Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal ini berfokus pada hukum Ekonomi Islam dan menyajikan perkembangan melalui publikasi artikel dari hasil penelitian untuk menyajikan sumber-sumber rujukan ilmiah yang besifat pengembangan. RUANG LINGKUP Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah yaitu:

Hukum Ekonomi Syariah

Manajemen Ekonomi Syariah

Entrepreneurship Islam

Digitalisasi Ekonomi Syariah

Hukum Muamalah


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Publication Ethics

Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, with registered number ISSN 2549-4872 (Print), ISSN 2654-4970 (Online) is a peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online and published two times a year. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Department of Shariah Economic Law, Faculty of Islamic, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar as publisher of Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


Screening for Plagiarism

Naskah yang diserahkan ke jurnal ini akan diperiksa menggunakan turnitin. Persentase tingkat similarity yang dipersyaratkan adalah maksimal 20%


Peer Review Process

Every manuscript submitted to the editor will be selected through an initial review process by the Editorial Board. Then, the article will be given to the peer reviewers and will continue to double blind peer-review process. After that, the article will be returned to the author for revision. It takes a very long time before publishing a quality article.

Peer Reviewers will assess the substantial and technical aspects of the article. Peer Reviewers working for Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah are experts in the field of economic law, fiqh muamalah, and sharia economic issues. They are vastly experience in managing prestigious journals and have a broad track record of publications in reputable international journals.



Biaya Publikasi

Jurnal Ini Membebankan Biaya Penulis Sebagai Berikut.

Pengiriman Artikel: 0 (Rp)

Penulis tidak diharuskan membayar Biaya Pengiriman Artikel sebagai bagian dari proses pengiriman.

Biaya Publikasi Artikel (APC): 500.000 (IDR)

Jika makalah yang Anda kirimkan diterima untuk publikasi, Anda akan diminta untuk membayar APC untuk menutupi biaya publikasi.

Review & Publikasi Fast-Track: 750.000 (IDR)

Dengan pembayaran biaya ini, proses review, keputusan editorial, dan pemberitahuan penulis dijamin akan berlangsung dalam waktu 7-14 hari kerja. Silakan hubungi staf editorial untuk mendiskusikan proses tersebut.

Biaya publikasi ini tidak akan mempengaruhi keputusan editor untuk menerima atau menolak artikel. Jika naskah dinyatakan diterima untuk diterbitkan, penulis akan menerima Letter of Acceptance (LoA) dengan informasi lengkap untuk membayar biaya.

Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah menyediakan layanan ini bersifat pilihan (opsional) untuk membantu penulis yang mendesak untuk publikasi dengan tidak mengorbankan kualitas.  Jalur special ini dianggap sebagai cara terbaik untuk menyebarluaskan artikel terpilih ke publik.