Regionalism and Migration Governance: The Institutional Role of ASEAN in Complementary Pathways for Labour Mobility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/x4w40a64Kata Kunci:
ASEAN; Complementary Pathways; Labour Mobility; Migration Governance; Migrant Workers’ RightsAbstrak
This paper examines the institutional role of ASEAN in developing complementary pathways for labour mobility in Southeast Asia. Moving beyond normative debates on ASEAN’s relevance as a regional institution, the study explores how the region’s distinctive institutional design, grounded in state sovereignty, non-interference, and consensus, shapes migration governance. Using a qualitative approach, this study draws on ASEAN policy documents, national labour regulations, and reports from international organisations such as the IOM, ILO, and UNHCR. Findings show that ASEAN’s complementary pathways are primarily realised through temporary labour schemes, bilateral agreements, and regional normative frameworks such as the 2007 ASEAN Declaration and the 2017 ASEAN Consensus on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers. While these instruments provide an important normative foundation, their soft law status results in uneven implementation and heavy reliance on national political commitment. The high proportion of undocumented migrant workers and fragmented protection mechanisms underscore the limitations of ASEAN’s consensus-based, intergovernmental model. The study highlights the dual role of complementary pathways as both a bridge between labour market demands and migrant rights protection and as a reflection of ASEAN’s institutional constraints. It argues that strengthening these pathways requires expanding regional coordination, integrating international labour standards, and positioning rights protection as a central pillar of migration governance rather than as an adjunct to labour mobility. By comparing ASEAN with the European Union’s more integrated model, the paper underscores ASEAN’s potential to develop a flexible, inclusive, and progressively rights-based approach suited to the political and economic realities of the Global South.
Referensi
Anderson, J. T. (2021). Managing labour migration in Malaysia: Foreign workers and the challenges of ‘control’beyond liberal democracies. Third World Quarterly, 42(1), 86–104.
Asis, R. P., & Maningat, C. L. (2023). The “ASEAN Way” in migration governance. In The Palgrave handbook of South–South migration and inequality (pp. 679–698). Springer International Publishing Cham.
Aziz, S. N. A., & Basir, S. M. (2021). Protection of Migrant Workers under the ICMW: Incompatibility with Malaysian Laws and Position in ASEAN. Hasanuddin Law Review, 7(3), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v7i3.3066
Boutier, I., & Maganaris, E. (2025). The Risks of Labour Trafficking for Migrant Workers: A Focus on Human Trafficking and AI. https://researchonline.gcu.ac.uk/en/publications/the-risks-of-labour-trafficking-for-migrant-workers-a-focus-on-hu
Capaldi, M. P. (2023). Present-Day Migration in Southeast Asia: Evolution, Flows and Migration Dynamics. In S. Petcharamesree & M. P. Capaldi (Eds.), IMISCOE Research Series (pp. 1–19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25748-3_1
Çingir, Ö. F. (2022). Violations of the human rights of migrant workers in Southeast Asia. In Marginalisation and Human Rights in Southeast Asia (pp. 31–48). Routledge.
Dewi, U. N. M. (2024). Forced migration in Southeast Asian: policies and migration governance. Southeast Asian Conference on Migration and Development (SEACMD 2023), 132–150.
Elliott, K. A. (2022). Handbook on globalisation and labour standards. In K. A. Elliott (Ed.), Handbook on Globalisation and Labour Standards. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977371
Fitria, N. (2025). A Critical Review of the ASEAN Convention on the Protection of Women Migrant Workers: Gaps, Challenges, and Recommendations. JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset Dan Konsultan Sosial, 7(1), 51–62.
Fratzke, S., Zanzuchi, M. B., Hooper, K., Beirens, H., Kainz, L., Benson, N., Bateman, E., & Bolter, J. (2021). Refugee Resettlement and Complementary Pathways Opportunities for Growth. Geneva and Brussels: UNHCR and MPI Europe.
Gaffar, H., & Al Brashdi, S. (2025). Legal frameworks for workforce mobility and employment regulations in ASEAN: challenges and efforts in aligning domestic labour laws with regional standards. Labor History, 1–29.
Geddes, A. (2021). Governing migration beyond the state: Europe, North America, South America, and Southeast Asia in a global context. In Governing Migration Beyond the State: Europe, North America, South America, and Southeast Asia in a Global Context. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842750.001.0001
Ishikawa, K. (2021). The ASEAN Economic Community and ASEAN economic integration. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(1), 24–41.
Jetschke, A. (2019). Does forced migration increase regional human rights commitment? The cases of Malaysia and Thailand in ASEAN. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(5), 705–728.
Jetschke, A., & Murray, P. (2012). Diffusing Regional Integration: The EU and Southeast Asia. In West European Politics (Vol. 35, Issue 1, pp. 174–191). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631320
Jetschke, A., & Theiner, P. (2020). Time to move on! Why the discussion about ASEAN’s relevance is outdated. The Pacific Review, 33(3–4), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1673803
Lanna, N. (2022). Between the hammer of non-interference and the anvil of third-party influence: ASEAN, APT and EAS vis-à-vis the Rohingya migration crisis. In Migration Governance in Asia (pp. 126–143). Routledge.
Lee, H.-A. (2025). Facilitating Gainful Labour Migration in Southeast Asia Remains an Elusive Task. ISEAS Perspective 2025/37.
Low, C. C. (2021). Legal Reforms in Protecting Migrant Workers’ Welfare in Malaysia: Labor Law and Social Security. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 14(1), 59–80.
Loxa, A. (2023). Complementary pathways: pledging protection at the edges of EU law. European Journal of Migration and Law, 25(2), 226–248.
Marah, T. S. (2025). HUMANITARIAN LAW AND ASEAN: ANALYZING REGIONAL COMMITMENT AND HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MECHANISMS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. Journal of Governance and Public Administration, 2(2), 495–511.
Martínez Marco, M. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Regional Integration Mechanisms in the EU and ASEAN: A Study of EU and ASEAN’s Pathways towards Regional Integration.
Moretti, S. (2021). Between refugee protection and migration management: The quest for coordination between UNHCR and IOM in the Asia-Pacific region. Third World Quarterly, 42(1), 34–51.
Nadalutti, E., & Rüland, J. (2024). Cross-border regionalism in the EU and ASEAN: another dimension of the “varieties of regionalism.” Journal of European Integration, 46(8), 1193–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2329636
Ness, I. (2021). Temporary labour and worker exploitation: Southeast Asian migration to Malaysia. In Handbook of Migration and Global Justice (pp. 26–48). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pitakdumrongkit, K. (2023). Regional economic integration: the ASEAN Economic Community and beyond. In The Elgar Companion to ASEAN (pp. 62–75). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Plummer, M. G., Petri, P. A., & Zhai, F. (2014). Assessing the impact of ASEAN economic integration on labour markets. ILO Asia-Pacific Working Paper, Forthcoming.
Prianto, A. L., Amri, A. R., & Ajis, M. N. (2023). Governance and Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers in Malaysia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 7(2), 214. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v7i2.44185
Prianto, A. L., Amri, A. R., & Ilik, G. (2023). Governing Migrant Workers Post-COVID-19 in Southeast Asia: Vulnerability, Mitigation and Transformative Agenda BT - Political Economy of Development in the Global South Post-COVID-19 Pandemic (H. Adam & R. Rena (eds.); pp. 139–164). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4074-5_7
Putri, A. R., & Sari, V. P. (2021). ASEAN Consensus on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers sebagai rezim perlindungan pekerja migran berketerampilan rendah di ASEAN. Padjadjaran Journal of International Relations, 3(2), 242–264.
Rother, S. (2025). International organisations are people, too: IOM’s role as coordinator of the UN migration network and the socialisation of international organisations. Geopolitics, 30(4), 1553–1580.
Soriano, E., & Reyes, M. (2024). The impact of ASEAN regional integration on the cross-border movement of local labor in the Philippines. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 3(6), 8–16.
Srinivas, S., & Sivaraman, S. (2021). Understanding Relevant Sustainable Development Goal Targets Related to Labour Migration in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic.
Sundram, P. (2023). ASEAN as network governance: An alternative lens to evaluate policymaking and performance. F1000Research, 12, 1073.
Sundram, P. (2025). Network governance in ASEAN: fostering regional cooperation and integration. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1434595.
Tan, H.-L. (2022). Intergovernmental Yet Dynamically Expansive: Concordance Legalization as an Alternative Regional Trading Arrangement in ASEAN and Beyond. European Journal of International Law, 33(2), 341–380.
Triandafyllidou, A. (2022). Temporary migration: category of analysis or category of practice? In Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (Vol. 48, Issue 16, pp. 3847–3859). Taylor & Francis.
Uchiyama, Y., Furuoka, F., Akhir, M. N. M., & MN, M. (2022). Gig workers, social protection and labour market inequality: Lessons from Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 56(3), 165–184.
van Harten, E. B. (2023). Complementary pathways as “genuine and effective access to means of legal entry” in the reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights: Legal and practical implications. European Journal of Migration and Law, 25(2), 200–225.
van Selm, J. (2023). Whose pathways are they? The top-down/bottom-up conundrum of complementary pathways for refugees. European Journal of Migration and Law, 25(2), 137–163.
Vankova, Z. (2022). Refugees as Migrant Workers after the Global Compacts? Can Labour Migration Serve as a Complementary Pathway for People in Need of Protection into Sweden and Germany? Laws, 11(6), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11060088
Varjonen, S., Kinnunen, A., Paavola, J.-M., Ramadan, F., Raunio, M., van Selm, J., & Vilhunen, T. (2021). Student, Worker or Refugee? How complementary pathways for people in need of international protection work in practice.
https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/163604
Yuda, T. K., Kim, M., Pholpark, A., & Bin Aedy Rahman, H. N. (2022). Unmasking the social policy responses of COVID-19 in four Southeast Asian Nations: institutional patterns and policy adjustment. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 32(4), 294–317.
