LANGUAGE AND VISUAL STYLE IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE: REFLECTIONS ON IDENTITY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC

Erwin Erwin, Sri Maryani

Abstract


This study explores how language choices and visual styles in political communication serve to reflect candidates’ identities, express ideological narratives, and shape public perception. Utilizing a qualitative approach with ethnographic methods, the research involves participatory observation, in-depth interviews with campaign teams, and analysis of visual campaign materials from local political contexts. Grounded in sociopragmatic stylistics theory, the study examines how verbal and visual elements interact within specific socio-cultural frameworks to construct persuasive political messages. Findings show that the strategic use of local languages and culturally embedded symbols enhances emotional engagement between candidates and constituents. Language that aligns with regional identity fosters trust and relatability, reinforcing the authenticity of the candidate’s image. Visual aspects such as color selection, layout design, typography, and symbolic imagery play a crucial role in reinforcing ideological positioning and constructing coherent public personas. These visual cues often communicate values, aspirations, and affiliations more powerfully than verbal language alone. However, the research also uncovers the potential for dissonance when verbal messages are not visually supported or when visuals contradict spoken rhetoric. Such inconsistencies can weaken the intended message and lead to misinterpretation or distrust among the public. The study’s novelty lies in its integration of ethnographic methodology with sociopragmatic stylistics to examine local-level political campaign communication an area still underexplored in Indonesian political studies. These insights provide valuable implications for academics, political strategists, and communication practitioners in designing more coherent, context-sensitive, and impactful political campaigns that resonate with target audiences.


Keywords


political communication, political identity, sociopragmastylistics, visual discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allal-Chérif, O., Aránega, A. Y., & Sánchez, R. C. (2021). Intelligent recruitment: How to identify, select, and retain talents from around the world using artificial intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120822.

Aslan, E. (2024). Bite-sized language teaching in the digital wild: Relational pedagogy and micro-celebrity English teachers on Instagram. System, 121, 103238.

Bateman John, A. (2014). Text and Image: a Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divine. London.

Brems, C., Temmerman, M., Graham, T., & Broersma, M. (2017). Personal branding on Twitter: How employed and freelance journalists stage themselves on social media. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 443–459.

Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.

Carpenter, S., Kanver, D., & Timmons, R. (2017). It’s about me: A study of journalists’ self-presentation of their visual and verbal selves. Journalism Practice, 11(10), 1246–1266.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory in global perspective: Reviews by international researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074–1084.

Clarke, A. J. (2021). The aesthetics of social aspiration. In Home possessions (pp. 23–45). Routledge.

Dahl, T., & Fløttum, K. (2017). Verbal–visual harmony or dissonance? A news values analysis of multimodal news texts on climate change. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 124–131.

El-dali, H. M. (2021). A stylistic analysis of Henry Fielding’s Tom Jones: a socio-pragmatic view. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–20.

Erwin, E. (2023). Ekspresi Tutur Pejabat Publik dalam Wacana Percakapan Virtual pada Platform Media Sosial Facebook. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 7(1).

Espinosa, R., & Stoop, J. (2021). Do people really want to be informed? Ex-ante evaluations of information-campaign effectiveness. Experimental Economics, 24(4), 1131–1155.

Fairclough, N. (2014). Critical language awareness. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2023). Technologization of discourse. In Texts and Practices Revisited (pp. 27–42). Routledge.

Farkas, X., & Bene, M. (2021). Images, politicians, and social media: Patterns and effects of politicians’ image-based political communication strategies on social media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 119–142.

Farquhar, J., Michels, N., & Robson, J. (2020). Triangulation in industrial qualitative case study research: Widening the scope. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 160–170.

Fatma, F., Prayitno, H. J., Jamaludin, N., Jha, G. K., & Badri, T. I. (2019). Directive speech acts in academic discourse: ethnography of communication from gender perspective in higher education. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 2(1), 27–46.

Gepp, A., & Kumar, K. (2015). Predicting financial distress: A comparison of survival analysis and decision tree techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 54, 396–404.

Gong, Z. H., & Bucy, E. P. (2016). When style obscures substance: Visual attention to display appropriateness in the 2012 presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 83(3), 349–372.

Han, S. H., & Li, A. Z. (2023). Community Engagement. In A Hundred Stories: Industrial Heritage Changes China (pp. 31–115). Springer.

Hatherell, M. (2014). Repertoires of Representation and an Application to Indonesia’s Jokowi. Representation, 50(4), 439–451.

Israel, J., Marschall, S., & Schultze, M. (2017). Cognitive dissonance and the effects of Voting Advice Applications on voting behaviour: evidence from the European Elections 2014. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(1), 56–74.

Jones, R. (2014). Discourse and creativity. Routledge.

King, P. E. (2019). Religion and identity: The role of ideological, social, and spiritual contexts. In Beyond the self (pp. 197–204). Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). The semiotic landscape. In Language in Use (pp. 344–349). Routledge.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Kucharska, W., & Mikołajczak, P. (2018). Personal branding of artists and art-designers: necessity or desire? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27(3), 249–261.

Lagazio, C., & Querci, F. (2018). Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success. Journal of Business Research, 90, 318–324.

Lilleker, D. G. (2015). Interactivity and branding: Public political communication as a marketing tool. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1–2), 111–128.

Luckmann, T., Kaden, T., & Schnettler, B. (2022). The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. Routledge.

Lyons-Padilla, S., Gelfand, M. J., Mirahmadi, H., Farooq, M., & Van Egmond, M. (2015). Belonging nowhere: Marginalization & radicalization risk among Muslim immigrants. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(2), 1–12.

Maryani, S., & Erwin, E. (2018). Berbahasa: Potret Nasionalisme Generasi Bangsa. Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 6(2), 51–55.

Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.

Miner, M., Ghobary, B., Dowson, M., & Proctor, M.-T. (2014). Spiritual attachment in Islam and Christianity: Similarities and differences. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 17(1), 79–93.

Modood, T. (2016). Muslims, Religious Equality and Secularism 1. In Contesting secularism (pp. 69–86). Routledge.

Mohammad, S. M., Zhu, X., Kiritchenko, S., & Martin, J. (2015). Sentiment, emotion, purpose, and style in electoral tweets. Information Processing & Management, 51(4), 480–499.

Osland, J. S. (2017). An overview of the global leadership literature. Global Leadership, 57–116.

Oswick, C., & Noon, M. (2014). Discourses of diversity, equality and inclusion: trenchant formulations or transient fashions? British Journal of Management, 25(1), 23–39.

Otterbeck, J. (2016). Experiencing Islam: Narratives about faith by young adult muslims in Malmö and Copenhagen. In Everyday Lived Islam in Europe (pp. 115–134). Routledge.

Panjwani, F. (2016). Towards an overlapping consensus: Muslim teachers’ views on fundamental British values. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(3), 329–340.

Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Barnes, T. D. (2020). Women, politics, and power: A global perspective. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Rau, H., Goggins, G., & Fahy, F. (2018). From invisibility to impact: Recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research. Research Policy, 47(1), 266–276.

Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2017). Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 US Presidential candidates. Discourse, Context & Media, 16, 1–11.

Rothgerber, H. (2020). Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals. Appetite, 146, 104511.

Setyosari, P., & Kamdi, W. (2021). Exploration of Moral Integrity Education and Superior Cadre Leadership at Madrasah Boarding School Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 753–774.

Shah, V. P., Yacobi, A., Rădulescu, F. Ş., Miron, D. S., & Lane, M. E. (2015). A science based approach to topical drug classification system (TCS). International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 491(1–2), 21–25.

Sifaki, E., & Papadopoulou, M. (2015). Advertising modern art: a semiotic analysis of posters used to communicate about the Turner Prize award. Visual Communication, 14(4), 457–484.

Singh, S. P., & Roy, J. (2014). Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting. Electoral Studies, 34, 89–99.

Spradley, J. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press.

Stevenson, H. (2014). Promoting racial literacy in schools: Differences that make a difference. Teachers College Press.

Ta’a, A., Hashim, K. F., Abu Bakar, M. S., & Mohd Radzi, L. (2014). Integrity modeling-a study among Malaysian academic management officers. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 3(1), 170–176.

Van der Hel, S., & Biermann, F. (2017). The authority of science in sustainability governance: A structured comparison of six science institutions engaged with the Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 211–220.

Waugh, L. R., Catalano, T., Masaeed, K. Al, Hong Do, T., & Renigar, P. G. (2016). Critical discourse analysis: Definition, approaches, relation to pragmatics, critique, and trends. Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, 71–135.

Wessells, M. G. (2015). Bottom-up approaches to strengthening child protection systems: Placing children, families, and communities at the center. Child Abuse & Neglect, 43, 8–21.

Wodak, R., & Forchtner, B. (2018). The Routledge handbook of language and politics. Routledge London.

Yeoh, B. S. A. (2020). The global cultural city? Spatial imagineering and politics in the (multi) cultural marketplaces of South-east Asia. Culture-Led Urban Regeneration, 102–115.

Zou, S. (2019). When nationalism meets hip-hop: Aestheticized politics of ideotainment in China. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 16(3), 178–195.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/konfiks.v12i1.18435

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL KONFIKS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Journal Konfiks is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.