PEOPLE
Peer Review Process
AgriMu Journal applies a double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic integrity of every published article.
-
Submission Screening
-
All submitted manuscripts are first screened by the Editor-in-Chief for suitability with the journal’s focus, scope, and author guidelines.
-
Manuscripts that do not meet the criteria may be rejected at this stage.
-
-
Plagiarism Check
-
Each manuscript is checked for similarity using plagiarism detection software.
-
Manuscripts with high similarity scores will be returned to authors for revision or directly rejected.
-
-
Reviewer Assignment
-
Manuscripts passing the screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
-
The review process is double-blind, meaning both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
-
-
Review Process
-
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript’s originality, methodological soundness, contribution to knowledge, clarity, and references.
-
Reviewers are generally given three (3) weeks to complete the review.
-
If there are three reviewers, the decision will be based on the agreement of at least two reviewers.
-
-
Editorial Decision
-
Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the Editor-in-Chief makes one of the following decisions:
-
Accept without revision
-
Minor revision
-
Major revision
-
Reject
-
-
Authors will be notified of the decision along with reviewers’ comments.
-
-
Revision Stage
-
Authors are required to revise their manuscript according to reviewers’ feedback and resubmit through OJS.
-
Revised manuscripts may be re-reviewed if necessary.
-
-
Final Decision and Acceptance
-
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on reviewers’ recommendations and the quality of the revised manuscript.
-
Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting and proofreading.
-
-
Publication
-
Finalized manuscripts are published online and assigned a DOI for indexing and citation purposes.
-