DAMPAK PSIKOLOGI MAKIAN BAHASA INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI STRATA SOSIAL MASYARAKAT BAHASA

Arfan Rauf

Abstract


This study was an observational research that starts from planning, implementing, and drawing conclusions. The research subjects were people who lived in Tamalatea Village, Makassar City, South Sulawesi, based on Social strata as many as 15 people. Data collection techniques were observation, tapping, fishing line, see, note, and record. All data obtained were analyzed through stages (1) grouping similar data, (2) reading the data as a whole, (3) analyzing data with the method of "intra-lingual and equivalent extra lingual methods", (4) compiling interpretations, and (5) describing data to be a conclusion.

The results of the study showed that (1) invective is not acceptable in the form of language communication in general. (2) Invective can be accepted in certain language groups. (3) Invective is used to intimidate, control, reveal disappointment, wonder, personal protection, disrupt, and popularity. (4) There are similarities and differences in the use of invective in each of the social strata of the language community, both based on the form and reference, purpose, and character displayed. (5) Invective psychologically has negative impact on users and recipients.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Brennan, James E. 2006. Sejarah dan Sistem Psikologi. Terjemahan oleh Nurmala Sari Fajar. Jakarta. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Budiarjo. 2009. Mengelola Keinginan (on line). http://www.blogbudiarjo.co.cc (28 September 2010).

Chaer, Abdul. 2003. Psikolinguistik: Kajian Teoretik. Jakarta. PT Rineka Cipta.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia: Edisi Keempat. Jakarta. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2009. Kamus Tesaurus Alfabetis Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung. PT Mizan Pustaka.

Dharmojo. 2005. Sistem Simbol Munaba Waropen Papua. Jakarta. Pusat Bahasa.

Farozin, Muh. dan Fathiyah, Nur. Pemahaman Tingkah Laku: Buku Pegangan FIP UNY. Jakarta. PT Rineka Cipta.

Indrawati, Dianita. 2009. Pengertian Perilaku (on line). http://www.dianitaindra-wati.blogspot.com (3 September 2010).

Mahsun. 2007. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Marhiyanto, Bambang. 2007. Penerapan “Al Malik” untuk Mencapai Keberuntungan (on line). http://www.madinatulummah.blogspot.com (28 September 2010).

Moleong, Lexy J. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mujib, Abdul dan Mudzakir, Jusuf. 2002. Nuansa-Nuansa Psikologi Islam. Jakarta. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Nevid, Jeffrey, dkk. 2005. Psikologi Abnormal. Jakarta. Penerbitan Erlangga.

On line, Januari 2009: What is Abuse?. http://www.abusivelove.com (3 September 2010).

Purwo, Bambang Kaswanti. 2004. Kajian Serba Linguistik: untuk Anton Moeliono Pereksa Bahasa. Jakarta. Gunung Mulia dan UKI Atmajaya.

Putu Wijana, I Dewa dan Rohamdi Muhammad. 2006. Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Ramlan, M. 2005. Ilmu Bahasa Indonesia: Sintaksis. Yogyakarta. CV. Karyono.

Rosidin, Odin, 2010. Kajian Bentuk, Kategori, dan Sumber Makian, serta Alasan Penggunaan Makian. Jakarta. FIB-Universitas Indonesia.

Setyo. 2007. Manusia dalam Perspektif Psikologi (on line). http://www.setiyo.blog-spot.com (2 OKtober 2010).

Sumarsono dan Partana, Paina. 2007. Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta. Karjasama Sabda dan Pustaka Pelajar.

Syamsuddin dan Vismaia, S. Damaianti. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pndidikan Bahasa. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Verhaar, J.W.M. 2004. Asas-Asas Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta. Gajah Mada University Press.

Walgito, Bimo. 2010. Dasar-Dasar Psikologi. (on line). http://www.bimo.blog-spot.com (1 OKtober 2010).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jk.v4i2.2115

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter