Analyzing Asynchronous Online Discussions in Solid-State Physics: Interaction Patterns and Cognitive Presence Among Distance Learners

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/tpnr8c83

Authors

  • Widiasih Department of Physics Education, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7883-4070
  • Arisona Department of Physics Education, and Department of Geological Engineering, Universitas Halu Oleo, Indonesia
  • Dwikoranto Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Rahmawati Department of Physics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
  • Ismail Department of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

asynchronous online discussion, cognitive presence, open and distance learning, physics education, social network analysis

Abstract

The increasing adoption of online learning in higher education has placed asynchronous discussion forums at the center of teaching and learning, particularly in open and distance learning contexts where student engagement and collaborative inquiry are crucial. In physics education, however, fostering deep conceptual understanding through asynchronous communication remains challenging, as participation often tends to be surface-level and tutor-centered. This study aimed to analyze participation patterns, levels of cognitive presence, and their relationship to student performance in a Solid State Physics course at Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia. Employing a descriptive case study design, the research collected data from learning management system logs, forum transcripts, tutor feedback, and assignment scores. Cognitive presence was coded using the Community of Inquiry framework, intercoder reliability was established with Cohen’s kappa (κ = 0.88), and interaction structures were visualized using social network analysis. The results revealed that students frequently viewed the forums but contributed relatively few postings, indicating widespread passive participation. Most contributions were concentrated at the triggering and exploration phases, with only about 15% reaching integration or resolution. Interaction maps confirmed a strongly tutor-centered pattern, with minimal peer-to-peer exchanges, while comparison of participation and assignment data showed that more active contributors achieved higher performance. These findings underscore the limited depth of engagement in asynchronous forums but also highlight their potential to support learning when students participate meaningfully. The novelty of this study lies in its triangulated methodology and its focus on physics education in an open and distance learning context. The study contributes empirical evidence for improving asynchronous forum design and facilitation to foster higher-order engagement in physics learning.

References

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005

Albrahim, F. A. (2020). Online teaching skills and competencies. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 9–20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1239983

Alhazmi, L. S. S., Bawadood, M. A. A., Aljohani, A. M. S., Alzahrani, A. A. R., Moshref, L., Trabulsi, N., & Moshref, R. (2021). Pain management in breast cancer patients: A multidisciplinary approach. Cureus Journal of Medical Science, 13(6), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15994

Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). The effect of using online discussion forums on students’ learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 164–176. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1124930

Anderson, G., Barton, S., & Wahlberg, M. (2003). Reflections and experiences of further education research in practice. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55(4), 499–516. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13636820300200241

Azizah, E. C. I., Aryadita, H., & Herlambang, A. D. (2018). Evaluasi kualitas website forum diskusi online menggunakan metode Webqual 4.0 dan importance performance analysis (Studi Kasus Pada Website Dictio). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(8), 2549–2559. https://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/1850

Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191

Barman, L., Engquist, M., Jansson, M., & Enoksson, F. (2019). Interactions in online discussion forums – An underutilized resource for learning? In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028512

Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the “invisible” online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00086-6

Breivik, J. (2020). Argumentative patterns in students’ online discussions in an introductory philosophy course. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-01-02

Bunyamin, A., Arwizet, K., Aziz, A., & Ambiyar. (2019). Penerapan metode belajar diskusi berbantuan Google Classroom untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa kelas X teknik pengelasan SMK Negeri 1 Kecamatan Guguak. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(1), 213-219. https://jurnal.ranahresearch.com/index.php/R2J/article/view/212

Chai, H., Liu, Z., Hu, T., & Li, Q. (2020). A new conceptual framework for measuring online listening in asynchronous discussion forums. In N. Pinkwart & S. Liu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence supported educational technologies, 7–70. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41099-5_4

Cho, M. H., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2342

Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x

Darabi, A., Liang, X., Suryavanshi, R., & Yurekli, H. (2013). Effectiveness of online discussion strategies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.837651

Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x

Dawson, G. (2008). Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 20(3), 775–803. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000370

Fatmawati, S. (2019). Efektivitas forum diskusi pada e-learning berbasis Moodle. Refleksi Edukatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 9(2), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v9i2.3379

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & Van Osdel, J. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses

. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 5(4), 609-617. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242088057_Perceptions_of_Interactions_in_Online_Courses

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning

Hu, H., & Wu, M. (2011). Important photon emission results reported by Michael Persinger’s group. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 2(10), 1555–1556. https://jcer.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/192/209

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Lederman, D. (2020). Will shift to remote teaching be boon or bane for online learning? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/03/18/most-teaching-going-remote-will-help-or-hurt-online-learning

Lee, Y., & Choi, Y. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y

Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003

Mehall, S. (2020). Purposeful interpersonal interaction in online learning: What is it and how is it measured? Online Learning, 24(1), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.2002

Pratama, H., & Yusro, A. C. (2016). Implementasi WhatsApp mobile learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar mahasiswa pokok bahasan pengenalan komponen elektronika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan, 2(2), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v2i2.696

Prayuda, J., & Malik, A. A. (2021). Efektivitas komunikasi terhadap proses belajar dalam pembelajaran online. Da’wah and Communication Islamic Journal, 2(1), 33-40. https://www.siducat.org/index.php/dawuh/article/view/205

Rajab, M. H., Gazal, A. M., & Alkattan, K. (2020). Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus, 12(7), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8966

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(4), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00037-9

Sadaf, A., & Olesova, L. (2017). Enhancing cognitive presence in online case discussions with questions based on the practical inquiry model. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1267525

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007

Simanullang, N. H. S., & Rajagukguk, J. (2020). LMS based on Moodle to improve students learning activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012067

Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947

van der Dennen, J. M. (2002). (Evolutionary) Theories of warfare in preindustrial (foraging) societies. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 23(Suppl 4), 55–65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10977857_Evolutionary_Theories_of_warfare_in_preindustrial_foraging_societies

Wu, S.-Y., Hwang, W.-Y., Hou, H.-T., & Liu, E. Z.-F. (2011). A case study of Seamless Online Learning Integrated Discussion. 2011 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering, 6205–6208. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECENG.2011.6056861

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Analyzing Asynchronous Online Discussions in Solid-State Physics: Interaction Patterns and Cognitive Presence Among Distance Learners. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 578-591. https://doi.org/10.26618/tpnr8c83

How to Cite

Analyzing Asynchronous Online Discussions in Solid-State Physics: Interaction Patterns and Cognitive Presence Among Distance Learners. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 578-591. https://doi.org/10.26618/tpnr8c83