Factors Influencing Consumer Adoption of Mobile Payment Systems in the Digital Economy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/axbems41

Authors

  • Nur Sandi Marsuni Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar

Mobile Payment, Digital Economy, Consumer Adoption, Financial Technology, Behavioral Intention, Technology Acceptance Model.

Abstract

The rapid growth of the digital economy has accelerated the development of mobile payment systems as an innovative financial technology that enhances transaction efficiency, convenience, and accessibility. Despite the increasing availability of mobile payment services, consumer adoption remains uneven across different demographic and economic contexts. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence consumers’ intentions to adopt mobile payment systems has become an important research issue. This study aims to examine the effects of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust, perceived security, social influence, mobility, and compatibility on consumers’ behavioral intentions to adopt mobile payment systems. The study employs a quantitative research approach using a survey method. Data were collected from 300 respondents who are familiar with mobile payment services and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that all proposed factors significantly influence behavioral intention to adopt mobile payment systems. Among the examined variables, perceived usefulness emerged as the strongest predictor, followed by trust and compatibility. The results indicate that consumers are more likely to adopt mobile payment technologies when they perceive them as beneficial, secure, trustworthy, easy to use, compatible with their lifestyles, and socially supported. The model explains a substantial proportion of variance in behavioral intention, demonstrating its robustness in explaining consumer adoption behavior. This study contributes to the literature on financial technology adoption and provides practical implications for mobile payment providers, policymakers, and financial institutions seeking to enhance digital payment adoption in the digital economy

References

Dahlberg, T., Guo, J., & Ondrus, J. (2015). A critical review of mobile payment research. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(5), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.07.006

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

DOI: Not available (book publication).

Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., & Lee, I. (2010). An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.013

Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.005

Shaikh, A. A., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). Mobile banking adoption: A literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.003

Shin, D. H. (2010). Modeling the interaction of users and mobile payment system: Conceptual framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(10), 917–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2010.502098

Slade, E. L., Williams, M. D., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Piercy, N. C. (2015). Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2014.914075

Yang, S., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., Cao, Y., & Zhang, R. (2012). Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.019

Downloads

Published

2015-04-05