Peer Review Process

Each submission undergoes an initial editorial screening for scope, format compliance, and originality. Eligible manuscripts are sent to at least two reviewers under a double-blind procedure.

Reviewers evaluate originality, methodological rigor, strength of argument and evidence, contribution to the field, ethical compliance, and clarity of presentation.

Editorial decisions may be: accept, minor revision, major revision, resubmit for review, or reject. Authors must address all comments within the specified time. Revised manuscripts may be re-assessed by the original reviewers or by the editors. Final acceptance is conditional on successful plagiarism screening and full adherence to the journal’s guidelines.