PROBING-PROMPTING LEARNING IN TEACHING SPEAKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v9i1.3481Keywords:
probing-prompting, speaking, learning modelAbstract
Based on the result of this study implementation of probing-prompting learning to the ability to speak and curiosity in learning English. That thing is shown by some conclusions as the following: (1) ability to talk about learning model probing-prompting achieve classic equipment; (2) capacity talk to students about models learning probing-prompting better than ability talk to students about models conventional learning; (3) curiosity students on the probing-prompting learning model better rather than a students curiosity about the model conventional learning.References
Ananda, E. Sofian, & salam, U. (2017). Improving students’ speaking performance by using talking stick method. Jurnal Pendidikan dan pembelajaran Untan, 6 (8), 2-1. Retrived from http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/
Arens, a. K., Morin, A. J. S., & Watermann, R. (2015). Relations between classroom disciplinary problems and student motivation: Achievement as a potential mediator? Learning and Instruction, 39, 184–193. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.001
Hakim, M.A.R., 2015. Experienced EFL teachers’ challenges and strategies in teaching speaking for introvert students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 48(4), pp.437-446
Hadi, M. S., & Emzir, E. 2016. Improving English Speaking Ability through Mobile Assisted Language Learning (Mall) Learning Model. IJLECR - International Journal of Language Education and Culture Review, 2, 71–74. https://doi.org/10.21009/ ijlecr.022.09
Hakim, M.A.R., 2017. Teachers’ Strategies in Teaching Speaking Lesson on Introvert Students in Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Ja-Alhaq Bengkulu. Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 21(1), pp.23-30
Leo, S., 2013. A Challenging Book to Practice Teaching in English. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi
Linnenbrink, E.A., Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an Enable for Academic Success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313 – 327
McInerney, D. M., Cheng, R. W.-Y., Mok, M. M. C., & Lam, a K. H.
(2012). Academic self-concept and learning strategies: Direction of effect on student academic achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(3), 249–269. http://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12451020
Nurmayasari, E., & Rahmawati, S. 2016. A Comparative Study between Extroverted and Introverted Students and Their Speaking Ability. English Journal, 15(2), 20-29
Rizqiningsih, S., & Hadi, M.S. 2019. Multiple Intelligences (MI) on Developing Speaking Skills. English Language in Focus (ELIF), 1(2), 127- 136. 10.24853/elif.1.2.127-136
Yolanda, D., & Hadi, M.S. 2019. Using Puppet Games in Teaching Speaking for Tenth Graders of Senior High School. English Language in Focus (ELIF), 2(1), 1-8. 10.24853/elif.2.1.1-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
