Exploring the Role of Digital Literacy as a Predictor of Self-Regulated Learning in Physics Education

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/ghc8bt46

Authors

  • Riswanto Riswanto Department of Physics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, Indonesia
  • Dedy Hidayatullah Alarifin Department of Physics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, Indonesia
  • Arif Hidayat Department of Computer Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, Indonesia

digital literacy, online learning strategies, physics education, self-regulated learning, technology skills

Abstract

The rapid integration of digital technologies into education highlights the critical importance of digital literacy in developing self-regulated learning (SRL), particularly among physics education students. This study aims to investigate the influence of digital literacy on SRL by (1) assessing the digital literacy levels of physics students, (2) examining their SRL profiles, (3) analyzing the predictive power of digital literacy on SRL, and (4) identifying which digital literacy indicators significantly impact different SRL dimensions. A quantitative, cross-sectional approach was employed with 28 undergraduate students using validated instruments: the Digital Literacy Scale and the Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire. The results revealed high digital literacy levels, especially in media utilization (M = 4.17), but lower performance in evaluating digital information (M = 3.96). SRL was strongest in planning (M = 3.3) and monitoring-evaluation (M = 3.2), while autonomy (M = 2.5) and motivation-discipline (M = 2.8) were less developed. Regression analyses confirmed digital literacy as a significant predictor of SRL (β = 0.50; p = 0.016), explaining 58.9% of the variance. Among the digital literacy indicators, digital technology skills emerged as the most influential factor across all SRL dimensions. Furthermore, gender was found to moderate the relationship, with a stronger effect observed in female students. This study contributes to physics education by demonstrating the importance of integrating digital literacy training, particularly in technology skills and information evaluation, into curriculum design to support students' independent learning capabilities in digital learning environments.

References

Agustini, P. (2021). Empat pilar literasi untuk dukung transformasi digital. Aptika Kominfo. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2021/01/empat-pilar-literasi-untuk-dukung-transformasi-digital

Alfakhry, G., Mustafa, K., Ybrode, K., Jazayerli, B., Milly, H., Alhomsi, K., & Jamous, I. (2024). Scaffolding self-regulated learning in operative dentistry through self-assessment training. Journal of Dental Education, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241226820

Arono., Arsyad, S., Syahriman., Nadrah., & Villia, A. S. (2022). Exploring the effect of digital literacy skills and learning styles on students’ meta-cognitive strategies in listening. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15130a

Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2022). sKey factors in digital literacy in learning and education: A systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7395–7419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5

Bahri, A., Hidayat, W. M., Putra, K. P., Ainun, N. A., & Arifin, N. (2024). The relationship between students’ perception of learning media, digital literacy skills, and self-regulated learning with students’ learning outcomes in rural areas. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(2), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2513

Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005

Bellhäuser, H., Dignath, C., & Theobald, M. (2023). Daily automated feedback enhances self-regulated learning: A longitudinal randomized field experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125873

Boudjedra, H. A. R. (2024). Promoting EFL learners’ self-regulated learning through the use of artificial intelligence applications [Master’s thesis, University of Guelma]. DSpace University of Guelma. https://dspace.univ-guelma.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/16767

Burro, R., Santos, J., Lai, Y. H., Shi, H., Xu, L., Duan, P., Padua, S. A., & Li, C. (2022). The impact of self-regulated learning strategies on academic performance for online learning during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1047680

Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institutions using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z

Castro-Alonso, J. C., de Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021). Five strategies for optimizing instructional materials: Instructor-and learner-managed cognitive load. Educ Psychol Rev 33(4), 1379–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-021-09606-9

Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approache. SAGE Publications.

Dekker, W. (2023). Self-regulated learning for Chinese, adult language learners: An intervention study in a blended learning environment [Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary]. PRISM: University of Calgary’s Digital Repository. https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/41663

Derlina, Harahap, R. I. S. S., & Sinaga, B. (2021). Application of ethnophysics integrated with culturally responsive teaching (CRT) methods to improve generic skills of Indonesian science students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 21(1), 68–83. https://jestp.com/menuscript/index.php/estp/article/view/1242

Derlina, Sinulingga, K., Maryono, & Sahyar. (2019). Ethnophysics in learning based on Javanese culture to improve the generic skills of students’ science. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(9), 226–241. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078994439&partnerID=40&md5=01550c6befe0506677dfeed02d3e050a

Hertel, J. P., & Millis, B. J. (2023). Using simulations to promote learning in higher education: An introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003448594

Khodaei, S., Hasanvand, S., Gholami, M., Mokhayeri, Y., & Amini, M. (2022). The effect of the online flipped classroom on self-directed learning readiness and metacognitive awareness in nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Nursing, 21(22), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00804-6

Kiemeneij, W., de Putter, L., & Koopman, M. (2023). Learning biophysics with open simulations. Physics Education, 58(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aca7f6

Kumar, R. (2022). E-learning programs in executive education: Effects of perceived quality and perceived value on self-regulation and motivation. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12(6), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-07-2022-0149

Marion, T. J., & Fixson, S. K. (2021). The transformation of the innovation process: How digital tools are changing work, collaboration, and organizations in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12547

Martzoukou, K., Fulton, C., Kostagiolas, P., & Lavranos, C. (2020). A study of higher education students' self-perceived digital competences for learning and everyday life online participation. Journal of Documentation, 76(6), 1413–1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0041

Marwedel, P. (2021). Embedded system design: Embedded systems foundations of cyber-physical systems, and the Internet of Things. Springer. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/46817

Miastkovska, M., Dembitska, S., Puhach, V., Kobylianska, I., & Kobylianskyi, O. (2024). Improving the efficiency of students' independent work during blended learning in technical universities. In V. Ermolayev, F. Mallet, V. Yakovyna, V. Kharchenko, V. Kobets, A. Burov, & S. Semerikov (Eds.), Communications in computer and information science. Lecture notes in networks and systems, 899, 206–214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51979-6_21

Mirmoadi, B. S., & Satwika, Y. W. (2022). Hubungan antara literasi digital dengan self-regulated learning pada mahasiswa. JDMP (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan), 7(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.26740/jdmp.v7n1.p8-23

Muhingi, W. N., Mavole, J. N., & Nzau, M. (2021). Digital literacy and online child abuse among primary school children in Langata Sub-County, Nairobi City County in Kenya. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2021.5566

Nikou, S., De Reuver, M., & Kanafi, M. M. (2022). Workplace literacy skills—How information and digital literacy affect the adoption of digital technology. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0241

Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 248-292. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1960143

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476

Saregar, A., Kirana, L. J., Asyhari, A., Anugrah, A., Fitri, M. R., & Panse, V. R. (2024). Technology and digital literacy: Interrelationships and the impact of acceptance with self-regulated learning. E3S Web of Conferences, 482, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448204006

Shunkov, V., Shevtsova, O., Koval, V., & Grygorenko, T. (2022). Prospective directions of using multimedia technologies in the training of future specialists. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(6), 739-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.6.93

Simanjuntak, E., Mulya, H. C., Engry, A., & Alfian, I. N. (2025). Dataset of digital literacy of university students in Indonesia. Data in Brief, 58, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.111227

Vasilescu, M. D., Serban, A. C., Dimian, G. C., Aceleanu, M. I., & Picatoste, X. (2020). Digital divide, skills, and perceptions on digitalization in the European Union—Towards a smart labor market. PLOS ONE, 15(4), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232032

Wijayati, P. H., Rizqiana, N. U., & Bukhori, H. A. (2023). Digital and information literacy skills as a base for university-level self-regulated learning. Premise: Journal of English Education, 12(2), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i2.6543

Yaqin, L. N., Prasojo, L. D., Haji-Othman, N. A., Yusof, N., & Habibi, A. (2023). Addressing the digital divide in Indonesian higher education: Insights, implications, and potential solutions. In A. S. Al-Mahrooqi, M. S. Al-Maamari, & N. Al-Hosni (Eds.), Redesigning higher education initiatives for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, 291–307. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7645-4_13

Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2020). Self-directed learning in MOOCs: Exploring the relationships among motivation, self-monitoring, and self-management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2073–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09747-8

Zitierung, E., Radovanović, E., Holst, D., Belur, C., Srivastava, S. B., Houngbonon, R. V., Le Quentrec, G. V., & Noll, J. (2020). Digital literacy key performance indicators for sustainable development. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2587

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Exploring the Role of Digital Literacy as a Predictor of Self-Regulated Learning in Physics Education. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 308-328. https://doi.org/10.26618/ghc8bt46

How to Cite

Exploring the Role of Digital Literacy as a Predictor of Self-Regulated Learning in Physics Education. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 308-328. https://doi.org/10.26618/ghc8bt46