high school students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(6), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.382.13
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, H. M., & Sutomo, H. (2015). Argument-driven inquiry with scaffolding as the development strategy of argumentation and critical thinking skills of students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 1185–1192.
Jegstad, K. M., Heggernes, S. L., Jøsok, E., Ryen, E., Svanes, I. K., & Tørnby, H. (2025). Approaches to critical thinking in primary education classrooms: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 48, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100711
Joiner, R., & Jones, S. (2003). The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(8), 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.11.008
Jon, E., Asrial, A., Hasibuan, M. H. E., & Hariyadi, B. (2023). Interaction of the reflective ethnobiology (REBI) model and creative thinking argumentation in biodiversity material. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(3), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i3.29279
Lespita, E., Purwanto, A., & Syarkowi, A. (2023). Application of problem-based learning model assisted by augmented reality media to improve students’ high-order thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i1.9069
Lv, X., Zhou, J., & Ren, X. (2025). The bidirectional relationship between critical thinking and academic achievement is independent of general cognitive ability: A three-year longitudinal study on elementary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 120, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102666
McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20364
Mesa, M. del M., Valor, D., Montes, A., & García-Casas, I. (2025). Energy under debate: Fostering critical thinking in chemical engineering through in-class debates. Education for Chemical Engineers, 51, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2025.03.002
Nurilma, F. R., Supriana, E., & Diantoro, M. (2023). Using STEM-based 3D-multimedia to improve students’ critical thinking skills in uniform circular motion. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.10785
Prabayanti, E., Usman, U., Khaeruddin, K., & Setiawan, T. (2025). Analysis of students’ critical thinking abilities in physics learning: A case study at SMAN 5 Sidrap. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12(3), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v12i3.15317
Radu, I., Huang, X., Kestin, G., & Schneider, B. (2023). How augmented reality influences student learning and inquiry styles: A study of 1-1 physics remote AR tutoring. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100011
Rebello, C. M., Deiró, G. F., Knuutila, H. K., Moreira, L. C. de S., & Nogueira, I. B. R. (2024). Augmented reality for chemical engineering education. Education for Chemical Engineers, 47, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2024.04.001
Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring critical thinking in physics: Development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0
Toulmin, S. E. (2015). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Wu, J. F., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., & Tang, X. J. (2025). The effectiveness of immersive media in promoting consumer products: Augmented vs. virtual reality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 86, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104323
Zhang, Y., Guo, W., Ji, B., & Shi, H. (2025). An exploratory case study of Chinese college students’ critical thinking skills through interactive independent courses: Evidence from behavioral and brain imaging. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101867
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
