Enhancing Self-Regulated Learning and Conceptual Understanding through a TPACK-Based Physics E-Module on Momentum and Impulse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/vwec8n65
conceptual understanding, momentum and impulse, physics e-module, self-regulated learning, TPACK
Abstract
Physics learning frequently poses challenges for students due to the abstract nature of its concepts, particularly in topics such as momentum and impulse, which often result in misconceptions and low engagement. In response to this urgency, integrating technology through the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework has been advocated as an effective strategy to improve conceptual understanding and foster self-regulated learning (SRL). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a TPACK-based physics e-module in simultaneously enhancing students’ conceptual comprehension and SRL. Employing a quasi-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design, the research involved 30 students at SMA Negeri 2 Merauke, Indonesia. Instruments included a 20-item multiple-choice test on momentum and impulse concepts and a 20-item SRL questionnaire, both validated using Gregory’s content validity index (CVI > 0.80) and demonstrating strong reliability (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.80). Data analysis comprised descriptive statistics, normality testing, paired-sample t-tests, effect size calculations, and normalized gain (N-Gain) indices. The results indicated significant improvements in both domains: SRL scores increased from a mean of 67.60 to 77.67 (t = 12.45; p < 0.001; d = 1.49; N-Gain = 0.449), while conceptual understanding improved from 60.47 to 74.13 (t = 14.23; p < 0.001; d = 1.62; N-Gain = 0.497). These findings confirm that the e-module effectively addressed both cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning. The novelty of this study lies in its dual focus on SRL and conceptual mastery within a single intervention, applied in a frontier educational context. The study contributes to physics education by providing empirical evidence of TPACK’s capacity to deliver scalable, context-sensitive innovations that enhance learning outcomes in diverse settings.
References
Achor, E. E., Ellah, B. O., & Omaga, J. O. (2022). Misconceptions and difficult concepts as determinant of students’ academic engagement and retention in physics. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 34(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v1i1.17660
Adianto, T., & Rusli, M. A. (2021). Analysis of students’ difficulties in solving physics problem: Impulse and momentum topics. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v10i1.41517
Ahadi, G. D., & Zain, N. N. L. E. (2023). Pemeriksaan uji kenormalan dengan Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling dan Shapiro-Wilk. Eigen Mathematics Journal, 6(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.29303/emj.v6i1.131
Amelia, R., Rofiki, I., Tortop, H. S., & Abah, J. A. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ scientific explanation with e-scaffolding in blended learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.5091
Ayu, H. D., Chusniyah, D. A., Kurniawati, M. P., Purwanti, P. F., Lukitawanti, S. D., & Putri, A. N. (2024). Problem-based learning (PBL) as an effective solution to enhance understanding of physics concepts: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 2(2), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v2i2.29
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Waddington, D. I., & Pickup, D. I. (2019). Twenty-first century adaptive teaching and individualized learning operationalized as specific blends of student-centered instructional events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1–2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1017
Fadillah, M. A., Asrizal, A., Festiyed, F., & Usmeldi, U. (2024). The effect of e-modules on physics learning in senior high school: A meta-analysis. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 574–589. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i3.21641
Fahrudin, A., Maison, M., Purwaningsih, S., & Marzal, J. (2025). Science literacy and skills of physics education students by developing a project-technology skills learning model. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(3), 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i3.21839
Faresta, R. A., Nicholas, T. Z. S. B., Chi, Y., Sinambela, I. A. N., & Mopoliu, A. Z. (2024). Utilization of technology in physics education: A literature review and implications for the future physics learning. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v12i1.11676
Grayson, D. J. (2020). Physics education for 21st century graduates. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1512(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1512/1/012043
Hatch, D. K., Mardock-Uman, N., & Nelson, M. J. (2018). Content validation of the Community College Student Success Program Inventory. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 42(6), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1323694
Jaafar, N., Mohd Nor, S. R., Norrulashikin, S. M., Kamisan, N. A. B., & Mohamad, A. Q. (2022). Increase students’ understanding of mathematics learning using the technology-based learning. International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 28(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.37934/frle.28.1.2429
Jamil, M., Hafeez, F. A., & Muhammad, N. (2024). Critical thinking development for 21st century: Analysis of physics curriculum. Journal of Social & Organizational Matters, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v3i1.45
Kaniawati, I., Triyani, G., Danawan, A., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2021). Implementation of Interactive Conceptual Instruction (ICI) with computer simulation: Impact of students’ misconceptions on momentum and impulse material. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.8375
Makhrus, M., Zuhdi, M., Wahyudi, W., & Taufik, M. (2020). Increasing conceptual understanding through CCM-CCA based learning device. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.347
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Odek, R., & Opuodho, G. (2023). F-test and p-values: A synopsis. Journal of Management and Science, 13(2), 59–61. https://doi.org/10.26524/jms.13.22
Pardede, E. R. M., Ruslan, D., & Arwansyah. (2025). Development of flipbook-based e-module teaching materials to enhance independence and learning outcomes of high school students. Jurnal Paedagogy: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 12(2), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i2.15101
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Prananto, I. W., Rakhmawati, Y., & Pamungkas, T. (2022). Content validity ratio (CVR), content validity index (CVI), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in mathematics learning independence instruments. Kontinu: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 6(2), 116–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.6.2.116-132
Pratiwi, F. A. I., Kuswanto, H., & Ariswan, A. (2025). Students’ conceptual understanding in physics learning: A systematic literature review. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 10(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v10i1.5953
Purwaningsih, E., Nurhadi, D., & Masjkur, K. (2019). TPACK development of prospective physics teachers to ease the achievement of learning objectives: A case study at the State University of Malang, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012042
Putri, N. N., Rukanda, N., & Yuliani, W. (2023). Validitas dan reliabilitas angket kemandirian belajar. Fokus: Kajian Bimbingan & Konseling dalam Pendidikan, 6(4), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.22460/fokus.v6i4.11006
Putri, V. A., Sundari, P. D., Mufit, F., & Dewi, W. S. (2024). Analysis of students’ physics conceptual understanding using five-tier multiple choice questions: The Newton’s law of motion context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2275–2285. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.5847
Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (The comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029
Rincon-Flores, E. G., Castaño, L., Guerrero Solis, S. L., Olmos Lopez, O., Rodríguez Hernández, C. F., Castillo Lara, L. A., & Aldape Valdés, L. P. (2024). Improving the learning-teaching process through adaptive learning strategy. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00314-9
Riswan, D., Diana, Z., & Rohmadi, S. H. (2024). Peran motivasi belajar antara literasi digital dan kemandirian belajar pada siswa sekolah menengah atas. Academia: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Akademik, 4(4), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.51878/academia.v4i4.3672
Rufaida, S., & Nurfadilah. (2021). The development of device learning based on TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) in the form of hypercontent modules in electronics courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012006
Sukmadewi, A. G. A. G., & Jumadi, J. (2023). Development of mobile learning-based e-module to improve concept understanding and interest learning X class student in momentum and impulse. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 5914–5920. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3565
Suprapto, N., & Nandyansah, W. (2021). PicsAR: A physics visualisation to enhance students’ thinking skills in abstract concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1805(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012024
Thohir, M. A., Yanti, F. A., Handayani, R. D., & Halim, L. (2025). Relationship of TPACK, motivation, self-regulation, and learning performance on preservice primary school teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(1), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i1.30144
Wardoyo, A., & Sunismi, S. (2024). Contextual teaching and learning approach based on TPACK to increase students’ interest in learning and learning outcomes. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v9i3.598
Wedel, M., & Gal, D. (2024). Beyond statistical significance: Five principles for the new era of data analysis and reporting. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(1), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1379
Weylin, W., Raharjo, H., Haqq, A. A., & Larsari, V. N. (2023). Empowering students in the digital era: An analysis of interactive e-modules’ effect on digital mathematical communication. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v1i02.401
Yengkopiong, J. P. (2023). Differentiation in the classroom: A pedagogical approach for a successful engagement of students in secondary schools. East African Journal of Education Studies, 6(2), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.6.2.1213
Yun, V. W. S., Ulang, N. M., & Husain, S. H. (2023). Measuring the internal consistency and reliability of the hierarchy of controls in preventing infectious diseases on construction sites: The Kuder-Richardson (KR-20) and Cronbach’s alpha. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 33(1), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.33.1.392405
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
