Managerial Ownership and Audit Committee Effects on Integrated Reporting Quality: Moderating Role of Board Gender Diversity

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/bsp43k06

Authors

  • Dewi Wahyuni Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Nadirsyah Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Nuraini A Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Syah Kuala, Indonesia

Managerial Ownership, Audit Committee, Gender of the Board of Directors, Quality Integrated Reporting, Corporate Governance

Abstract

This study examines the influence of managerial ownership and audit committee effectiveness on the quality of integrated reporting (IRQ), with the gender of the board of directors as a moderating variable, in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2019–2024 period. Despite the increasing global adoption of integrated reporting, empirical evidence on its governance determinants in emerging markets remains limited and fragmented. This study integrates institutional, legitimacy, and stakeholder theories to provide a comprehensive explanation of governance-driven reporting behavior. Using a quantitative associative approach, this study analyzes 149 firm-year observations from 61 companies selected through purposive sampling. Panel data regression analysis with a Random Effect Model (REM) is employed to test the hypotheses. The results indicate that managerial ownership and audit committees have a positive and statistically significant effect on the quality of integrated reporting, supporting the arguments of agency alignment and effective monitoring mechanisms. However, the gender of the board of directors does not significantly moderate the relationship between governance mechanisms and reporting quality, suggesting contextual and structural limitations in the role of gender diversity within emerging markets. This study contributes to the literature by integrating multiple governance mechanisms within a multi-theoretical framework and providing empirical evidence from Indonesia. Practically, the findings highlight the importance of strengthening corporate governance structures to enhance transparency, accountability, and the overall quality of integrated reporting, offering implications for regulators, policymakers, and standard-setting bodies.

References

ational Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(10), 2868–2887.

Kivits, R., Sawang, S., Kivits, R., & Sawang, S. (2021). Stakeholder theory. The Dynamism of Stakeholder Engagement: A Case Study of the Aviation Industry, 1–8.

Lim, A., & Pope, S. (2022). What drives companies to do good? A “universal” ordering of corporate social responsibility motivations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2199

Qaderi, S. A., Ali Ghaleb, B., Qasem, A., & Waked, S. S. S. (2023). Audit committee effectiveness and integrated reporting quality: Does family ownership matter? Cogent Economics and Finance, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2291893

Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2021). Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2635

Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Mariani, M., & Vitolla, F. (2022). Integrated reporting quality and cost of debt financing. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 122–138.

Risnawati, H., & Jaelani, A. (2025). Corporate Governance and Integrated Reporting: An Empirical Analysis of Mining Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, 16(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.36982/jiegmk.v16i1.5355

Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144

Ulum, I. L. Y., Rizki, S., Anataya, A. S., Surur, M. M., & Aji, G. (2024). Paradigma Akuntansi Terintegrasi: Menggabungkan Pelaporan Keuangan dan Non-Keuangan untuk Pengambilan Keputusan yang Lebih Baik. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 1(2), 327–336.

Zennaro, G., Corazza, G., & Zanin, F. (2024). The effects of integrated reporting quality: a meta-analytic review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(7), 197–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2023-2175

Zouari, G., & Dhifi, K. (2021). The impact of board characteristics on integrated reporting: case of European companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(1), 83–94.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles