Analyzing Asynchronous Online Discussions in Solid-State Physics: Interaction Patterns and Cognitive Presence Among Distance Learners
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/tpnr8c83
asynchronous online discussion, cognitive presence, open and distance learning, physics education, social network analysis
Abstract
The increasing adoption of online learning in higher education has placed asynchronous discussion forums at the center of teaching and learning, particularly in open and distance learning contexts where student engagement and collaborative inquiry are crucial. In physics education, however, fostering deep conceptual understanding through asynchronous communication remains challenging, as participation often tends to be surface-level and tutor-centered. This study aimed to analyze participation patterns, levels of cognitive presence, and their relationship to student performance in a Solid-State Physics course at Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia. Employing a descriptive case study design, the research collected data from learning management system logs, forum transcripts, tutor feedback, and assignment scores. Cognitive presence was coded using the Community of Inquiry framework, intercoder reliability was established with Cohen’s kappa (κ = 0.88), and interaction structures were visualized using social network analysis. The results revealed that students frequently viewed the forums but contributed relatively few postings, indicating widespread passive participation. Most contributions were concentrated at the triggering and exploration phases, with only about 15% reaching integration or resolution. Interaction maps confirmed a strongly tutor-centered pattern, with minimal peer-to-peer exchanges, while comparison of participation and assignment data showed that more active contributors achieved higher performance. These findings underscore the limited depth of engagement in asynchronous forums but also highlight their potential to support learning when students participate meaningfully. The novelty of this study lies in its triangulated methodology and its focus on physics education in an open and distance learning context. The study contributes empirical evidence for improving asynchronous forum design and facilitation to foster higher-order engagement in physics learning.
References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005
Albrahim, F. A. (2020). Online teaching skills and competencies. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 9–20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1239983
Alhazmi, L. S. S., Bawadood, M. A. A., Aljohani, A. M. S., Alzahrani, A. A. R., Moshref, L., Trabulsi, N., & Moshref, R. (2021). Pain management in breast cancer patients: A multidisciplinary approach. Cureus Journal of Medical Science, 13(6), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15994
Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). The effect of using online discussion forums on students’ learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 164–176. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1124930
Anderson, G., Barton, S., & Wahlberg, M. (2003). Reflections and experiences of further education research in practice. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55(4), 499–516. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13636820300200241
Azizah, E. C. I., Aryadita, H., & Herlambang, A. D. (2018). Evaluasi kualitas website forum diskusi online menggunakan metode Webqual 4.0 dan importance performance analysis (Studi Kasus Pada Website Dictio). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(8), 2549–2559. https://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/1850
Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Barman, L., Engquist, M., Jansson, M., & Enoksson, F. (2019). Interactions in online discussion forums – An underutilized resource for learning? In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028512
Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the “invisible” online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00086-6
Breivik, J. (2020). Argumentative patterns in students’ online discussions in an introductory philosophy course. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-01-02
Bunyamin, A., Arwizet, K., Aziz, A., & Ambiyar. (2019). Penerapan metode belajar diskusi berbantuan Google Classroom untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa kelas X teknik pengelasan SMK Negeri 1 Kecamatan Guguak. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(1), 213-219. https://jurnal.ranahresearch.com/index.php/R2J/article/view/212
Chai, H., Liu, Z., Hu, T., & Li, Q. (2020). A new conceptual framework for measuring online listening in asynchronous discussion forums. In N. Pinkwart & S. Liu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence supported educational technologies, 7–70. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41099-5_4
Cho, M. H., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2342
Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x
Darabi, A., Liang, X., Suryavanshi, R., & Yurekli, H. (2013). Effectiveness of online discussion strategies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.837651
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x
Dawson, G. (2008). Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 20(3), 775–803. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000370
Fatmawati, S. (2019). Efektivitas forum diskusi pada e-learning berbasis Moodle. Refleksi Edukatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 9(2), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v9i2.3379
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & Van Osdel, J. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses
. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 5(4), 609-617. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242088057_Perceptions_of_Interactions_in_Online_Courses
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning
Hu, H., & Wu, M. (2011). Important photon emission results reported by Michael Persinger’s group. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 2(10), 1555–1556. https://jcer.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/192/209
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lederman, D. (2020). Will shift to remote teaching be boon or bane for online learning? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/03/18/most-teaching-going-remote-will-help-or-hurt-online-learning
Lee, Y., & Choi, Y. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003
Mehall, S. (2020). Purposeful interpersonal interaction in online learning: What is it and how is it measured? Online Learning, 24(1), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.2002
Pratama, H., & Yusro, A. C. (2016). Implementasi WhatsApp mobile learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar mahasiswa pokok bahasan pengenalan komponen elektronika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan, 2(2), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v2i2.696
Prayuda, J., & Malik, A. A. (2021). Efektivitas komunikasi terhadap proses belajar dalam pembelajaran online. Da’wah and Communication Islamic Journal, 2(1), 33-40. https://www.siducat.org/index.php/dawuh/article/view/205
Rajab, M. H., Gazal, A. M., & Alkattan, K. (2020). Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus, 12(7), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8966
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(4), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00037-9
Sadaf, A., & Olesova, L. (2017). Enhancing cognitive presence in online case discussions with questions based on the practical inquiry model. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1267525
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
Simanullang, N. H. S., & Rajagukguk, J. (2020). LMS based on Moodle to improve students learning activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012067
Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947
van der Dennen, J. M. (2002). (Evolutionary) Theories of warfare in preindustrial (foraging) societies. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 23(Suppl 4), 55–65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10977857_Evolutionary_Theories_of_warfare_in_preindustrial_foraging_societies
Wu, S.-Y., Hwang, W.-Y., Hou, H.-T., & Liu, E. Z.-F. (2011). A case study of Seamless Online Learning Integrated Discussion. 2011 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering, 6205–6208. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECENG.2011.6056861
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
