Political Sensitive Design: Raising Public Awareness of Political Money

Urai Panzi, Jagad Aditya Dewantara, Sulistyarini Sulistyarini

Abstract


The urgency of this research is how we as the Society 5.0 generation invite the public to be more sensitive to the law and increase public awareness that financial politics should not be enforced because it can lead to violations of the law and legal practices that should not be carried out. The aim of this research is to determine the awareness of people who do not yet know about money politics. This research uses a qualitative descriptive writing method, namely a writing method used to objectively describe, describe and explain the object of writing. Political Sensibility is a forum for development and understanding for people who are not yet aware of regulations that can harm many people, for example money politics which results in the destruction of democracy. From the problems mentioned above, it is necessary to have a forum as a place for development and understanding for people who are not aware of regulations that can harm many people, for example with the existence of money politics which results in damage to democracy. Increasing Public Awareness Regarding Political Money through Political Sensitive Program Designs.

Keywords


Awareness; Money Politics; SDGS 2030; Society; Polical

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD

References


Amalia, L. S., Darmawan, D., Nuryanti, S., Nugroho, A. E., Romli, L., & Kartini, I. (2021). Dinamika Sosial Politik Pemilu Serentak 2019. In Dinamika Sosial Politik Pemilu Serentak 2019. https://doi.org/10.14203/press.332

Aminuddin, M. F., & Attamimi, N. H. (2019). From Retail to Grocery: Money Politics in 2014 Indonesian Legislative Election. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 4(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v4i1.12609

Ansolabehere, S., De Figueiredo, J. M., & Snyder, J. M. (2003). Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164976

Ardianto, R. (2020). Partisipasi Masyarakat Tinggi, Dari 262 Kasus Politik Uang 197 Laporan Masyarakat. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/berita/partisipasi-masyarakat-tinggi-dari-262-kasus-politik-uang-197-laporan-masyarakat

Arif, M. S. (2020). Meningkatkan Angka Partisipasi Sebagai Upaya Menjamin Legitimasi Hasil Pemilihan Kepada Daerah Dan Wakil Kepala Daerah Di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 2(1), 18–40. www.journal.kpu.go.id

Arismaya, A., & Utami, I. (2019). Facts, causes and corruption prevention: Evidence in Indonesian ministries. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 1(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol1.iss2.art3

Annur, S., Wati, M., Mahtari, S., & Prastika, M. D. (2018). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) dan Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan (pp. 251–255).

Bawaslu. (2021). Partisipasi Masyarakat Tinggi, Dari 262 Kasus Politik Uang 197 Laporan Masyarakat https://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/berita/partisipasi-masyarakat-tinggi-dari-262-kasus-politik-uang-197-laporan-masyarakat

Baehaki, K. (2021). Gagalnya Pencegahan Money Politik Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. 39–56.

Besar, G., Tatanegara, H., Indonesia, U., Ketua, W., Gelar, D., Asshiddiqie, L. J., New, T., & American, O. (2020). edition, Oxford University Press, 2005. 1. Pengertian Konstitusi, 2009–2015.

Bologna, J. (2016). Three Essays on the Economics of Corruption. http://www.ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/20721/3/Arif_Faisal_2012_Thesis.pdf

BPUPKI. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945. 105(3), 129–133. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BDsuQOHoCi4J:https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/9138-ID-perlindungan-hukum-terhadap-anak-dari-konten-berbahaya-dalam-media-cetak-dan-ele.pdf+&cd=3&hl=id&ct=clnk&gl=id

‘Cassandra’ Tai, Y., Hu, Y., & Solt, F. (2022). Democracy, Public Support, and Measurement Uncertainty. American Political Science Review, 72004109, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422000429

Commission, E., Democracy, F. O. R., Law, T., Office, O., & Democratic, F. O. R. (2020). Guidelines On Political Party Regulation Approved by the Council of Democratic Elections at its 69th online meeting ( 7 October 2020 ) and Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 125th online Plenary Session ( 11-12 December 2020 ) on the basis of comment. 881.

Direktorat Jenderal Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil (Dukcapil). (2021).

Dr. Umar Sidiq, M.Ag Dr. Moh. Miftachul Choiri, M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). http://repository.iainponorogo.ac.id/484/1/Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Di Bidang Pendidikan.pdf

Eprs, T., & Parliamentary, E. (2019). Polarisation and the use of techonology in political campaigns (Issue March).

Faadil, M. I., Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2018). Society 5 . 0 and Social Development Society 5 .0 and Social Development. November. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints2018

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075

Fisman, R., & Miguel, E. (2007). Corruption, norms, and legal enforcement: evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. Journal of Political Economy, 115(6), 1020–1048. https://doi.org/10.1086/527495

Indrayana, D. (2017). Money Politics in a More Democratic Indonesia : An Overview. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 18(2), 1–15.

Jama, S. R. (2021). The Essence of Civil Society in Democracy. JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi), 6(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.26618/jed.v6i1.4369

Jamil, K., Dunnan, L., Gul, R. F., Shehzad, M. U., Gillani, S. H. M., & Awan, F. H. (2022). Role of Social Media Marketing Activities in Influencing Customer Intentions: A Perspective of a New Emerging Era. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(January), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.808525

Kalla, J. L., & Broockman, D. E. (2018). The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000363

Lezine, D. Q. A., & Reed, G. A. (2007). Political will: A bridge between public health knowledge and action. American Journal of Public Health, 97(11), 2010–2013. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.113282

Macnamara, J. (2018). 11. Content Analysis. Mediated Communication, September 2018, 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110481129-012

Mas’oed, M., & Savirani, A. (2017). Financing Politics in Indonesia. PCD Journal, 3(1–2), 63. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.25741

Mila Sari, A. (2020). Library Research of the Basic Theory. Natural Science [Diakses 11 Juli 2022], 6(1), 41–53.

Mujani, S., Liddle, R. W., & Ambardi, K. (2018). Voting behavior in Indonesia since democratization: Critical democrats. Voting Behavior in Indonesia since Democratization: Critical Democrats, 6(1), 1–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108377836

Mukrimaa, S. S., Nurdyansyah, Fahyuni, E. F., YULIA CITRA, A., Schulz, N. D., غسان, د., Taniredja, T., Faridli, E. M., & Harmianto, S. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian dalam Psikologi Politik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(August), 128.

Norris. (2012). He is a PhD student in Political Science at the Postgraduate Program at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). 1(1), 155–163.

Nur M. Kasim. (2023). Peran Politik Hukum Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Wijayakusuma Law Review, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.51921/wlr.v5i1.229

Panzi, U., Dewantara, J. A., & Heru, W. (2023). Beyond the Presidential Threshold : How Cebong and Kampret Political Identities Shape Social Media Discourse. 5(2), 163–194.

Potters, J., & Sloof, R. (1996). Interest groups: A survey of empirical models that try to assess their influence. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(3), 403–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(96)00008-0

Riskiyono, J. (2015). Public Participation in the Formation of Legislation to Achieve Prosperity. Aspirasi, 6(2), 159–176.

Robert, B., & Brown, E. B. (2020). Educational Innovation in Society 5.0 Era: Challenges and Opportunities (Issue 1).

Romli, L. (2019). Political Identity and Challenges for Democracy Consolidation in Indonesia. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 4(1), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v4i1.17214

Rusandi, & Muhammad Rusli. (2021). Merancang Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar/Deskriptif dan Studi Kasus. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 2(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.55623/au.v2i1.18

Saleh, S. (2017). Penerbit Pustaka Ramadhan, Bandung. Analisis Data Kualitatif, 180. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228075212.pdf

Sari, M. M. K., Huda, M., & Warsono, W. (2023). University student voters’ resistance to money politics. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 9(1), 31–40.

Satriawan, I., & B, F. S. R. (2022). Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Innovation on Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences (ICOSI-HESS 2022). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Innovation on Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences (ICOSI-HESS 2022). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-65-7

Schneider, C. R., Zaval, L., Weber, E. U., & Markowitz, E. M. (2017). The influence of anticipated pride and guilt on pro-environmental decision making. PLoS ONE, 12(11), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188781

Siregar, M. C., & Maryanah, T. (2022). Fenomena Money Politics Dan Pembuktian Terstruktur Sistematis Masif (Tsm) Pada Pemilihan Walikota Dan Wakil Walikota Bandar Lampung 2020. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja, 48(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.33701/jipwp.v48i2.1461

Sugiono, S. (2020). Industri Konten Digital dalam Perspektif Society 5.0. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Komunikasi, 22(2), 175–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.33164/iptekkom.22.2.2020.175-191

Supriyanto, D., & Wulandari, L. (2013). Transparansi dan Akuntabillitas Pengelolaan Dana Kampanye. Jurnal Pemilu Dan Demokrasi, Vol.5, 85–129.

S. Chandrasekhar, F. R. S., & Laily Noor Ikhsanto, jurusan teknik mesin. (2020). Pengaruh Money Politic Dalam Pemilihan Anggota Legislatif Terhadap Keberlangsungan Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Liquid Crystals, 21(1), 1–17.

Tomaž, D. (2023). Young people’s participation in European democratic processes - How to improve and facilitate youth involvement.

Ulum, M. B. (2020). Indonesian Democracy and Political Parties After Twenty Years of Reformation: a Contextual Analysis. Indonesia Law Review, 10(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v10n1.577

Wahyuningsih, W. (2018). Millenium Develompent Goals (Mdgs) Dan Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs) Dalam Kesejahteraan Sosial. Bisma, 11(3), 390. https://doi.org/10.19184/bisma.v11i3.6479

Waldenberger, F. (2018). The Digital Future - Society 5.0 - Japanese Ambitions and Initiatives. 48–55.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/jed.v8i4.11833

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.