THE IMPLEMENTATION 2013 CURRICULUM IN ELTLL: SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AND AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v9i1.3542Kata Kunci:
Scientific Approach, Authentic Assessment, Complexity, 2013 Curriculum, ELTL.Abstrak
The 2013 curriculum emphasizes on active student learning with a scientific approach and authentic assessment. This paper aims to explicate the teachers’ complexity in implementing the scientific approach and authentic assessment in English language teaching process. The 2013 curriculum introduces and encourages the use of scientific approach in the learning process for all subjects including English. Scientific approach is an approach that focuses on finding facts, concepts, principles, laws and theories. By this approach, it is hoped that the students’ learning outcomes can be more attached as they do it with fact based procedure. Withal, authentic assessment is also emphasized in the 2013 curriculum, where this assessment not only focus on the final result but also on the learning process. This paper focuses on : the implementation of scientific approach and authentic assessment in English language teaching process, and the barriers faced by teachers in implementing scientific approach and authentic assessment. Qualitative descriptive was applied in this study. To obtain the data needed, interview was used as instrument in this study. There were several conclusions obtained from the results of this study; 1) The implementation of scientific approach was in accordance with approach. In terms of assessment, the English teacher has implemented the authentic assessment, that is a measurement of students’ learning outcome in three domains (cognitive assessment, affective assessment an skill). But in its implementation, this has also not been implemented in a manner maximum. 2) The barrier faced the principles or rules. In lesson plan, the teachers clearly described the steps of scientific approach with using variety of methods or techniques in teaching English, even though on the process of teaching and learning English in the class, the teacher rarely used this by the teacher in applying scientific approach was to facilitate the students in asking and answer questions among them, while in authentic assessment, the obstacles were limited time, limited facilities and infrastructure, difficulty in implementing certain models of authentic assessment, and students.
Referensi
Corebima, A.D. 2005. Authentic Assessment. http://sman1talun.sch.id/userfiles/slide%20-%20Authentic%20asesmen.pp
Daryanto. 2014. Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gava Media.
Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y.S. 2005. The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. The Sage handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousan Oak: SAGE Publications.
Fitriani. 2017. Implementing Authentic Assessment of Curriculum 2013: Teachers’ Problems and Solutions. Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ), Vo. 2 No. 4.
Gulikers, J.T.M., Bastiens, T.J., & Kirschner, P.A. 2004 A Five Dimnesional Framework of Authentic Assessment.Etr. Vol. 52. No. 3
Johnson, E.B. 2009. Contextual Teaching and Learning. Bandung: MLC.
Karar, E. E. dan Yenice, N. 2012. The investigation of scientific process skill level of elementary education 8th grade students in view of demographic features. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Mueller, J. 2008. Authentic assessment toolbox. Retrieved on 18 October 2014 from http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/index.htm. University of Wisconsin.
Nurman, M. 2018. Implementasi Authentic Assessment Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Pada Madrasah Aliyah Swasta Di Kecamatan Selong Kabupaten Lombok Timur. El-Tsaqafah Vol. 16 No. 2
Rusman. 2015. Pemebelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Syaodih, N. 2007. Curriculum Development Theory and Practice [Pengembangan kurikulum teori dan praktik]. New York: Rosdakarya.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
