Public Space as Resistance: Kaltim Kamisan and Indonesia’s Democratic Restrictions

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/6fbq0h76

Authors

  • M. Jamil Nur Departement of Government Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda
  • Niken Nurmiyati Departement of Government Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-6882
  • Alberto Noviano Patty Departement of Government Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda
  • Paisal Akbar Departement of Government Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. Universitas Mulawarman

Abstract

This study is motivated by the narrowing of civic space in Indonesia, where constitutional guarantees of freedom of expression increasingly encounter administrative, spatial, and political restrictions in practice. This study aims to analyze how public space is utilized as a form of civil society resistance through Aksi Kamisan East Kalimantan in responding to democratic restrictions. Using a qualitative descriptive case study approach, the research was conducted in Samarinda, East Kalimantan, through direct observation, documentation, and semi-structured in-depth interviews with five purposively selected informants consisting of movement organizers, participants, and an academic observer. Data were analyzed using interactive and thematic analysis grounded in Gramsci’s theory of hegemony and counter-hegemony. The findings show that Aksi Kamisan East Kalimantan utilizes Tepian Mahakam and the East Kalimantan Governor’s Office as strategic arenas for articulating human rights, environmental, indigenous, and social justice issues through peaceful symbolic actions. The movement faces administrative control, intimidation, limitations on public expression, digital attacks, and disruption of protest infrastructure, yet it transforms public space into a site of political education, collective memory, and participatory democratic engagement. This study concludes that public space functions as a contested arena where civil society negotiates, resists, and reclaims democratic participation amid local restrictions. The novelty of this study lies in positioning public space as a localized counter-hegemonic arena shaped by socio-environmental conflicts and democratic constraints in East Kalimantan. The study contributes theoretically to debates on democracy, public space, and social movements, while practically emphasizing the importance of inclusive public spaces in strengthening participatory democracy.

Author Biographies

Niken Nurmiyati, Departement of Government Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda

Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia

Alberto Noviano Patty, Departement of Government Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda

Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia

References

[1] Aditya Yudistira, & Purwo Husodo. (2022). Jalan Panjang Pencarian Keadilan: Aksi Kamisan Jakarta Tahun 2007-2021. Jurnal Ceteris Paribus, Vol. 1, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.25077/jcp.v1i2.1-10.2022

[2] Amri Wibowo, G., Alfin Imanullah, M., Religia Saintika, H., & Reizha Isfany, F. (2024). Media of Law and Sharia Pembatasan Oligarki dalam Mewujudkan Sistem Demokrasi di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v5i3.102

[3] Andini, L. A., Fadiyah, D., & Nugroho, S. S. (2024). Menelaah Peran Aksi Kamisan dalam Pembentukan Strategi Gerakan. Journal of Political Issues, 6(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.33019/jpi.v6i1.203

[4] Angga, S., Poa, A. A., Rikardus, F., Magister, P., Keilahian, F., Tinggi, S., Teologi, F., & Sasana, W. (2023). Etika Komunikasi Netizen Indonesia di Media Sosial sebagai Ruang Demokrasi dalam Telaah Ruang Publik Jurgen Habermas. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v6i3.59229

[5] Aringga, R. D., & Meuraksa, M. A. E.-W. (2025). Civil Liberties in the Midst of the Threat of Disinformation: Protests and Constitutional Law Challenges in the Post-Truth Era. Abdurrauf Social Science, 2(2), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.70742/arsos.v2i2.373

[6] Atmojo, B. T. (2021). New Social Movements (A Case Study of Aksi Kamisan in Jakarta). Forum Ilmu Sosial, 48(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.15294/fis.v48i1.30780

[7] Belkheir Mohamed Ait Aoudia. (2024). Legal Certainty of Rights and Freedoms in Algeria: Beyond the Constitutionalization. Statute Law Review, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae036

[8] Ciocchini, P., & Khoury, S. (2021). Thinking in a Gramscian way: Reflections on Gramsci and law. In Research Handbook on Law and Marxism, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119863.00014

[9] Cornell, A., Gafuri, A., & Janneh, S. (2026). DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNITED NATIONS DEMOCRACY PROMOTION THROUGH CIVIL SOCIETY EMPOWERMENT A case study of The Gambia’s democratic transition. https://doi.org/https://hdl.handle.net/2077/91212

[10] Douaisia, K. (2025). Constitutional Democracy: Principles and Dimensions. Journal of Science and Knowledge Horizons, 5(01), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.34118/jskp.v5i01.4253

[11] Eckerd, A., & Heidelberg, R. L. (2020). Administering Public Participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019871368

[12] Elizabeth F Drexler. (2022). Impunity and Transitional Justice in Indonesia: Aksi Kamisan’s Circular Time. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 16(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac010

[13] Erisanna, A., & Septia Afsani Akbar, M. (2025). Menalar Demokrasi dalam Masyarakat Sipil: Teori dan Gagasan Baru dalam Pemikiran Gideon Baker. 5(1). https://doi.org/10.37481

[14] Fatimah, S., Wiwoho, J., & Isharyanto, &. (2024). Global Perspectives on Freedom of Expression in Environmental Governance: Legal Implications and Challenges. Jambe Law Journal, 7(2), 481–507. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.7.2.481-507

[15] Felicetti, A. (2021). Learning from democratic practices: New perspectives in institutional design. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1589–1601. https://doi.org/10.1086/711623

[16] Ferraz, C., & Finan, F. (2025). NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MALFUNCTIONING DEMOCRACIES: UNDERSTANDING ACCOUNTABILITY FAILURES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Malfunctioning Democracies: Understanding Accountability Failures in Developing Countries. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34198

[17] Gisinger, E. (2023). Counter-hegemonic appropriations of space: Urban squats as counter-spaces – on the example of an occupation in the Brussels-Capital Region. [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. ReposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2023.102180

[18] GoodStats. (2025). Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia Turun, Jadi Posisi Ke-4 ASEAN. Https://Goodstats.Id/Article/Indeks-Demokrasi-Indonesia-Turun-Jadi-Posisi-Ke-4-Asean-IeyD9.

[19] Green Network. (2024). Menurunnya Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia. Https://Greennetwork.Id/Gna-Knowledge-Hub/Menurunnya-Indeks-Demokrasi-Indonesia/.

[20] Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341

[21] Han, H., Baggetta, M., & Oser, J. (2026). Organizing and Democracy: Understanding the Possibilities for Transformative Collective Action. 21, 53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322

[22] Hendrawan, H. J., Endriana, S., & Anggraeni, T. S. (2022). Peran generasi muda sebagai agen perubahan dalam menyampaikan aspirasi terkait isu car free day di Kota Malang berbasis critical thinking skills. 2(10), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.17977/um063v2i102022p983-998

[23] Hossain, M. N., Rana, S., & Al Amin, M. (2024). Between the People and Power: Populism’s Role in Democratic Backsliding in Emerging Nations. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5147250

[24] Iversen, F. C. (2025). Degree Project in Urban and Regional Planning Second Cycle, 30 Credits Public Space and Contested Democracy: The Case of Tempelhofer Feld A Multi-Method Qualitative Analysis of Participation, Activism, and Lived Democratic Practice. www.kth.se

[25] Jacobsson, K., & Korolczuk, E. (2020). Mobilizing Grassroots in the City: Lessons for Civil Society Research in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 33(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-9320-7

[26] Jimenez-Luque, A. (2021). Decolonial leadership for cultural resistance and social change: Challenging the social order through the struggle of identity. Sage Journals, 17(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020952235

[27] Junaidi, J., & Rodiah, I. (2023). Praktik Sistem Nomokrasi Islam: Potret Kebebasan Ruang Publik Masyarakat Sipil Aceh. Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam, 10(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v10i2.6574

[28] Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Disinformation and the Structural Transformations of the Public Arena: Addressing the Actual Challenges to Democracy. Social Media and Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988928

[29] Kaleem, A. (2022). The hegemony of Prevent: turning counter-terrorism policing into common sense. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 15(2), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2021.2013016

[30] Kaltim Today. (2025). Represifitas di Penggusuran Pasar Subuh, Kepala Satpol PP Samarinda: Pelibatan Aparat Gabungan Bentuk Perlindungan Diri. Https://Kaltimtoday.Co/Represifitas-Di-Penggusuran-Pasar-Subuh-Kepala-Satpol-Pp-Samarinda-Pelibatan-Aparat-Gabungan-Bentuk-Perlindungan-Diri.

[31] Kassa, B. E., & Sarikakis, K. (2022). Shrinking communicative space for media and gender equality civil society organizations. Feminist Media Studies, 22(7), 1745–1762. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1917640

[32] Khan, Md. M. R. (2021). Political state and the dilemma of dignity, equality and freedom: Evidence from a sovereign state. Dynamics of Politics and Democracy, 1(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.35912/dpd.v1i1.697

[33] Khusniah, K. W. (2024). Gerakan Sosial dan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Masa Transisi Demokrasi di Indonesia. 2(1), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10473037

[34] Klik Kaltim. (2019). Ekspresi Perjuangan Keadilan Melalui Aksi Kamisan Kaltim. Https://Klikkaltim.Com/Category/Samarinda/Ekspresi-Perjuangan-Keadilan-Melalui-Aksi-Kamisan-Kaltim.

[35] Koliba, C. (2025). Liberal democratic accountability standards and public administration. Public Administration Review, 85(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13831

[36] Kompas. (2022). Aturan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum. Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/Read/2022/04/21/01300061/Aturan-Menyampaikan-Pendapat-Di-Muka-Umum.

[37] Kristiyono, J. (2020). Perlawanan Hegemoni Budaya dan Mitos pada Karya Seni Rupa Digital Biennale Jatim. Biokultur, 9(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.20473/bk.v9i2.22365

[38] Levenda, A. M., Keough, N., Rock, M., & Miller, B. (2020). Rethinking public participation in the smart city. Canadian Geographer, 64(3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12601

[39] Lutfianto Hapsoro, F., & Rofiqi, M. H. (2024). Analysis of Indicators of Constitutional Decline in Indonesia (A Review of Contemporary Democracy). LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies, 1, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13336975

[40] Masferrer, A. (2023). The Decline of Freedom of Expression and Social Vulnerability in Western democracy. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 36(4), 1443–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09990-1

[41] Mason, M. (2020). Transparency, accountability and empowerment in sustainability governance: a conceptual review. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1661231

[42] Mohammad Ali, & Moh. Abd. Rauf. (2021). Problem Yuridis Penyelesaian Perkara HAM Berat dalam Sistem Pidana Indonesia dan Pidana Islam. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2021.24.2.469-494

[43] Mohammed, W. M., Molamohamadi, Z., Babaee Tirkolaee, E., Mirzazadeh, A., & Weber, GW. (2026). Balancing Security and Civil Liberties: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Constitutional Frameworks and Proportionality in Governance. Optimization and Data Science in Industrial Engineering. ODSIE 2025. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol 2854. Springer, Cham. . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-17020-0_44

[44] Moyo, Z. (2024). A Faltering Counter-Hegemony: Towards a Conclusion. In: Civil Society and the Party-State in Zimbabwe. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore., 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5254-6_7

[45] Mr. Maneesh Thakkar. (2025). Strengthening Governance and Policy Frameworks for Sustainable Development: Addressing Corruption, Transparency, and Regulatory Challenges. American Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society , 1(15). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15422818

[46] Nasution, L. (2020). Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Ruang Publik di Era Digital. ’ADALAH, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i3.16200

[47] Neraca. (2024). Tolak Demo di Tengah Masyarakat Jaga Stabilitas Keamanan Pasca Pemilu. Https://Www.Neraca.Co.Id/Article/195895/Tolak-Demo-Di-Tengah-Masyarakat-Jaga-Stabilitas-Keamanan-Pasca-Pemilu.

[48] Nissen, S. (2021). Political Participation: Inclusion of Citizens in Democratic Opinion-Forming and Decision-Making Processes. Justice and Strong Institutions. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95960-3_42

[49] Nofia Sari, E., Apriani, F., Indarto, K., Samuel Fagbamila, A., & Author, C. (2026). Assessing Local Government Policy Implementation for Improving Educational Quality in Coastal Communities. Journal of Etika Demokrasi, 11(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.26618/7vccfa89

[50] Nofrima, S., & Qodir, Z. (2021). GERAKAN SOSIAL BARU INDONESIA: STUDI GERAKAN GEJAYAN MEMANGGIL 2019. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 16(1), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v16i1.2163

[51] Nomor Satu Kaltim. (2024). Nobar Film Eksil di Samrinda Dibatalkan Sepihak, Aksi Kamisan Kaltim Sebut Pembungkaman Demokrasi. Https://Nomorsatukaltim.Disway.Id/Read/39988/Nobar-Film-Eksil-Di-Samarinda-Dibatalkan-Sepihak-Aksi-Kamisan-Kaltim-Sebut-Pembungkaman-Demokrasi.

[52] Ombudsman. (2019). Menghadapi Aksi Demo Mahasiswa, Ini Pesan Ombudsman Kepada Polisi. Https://Ombudsman.Go.Id/Pengumuman/r/Menghadapi-Aksi-Demo-Mahasiswa-Ini-Pesan-Ombudsman-Kepada-Polisi.

[53] Orias, M. (2025). Transformation of National Law Towards a Just Democratic State. Journal of Law and Humanity Studies. https://doi.org/10.59613/xbfbde43

[54] Osman, S. (2025). Taking consent for granted: A case for rethinking hegemony. Thesis Eleven, 187(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136241308880

[55] Paula Fernandez-Wulff, & Christopher Yap. (2020). The Urban Politics of Human Rights Practice. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(2), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa019

[56] Pinckney, J., Butcher, C., & Braithwaite, J. M. (2022). Organizations, Resistance, and Democracy: How Civil Society Organizations Impact Democratization. International Studies Quarterly, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab094

[57] Putra, L. J. (2016). AKSI KAMISAN: SEBUAH TINJAUAN PRAKTIS DAN TEORITIS ATAS TRANSFORMASI GERAKAN SIMBOLIK. JURNAL POLINTER : KAJIAN POLITIK DAN HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL, 2(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.52447/polinter.v2i1.498

[58] Rendy Adiwilaga. (2018). Aksi Kamisan Sebagai Representasi Civil Society dan Respon Pemerintah Era Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Menyikapi Kasus Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Masa Lampau. Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, Vol 10 No 3, 14–32. https://doi.org/10.52166/madani.v10i3.1262

[59] Rini, M. S. (2022). Kajian Yuridis terhadap Ham: Timbulnya Aksi Kamisan sebagai Representatif Peristiwa 1998-1999. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 7(4), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v7i4.22619

[60] Rizky Shorfana, M. (2025). HEGEMONI GRAMSCI DAN PRAKTIK KEAGAMAAN HABAIB DI INDONESIA THE HEGEMONY OF GRAMSCI AND THE RELIGIOUS PRACTICES OF THE HABAIB IN INDONESIA. Lisyabab Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 6(2), 2722–8096. https://doi.org/10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v6i2.358

[61] Rollo, T. (2021). Democratic silence: two forms of domination in the social contract tradition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24(3), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1796330

[62] Rusfiana, Y., & Kurniasih, D. (2024). Hasan Aydin The Role of Civil Society Organizations in Promoting Social and Political Change in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/48793997

[63] Ruuska, T., Heikkurinen, P., & Wilén, K. (2020). Domination, power, supremacy: Confronting anthropolitics with ecological realism. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072617

[64] Seeck, H., Sturdy, A., Boncori, A. L., & Fougère, M. (2020). Ideology in Management Studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12215

[65] Shokheh, M. (2023). Titik Nadir Demokrasi Pasca Reformasi: Quo Vadis Civil Society. In Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia ISSN Print (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.62924/jsi.v6i1.32599

[66] Sofwan, E., Sopiyana, M., & Fathurrahman, A. M. (2022). The application of the right to freedom of expression in demonstration based on principles of a democratic state. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(2), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i2.53464

[67] Suhardi. (2024). Bentuk-Bentuk Counter-Hegemoni Media Era Internet. Journal Media Public Relations, 4 No. 2 Tahun 2024. https://doi.org/10.37090/jmp.v4i2.1893

[68] Tempo. (2025). Riset EIU: Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia Masuk Kategori Flawed Democracy. Https://Www.Tempo.Co/Politik/Riset-Eiu-Indeks-Demokrasi-Indonesia-Masuk-Kategori-Flawed-Democracy-1215360 .

[69] Toukan, H. (2020). Liberation or emancipation? Counter-hegemony, performance and public space in Lebanon. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(2), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877919847487

[70] Wulandari, A. (2023). SETIATI SURASTO DALAM PERJUANGAN BURUH PEREMPUAN PADA 1940AN-1960AN. Handep: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Budaya, 7(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.33652/handep.v7i1.390

[71] Yulianta. (2025). Catatan Perbaikan Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia. Https://Ilmuhukum.Uin-Suka.Ac.Id/Id/Kolom/Detail/919/Catatan-Perbaikan-Indeks-.

[72] Zahana, Y., Hikmah Purnama, D., Dewi Sartika, D., & Analisa Sosiologi, J. (2024). Gerakan Sosial Kelompok Perempuan Pejuang Seribandung (KPPS) dalam Konflik Tenurial di Ogan Illir. https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v13i2.90816

[73] Zana Ayunda, A., Mahmuda Urbaningkrum, S., Wafiqoh Nusaibah, A., Septiana, W., Salekhah Nur Widyani, S., Rahman, A. H., & Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta, U. (2022). TANTANGAN MULTIKULTURALISME DI INDONESIA: MENYOAL RELASI AGAMA DAN RUANG PUBLIK. In ALSYS : Jurnal Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan (Vol. 2, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v2i1.138

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Public Space as Resistance: Kaltim Kamisan and Indonesia’s Democratic Restrictions. (2026). JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.26618/6fbq0h76

How to Cite

Public Space as Resistance: Kaltim Kamisan and Indonesia’s Democratic Restrictions. (2026). JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.26618/6fbq0h76