Enhancing Junior High School Students’ Motivation in Physics Learning through Kahoot! Based Gamification: An ARCS Model Approach
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/5ahhrt95
ARCS model, gamification, kahoot!, physics education, motivation
Abstract
Motivation plays a pivotal role in shaping students’ engagement and achievement, particularly in subjects such as physics that are often perceived as difficult and abstract. Numerous studies have shown that low motivation among junior high school students contributes to poor performance and limited participation. This highlights the urgency of innovative instructional approaches that can foster interest and persistence. Gamification has emerged as a promising solution, with platforms such as Kahoot! providing interactive features designed to increase student engagement through competition, feedback, and collaboration. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of Kahoot!-based gamification in enhancing students’ learning motivation in physics, measured comprehensively using Keller’s ARCS model (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction). A quasi-experimental design with a one-group pretest–posttest approach was employed, involving 175 eighth-grade students from six junior high schools in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Data were collected through a validated ARCS-based motivation questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, effect size calculation, and normalized gain (N-Gain). The findings revealed a significant increase in students’ motivation, with overall scores rising from 3.15 to 4.10, a large effect size (r = 0.85), and a medium N-Gain (0.51). The greatest improvement occurred in attention, while satisfaction increased the least. These results confirm that Kahoot! effectively improves multiple dimensions of motivation and demonstrates its value as an innovative tool for fostering interactive, student-centered learning in physics. The novelty of this study lies in applying the ARCS framework to analyze gamification outcomes in junior high school physics. The contribution of this study lies in demonstrating that gamification, particularly through Kahoot!, can effectively enhance multiple dimensions of learning motivation in physics. Furthermore, the findings enrich the body of knowledge on gamification in science education and present valuable implications for improving physics learning in Indonesia and comparable educational contexts.
References
Aldalur, I., & Perez, A. (2023). Gamification and discovery learning: Motivating and involving students in the learning process. Heliyon, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13135
Andari, R. (2020). Pemanfaatan media pembelajaran berbasis game edukasi Kahoot! pada pembelajaran fisika. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 135–142. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/519971-none-229ffc83.pdf
Asniza, I. N., Zuraidah, M. O. S., Baharuddin, A. R. M., Zuhair, Z. M., & Nooraida, Y. (2021). Online game-based learning using Kahoot! to enhance pre-university students’ active learning: A students’ perception in biology classroom. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.57
Baguio, F., Rama, F. M. I., Rico, J. M. L., & Salazar, D. A. (2021). Grade 8 learner’s achievement and motivation level in geometry using Kahoot! as a formative assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012014
Bahri, A., & Nurhidayah. (2024). Increasing learning motivation through Kahoot as a media game-based learning. Journal of Education Technology, 8(3), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i3.68365
Bouchrika, I., Harrati, N., Wanick, V., & Wills, G. (2021). Exploring the impact of gamification on student engagement and involvement with e-learning systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1244–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1623267
Bunyamin, A. C., Juita, D. R., & Syalsiah, N. (2020). Penggunaan Kahoot sebagai media pembelajaran berbasis permainan sebagai bentuk variasi pembelajaran. Gunahumas, 3(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.17509/ghm.v3i1.28388
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Daryanes, F., & Ririen, D. (2020). Efektivitas penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat evaluasi pada mahasiswa. JNSI: Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 3(2), 172-186. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346551178_Efektivitas_Penggunaan_Aplikasi_Kahoot_Sebagai_Alat_Evaluasi_pada_Mahasiswa
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Di Blasi, M., De Angelis, I., & Postiglione, A. (2022). The usage of Kahoot! during activities for schools on physics. Il Nuovo Cimento C, 45(6), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2022-22220-7
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Fazriyah, N., Saraswati, A., Permana, J., & Indriani, R. (2020). Penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot! pada pembelajaran media dan sumber pembelajaran SD. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 6(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v6i1.119
Field, A. P. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Freitas, F. O. S. R., Scafuri, A. G. S., Scafuri, M. A. S., Teixeira, C. S., Silva, I. N., Lucena, J. D., Neto, J., & Cerqueira, G. (2020). Kahoot as a tool in the anatomy teaching and learning process: Teaching gamification. The FASEB Journal, 34(S1), 09901. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.09901
Ghawail, E. A. A., & Yahia, S. B. (2022). Using the e-learning gamification tool Kahoot! to learn chemistry principles in the classroom. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 2667–2676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.325
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. USA: Dept of Physics Indiana University.
Hidayat, I., Supriani, A., Setiawan, A., & Lubis, A. (2023). Implementation of the Kahoot application as an interactive learning medium with students of SMP Negeri 1 Kunto Darussalam. Journal on Education, 6(1), 6933-6942. https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/3924
Humairah, N. A., Rosman, A., Amir, F., Kalum, U., Ilda (2025). Analysis of the impact of contextual teaching and learning integrated with Quizizz on high school students’ learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(2), 243–259. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jpf/article/view/17915
Iju, M. V., Dinatha, N. M., Rewo, J. M., & Kua, M. Y. (2025). Development of science learning media based on science literacy on the topic of series and parallel circuits in junior high school. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v6i1.1112
Iman, N., Ramli, M., & Saridewi, N. (2021). Kahoot as an assessment tool: Students’ perception of game-based learning platform. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v7i2.8304
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I. (2021). Gamification in science education: A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3
Kiraga, F. (2023). A study of problem solving in physics learning: A systematic review. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i3.29446
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Navos, D. B., Ordoña, M. B., Llorente, J. M., & Camarao, M. K. G. (2024). Teachers’ difficulty and coping strategies in physics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(4), 1384–1389. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.04.22
Nurlina, N. (2020). Application of guided inquiry learning model towards science process skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i1.3201
Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., Ahdhianto, E., Samsudin, A., & Isnantyo, F. D. (2021). A review of gamification impact on student behavioural and learning outcomes. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 15(21), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i21.24381
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Patar, M. N. A., Nazri, N. A. A., Razlan, R., Embong, Z., Ahmad, S., & Mahmud, J. (2024). Gamification and its impact on learning fundamental physics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(9), 1555–1579. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i9/22701
Petrusly, P., Kollo, F. L., Bani, M. D. S., Mahfud, T., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2024). The effect of gamification using Kahoot on students’ critical thinking abilities: The role of mediating learning engagement and motivation. Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research, 30(5), 953-963. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.1524
Polit, D. E., & Beck, C. T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research (6th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Rahmawati, S. (2023). Efektivitas penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot dalam pembelajaran IPA SD. Jurnal Elementary: Kajian Teori dan Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.31764/elementary.v6i1.12834
Razali, N. M, & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267205556_Power_Comparisons_of_Shapiro-Wilk_Kolmogorov-Smirnov_Lilliefors_and_Anderson-Darling_Tests
Rini, E. F. S. Oktavia, W. D., & Hong, D. H. (2024). The learning cycle 5e model: motivation and learning outcomes in physics learning. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v9i1.29642
Sakdah, M. S., Prastowo, A., & Anas, N. (2021). Implementasi Kahoot sebagai media pembelajaran berbasis game-based learning terhadap hasil belajar dalam menghadapi era revolusi industri 4.0. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.1845
Santoso, J. T. B., & Widiyanti, A. (2022). Kahoot! sebagai inovasi evaluasi hasil belajar siswa yang efektif dan menyenangkan. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 8(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v8i2.21384
Setiaji, B., Wiyatmo, Y., Diyana, T. N., Pujianto, P., Gustama, M. W., Vidaroini, S., Solehati, C., Sakinata, A. M., Febriani, F., & Bunma, C. (2024). An analysis of physics learning motivation using a case study-based learning motivation assessment instrument. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v10i2.75815
Sindi, S., Nurlina, N., & Marisda, D. H. (2023). Efektivitas pembelajaran dengan asesmen berbasis Kahoot terhadap motivasi belajar fisika peserta didik. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 9(2), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v9i2.19315
Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning: A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818
Wangchuk, D., Wangdi, D., Tshomo, S., & Zangmo, J. (2023). Exploring students’ perceived difficulties of learning physics. Educational Innovation and Practice, 6, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17102/eip.6.2023.03
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
