The Dynamics of Agrarian Conflict Governance between PT Lonsum and the Kajang Indigenous Community from the Perspective of Karl Marx's Conflict Theory

Penulis

  • Eko Pratama Pendidikan Sosiologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Syarifudin Syarifudin Pendidikan Sosiologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Firdaus Firdaus Pendidikan Sosiologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26618/3r8xpb63

Kata Kunci:

Agrarian Conflict, Kajang Indigenous People , Land

Abstrak

This research aims to analyze the dynamics of agrarian conflict between PT London Sumatra Indonesia Tbk (PT Lonsum) and the Kajang indigenous community in Bulukumba Regency, South Sulawesi. The conflict arises from overlapping land claims, non-transparent extensions of plantation concessions (Hak Guna Usaha/HGU), and the lack of recognition of indigenous land rights. This study employs a qualitative case study approach using interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that the agrarian conflict represents a manifestation of class struggle as described by Karl Marx, where PT Lonsum, as a representation of capital owners, receives state legitimacy to control the land, while the indigenous community faces subordination and marginalization. The Kajang people have carried out various forms of resistance—symbolic, advocative, and collective—including the involvement of youth in protests and legal advocacy. The study concludes that resolving agrarian conflicts requires more than legal-formal approaches; it demands recognition of indigenous land rights, community empowerment, and sustainable social justice

Referensi

Ansar, N. (2019). Perjuangan Masyarakat Adat Kajang untuk Mendapatkan Kembali Wilayah Adatnya. Researchgate.Net, 1–9.

Assyakurrohim, D., Ikhram, D., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2022). Metode Studi Kasus dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1951

Barnasaputri, I. I. (2021). Jalan Panjang Pengakuan Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Melalui Peraturan Daerah: Beberapa Persoalan yang Belum Selesai. Notaire, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v4i1.22805

Brewer, A. (2000). Kajian Kritis Das Kapital Karl Marx (M. Santoso, Ed.; 3rd ed.). TePLOK PRESS.

Dewi, S. H. S., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Najicha, F. U. (2020). Kedudukan Dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Adat Dalam Mendiami Hutan Adat. Legislatif, 79–92.

Komnas HAM. (2021). Laporan Tahunan 2020 Pemjuan & Penegakan HAM di Era Pandemi Covid 19 (A. Arif, Ed.). Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia.

Konflik, K., Teori, D., Sosial, K., Pemikiran, D., Marx, K., Prayogi, A., Nasrullah, R.,

Setiawan, S., Setyawan, M. A., Kh, U., & Wahid, A. (n.d.). The Concept of Conflict and the Theory of Social Conflict in Karl Marx’s Thought (Vol. 1, Issue 1).

Kurniawan, A. (2024). Kompleksitas Teori Konflik Karl Marx Pandangannya Terhadap Kekuasaan Dan Negara. 30, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.33503/paradigma.v30i2.4446

Mappatunru, A., & Zainuddin, S. I. (2025). Dari Primitive Accumulation ke Intimate Exclusion: Dinamika Kelas dalam Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Kabupaten Mamuju Tengah From Primitive Accumulation to Intimate Exclusion: Class Dynamics in Palm Oil Plantations in Mamuju Tengah Regency. https://doi.org/10.38026/jhsj.v7i1.71

Mukti, I., & Syarifuddin, M. (2024). Social Interaction and Solidarity in the Context of Sipakatau in the Government Workplace in Pangkep Regency.

Prayogi, A., Nasrullah, R., Setiawan, S., & Setyawan, M. A. (2025). Konsep Konflik dan Teori Konflik Sosial dalam Pemikiran Karl Marx. SiNORA, 1(1), 1–11.

Rahma, R. M., Fauzi, A. M., & Swarizona, S. (2022). Kesadaran dan Perjuangan Buruh Jawa Timur Dalam Menolak Upah Murah Di Era Pandemi. Community: Pengawas Dinamika Sosial, 8(1), 93–103.

Raya, D., Rizky, R., Robiatul, C., Az-zahra, J., Azizah, W., & Rafa, M. (2024). Sumber Kekuasaan Dalam Negara: Analisis Berdasarkan Teori Konflik Karl Marx. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Hukum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i2.810

Rusli, M. (2021). Merancang penelitian kualitatif dasar/deskriptif dan studi kasus. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 2(1), 48–60.

Sevrina, G. I. (2020). Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Praktik Prostitusi di Indonesia. Law and Justice, 5(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v5i1.9216

Suardi, H. (2020). IMPLIKASI SOSIAL KONTRIBUSI BURUH WANITA TERHADAP

KESEJAHTERAAN KELUARGA KABUPATEN ENREKANG. Jurnal Neo Societal; Vol, 5(4).

Suyanto, B. (2005). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Kencana Predana Media Group.

Tohari, A., Saputra, D. Y., S, D. Novrian., Yanuardy, D., Taschler, L., Muntaza,

Swanvri, & Soumahu, R. (2021). Dinamika Konflik & Kekerasan Di Indonesia. Institiut Titian Perdamaian & Yayasan TIFA, xii+242.

Wahid, M., & Tualeka, N. (2017). TEORI KONFLIK SOSIOLOGI KLASIK DAN MODERN.

Wiradi, G. (2009). Reforma Agraria: Perjalanan yang Belum Berakhir (N. Fauzi, Ed.). Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria

Diterbitkan

2025-12-21

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles