Integration of PBL-Based E-Modules in Physics Education: Improving Problem-Solving Skills on Static Fluid Concept
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/0ddpg995
21st-century competencies, e-modules, problem-based learning, problem-solving skills, static fluid
Abstract
Developing students’ problem-solving skills is a central aim of modern science education, yet many learners continue to struggle when applying physics concepts to authentic situations. In Indonesia, this challenge remains urgent, as national and international assessments consistently highlight gaps in higher-order thinking and reasoning. Responding to this need, the present study sought to investigate the effectiveness of a problem-based learning (PBL)–based electronic module (e-module) designed around Polya’s four problem-solving stages in improving high school students’ abilities in the static fluid topic. Using a pre-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design, the study involved 28 students who completed validated pretest and posttest instruments aligned with Polya’s framework. Data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially through the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, normalized gain (N-gain), and Cohen’s d effect size. The results showed a clear increase in mean scores from 47.91 on the pretest to 73.11 on the posttest, with all four indicators: understanding the problem, planning solutions, implementing strategies, and evaluating outcomes. The Wilcoxon test confirmed statistically significant improvements for all participants, with an effect size of 1.971 indicating a very large practical impact. These findings demonstrate that integrating PBL with structured digital scaffolding can meaningfully enhance students’ problem-solving skills. The novelty of this research lies in adapting Polya’s classic model into an interactive e-module format and embedding it within PBL to promote inquiry and reflection. Overall, the study contributes to physics education by providing evidence that digital PBL resources can narrow performance gaps and foster deeper, more equitable learning outcomes in line with 21st-century educational demands.
References
Ali, A., Islamiah, D., & Zulkifli, Z. (2019). The effectiveness of problem-based learning in improving high-order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1150(1), 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1150/1/012065
Asad, M., Iqbal, K., & S. M. (2015). Effectiveness of problem-based learning as a strategy to foster problem solving and critical reasoning skills among medical students. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 27(3), 604–607.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415.
Belland, B. R., French, B. F., & Ertmer, P. A. (2009). Validity and problem-based learning research: A review of instruments used to assess intended learning outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1059
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed.
Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi, N. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Papers Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi, 562–569. https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/sncp/article/view/1096
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hasrawati, Ikhsan, M, & Hajidin (2020). Improving students’ problem-solving ability and learning motivation through problem-based learning model in senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012027
Herawati, N. I., & Wilujeng, I. (2023). Improving problem-solving ability through problem-based learning e-modules. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 6787–6794. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4622
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Kadir, Z., Abdullah, N., Anthony, E., Salleh, B., & Kamarulzaman, R. (2016). Does problem-based learning improve problem-solving skills? A study among business undergraduates at Malaysian premier technical university. International Education Studies, 9(5), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p166
Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x
Kemendikbud. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1999). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in elementary school. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Mahmudi, A. G., Irawati, L., & Soleh, D. R. (2021). Kesantunan berbahasa siswa dalam berkomunikasi dengan guru (kajian pragmatik). Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 13(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v13i2.6169
Nisa’, K., Nasrullah, A., Hidayat, A., Mahuda, I., & Bhat, I. A. (2023). Problem-based learning in improving problem-solving ability and interest in learning mathematics: An empirical study. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v1i3.725
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Prastowo, A. (2019). Analisis pembelajaran tematik terpadu. Prenada Media.
Prayogi, S., Bilad, M. R., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Asy’ari, M. (2024). Inquiry vs. inquiry-creative: Emphasizing critical thinking skills of prospective STEM teachers in the context of STEM learning in Indonesia. Education Sciences, 14(6), 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060593.
Putra, Y. A., & Rachmawati, Y. (2021). The development of e-module based on problem based learning to improve students’ independent learning skills. Journal of Education Technology, 5(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i2.32756.
Rahmawati, A., Fachri, B.A., Oktavia, S., & Abrori, F., (2021). Extraction bioactive compound of Pegagan (Centella asiatica L.) using solvent-free microwave-assisted extraction. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1053(1), 012125. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1053/1/012125
Riau, B. B. (2023). PISA 2022 dan pemulihan pembelajaran di Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. https://lpmpdki.kemdikbud.go.id/pisa-2022-dan-pemulihan-pembelajaran-di-indonesia/
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (5th ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
Wena, M. (2016). Strategi pembelajaran inovatif kontemporer: Suatu tinjauan konseptual operasional. Bumi Aksara.
Yew, E. H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004.
Yuliana, R., Hidayat, A., & Susanti, N. (2020). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis problem based learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan motivasi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i1.16040.
Yulianti, L., Prahasti, P., & Sari, V. (2020). Aplikasi Sarana Prasarana Pendidikan Pada SMKN 4 Kota Bengkulu Menggunakan Pemrograman Visual Basic. Jurnal Media Infotama, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.37676/jmi.v16i2.1143.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
