.png)
The Essence of Civil Society in Democracy
Abstract
Abstract. Currently, the role of civil society tends to be stronger in counterbalancing state domination through a democratic system. The state's efforts to create a responsive civil society, namely continuing to instill democratic values based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article aims to examine the prospects for civil society in a democracy. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach with the type of literature study with data sources in the form of journals, books, and working papers that are relevant to deductive, inductive, and comparative data analysis. The results show that civil society in the current democracy frame is seen as being able to balance the dominance of the state in policymaking. However, if we look at it, on the other hand, it is quite difficult for us to argue with the actors and political elites, businessmen, and other elites who are not directly involved with the government so that their role is able to determine the wheels of policy as their output even though it may reduce the legitimacy of the state. This is also when we elaborate with the theory of democracy according to Robeth Dahl, where basically modern democracy today is strongly influenced by the capitalization and liberalization of the market economy sector which has a significant double impact on the prospect of a complete democracy.
Keywords: Civil Society, democracy.
Abstrak. Saat ini peran masyarakat sipil cenderung lebih kuat dalam mengimbangi dominasi negara melalui sistem demokrasi. Upaya negara mewujudkan masyarakat sipil yang responsif yaitu terus menanamkan nilai demokratis berdasarkan pancasila dan UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengulas tentang prospek masyarakat sipil dalam demokrasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan jenis studi kepustakaan dengan sumber data berupa jurnal, buku-buku, dan working paper yang relevan dengan analisis data deduktif, induktif, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat sipil dalam bingkai demokrasi saat ini dipandang mampu mengimbangin dominasi negara dalam penentuan kebijakan. Namun apabila kita cermati dilain sisi bahwa cukup sulit kita bantah terkait para aktor dan elit politik, pengusaha, dan elit yang lainya secara tidak lansung terlibat dengan pemerintah hingga peran mereka mampu menentukan roda kebijakan sebagai outputnya meski kemungkinan mengurangi legitimasi negara. Hal ini juga apabila kita elaborasi dengan teori deokrasi menurut Robeth Dahl dimana pada dasarnya demokrasi modern saat ini memang kuat dipengaruhi oleh kapitalisasi dan liberalisasi sektor ekonomi pasar yang signifikan berdampak ganda pada prospek demokrasi yang utuh.
Kata Kunci: Masyarakat Sipil, demokrasi
Keywords
Full Text:
DOWNLOADReferences
Agun Gunandjar Sudarsa. (2008). Sistem multipartai di indonesia. Jurnal Peraturan, 1–12. https://doi.org/http://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/viewFile/285/172
Armiwulan, H. (2019). Catatan Kritis Sistem Hukum Dan Praktik Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia Di Era Reformasi. University Of Surabaya Repository, 2. https://doi.org/http://repository.ubaya.ac.id/37329/
Arrobi, M. Z. (2019). Pancasila, Negara, Dan Masyarakat Sipil: Suatu Tinjauan Sosio-Historis. Jurnal Majelis Media Aspirasi Konstitusi, 11(November), 111–119. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/63
Bachtiar, F. R. (2014). Pemilu Indonesia: kiblat negara demokrasi dari berbagai refresentasi. JPP (Jurnal Politik Profetik), 2(1). https://doi.org/http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/817
Bahruddin, M. (2020). Partisipasi publik: isu agama dan politik dalam konteks demokrasi di media online. Https://Www.Researchgate.Net/Publication/338456545. https://www.researchgate.net/
Cahyono, M. (2017). Panduan Pemasyarakatan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 Dan Ketetaoan MPR Republik Indonesia. In Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI (Edisi Revi, pp. 114–137). Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI.
Christmann, P. (2018). Economic performance, quality of democracy and satisfaction with democracy. Electoral Studies, 53, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.004
Correa-Lopera, G. (2019). Demand of direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 60(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.08.004
Duija, I. N. (2017). Masyarakat Hindu Dalam Politik NKRI Menuju Masyarakat Sipil. 1(1). http://jurnal.stahnmpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/Purwadita/article/viewFile/4/3
Dwipayana, A. A. (2009). Demokrasi Biaya Tinggi Dimensi Ekonomi dalam Proses Demokrasi Elektoral di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 12(3), 257–390. https://doi.org/https://journal.ugm.ac.id/index.php/jsp/article/view/10971
Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2020). Democracy, political instability, and government tax effort in hydrocarbon-dependent countries. Resources Policy, 65(November 2019), 101530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101530
Gallier, C. (2020). Democracy and compliance in public goods games. European Economic Review, 121, 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103346
John, P., & Sjoberg, F. M. (2020). Partisan responses to democracy promotion – Estimating the causal effect of a civic information portal. World Development, 130, 104914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104914
Norman K. Densin, & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Handbook Of Qualitative Research. In Dariyatno, B. samsul Fata, Abi, & J. Rinaldi (Eds.), Pustaka Belajar (Edisi Kedu). https://doi.org/Pustakapelajar@yahoo.com
Paristiyanti Nurwadani, D. (2016). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan di perguruan tinggi. In I. Ahmad (Ed.), Thema publishing (cetakan pe). Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan TInggi.
Parmudi, M. (2017). Kebangkitan Civil Society di Indonesia. At-Taqaddum, 7(2), 295–310. https://doi.org/http://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/attaqaddum/article/viewFile/1208/951
Prasetyoningsih, N. (2014). Dampak Pemilihan Umum Serentak bagi Pembangunan Demokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1190
Putri, Y. I. (2018). Kontribusi Masyarakat Sipil Domestik dan Transnasional Dalam Memperjuangkan LGBT di Afrika Selatan 1991-2006. Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional, 7(1), 251–265. http://journal.unair.ac.id/download-fullpapers-jahi9e9c565d20full.pdf
Raharjo, M. D. (2016). Demokrasi, Agama dan masyarakat Madani. Unisia, 22(39), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol22.iss39.art3
Rahmandani, F., & Samsuri. (2019). Hak Dan Kewajiban Sebagai Dasar Nilai Intrinsik Warga Negara Dalam Membentuk Masyarakat Sipil. Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 4(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v4i1.426
Rahmatulloh. (2013). Wajah Demokrasi Jakarta Dalam Potret Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (IDI). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Sager, F. (2018). Policy evaluation and democracy: Do they fit? Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.08.004
Sandy, T. R. (2018). Menurunnya Kebebasan Berserikat Dan Berkumpul Pada Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (IDI) Lampung 2016 (Vol. 2016) [Universitas Lampung]. https://doi.org/http://digilib.unila.ac.id/33222/
Seftyono, C. (2019). Membuka Ruang Teorisasi Kepemimpinan Masyarakat Sipil: Komunitas Epistemik Sains Terbuka. https://doi.org/https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/bzu9r/
Šerek, J., & Lomičová, L. (2020). Adolescents’ transitions between different views on democracy: Examining individual-level moderators. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 66(March 2019), 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101104
Stutzer, A., Baltensperger, M., & Meier, A. N. (2019). Overstrained citizens? The number of ballot propositions and the quality of the decision process in direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 59(May), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.05.008
Thomas B. Pepinsky, R William Liddle, S. M. (2012). Indonesian Democracy and the Transformation of Political Islam Thomas. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Wahyunengseh, R. D. (2018). Forum Konsultasi Publik : Aktivis Masyarakat Sipil atau Klient Penguasa. Spirit Publik Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 32–42. https://doi.org/https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/spirit-publik/article/view/26986
Yaniawati, R. P. (2020). Penelitian Studi Kepustakaan (Issue April). https://www.google.com/search?q=Penelitian+Studi+Kepustakaan&oq=Penelitian+Studi+Kepustakaan&aqs=chrome..69i57j0j0i22i30l6.1488j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Zaini, M. (2019). Kebijakan Pemberlakuan Politik Demokrasi dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kesejahteraan Sosial. Paradigma: Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, Dan Sosial Budaya, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.33503/paradigma.v25i1.484
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jed.v6i1.4369
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 JED (Journal of Etika Demokrasi)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.