COMPREHENSIVE APPLIED RESEARCH ON INFLECTIONAL AND DERIVATIONAL MORPHEMES IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/r2je0q05
Derivation, Inflection, Language Acquisition, Morphological Awareness, Teaching Morphology
Abstrak
Language acquisition, in particular for English as a second language (ESL), involves the knowledge of essential linguistic components such as morphemes. This research, entitled "Comprehensive Applied Research on Inflectional and Derivational Morphemes in English Language Acquisition," examines the acquisition and application of inflectional and derivational morphemes by English Language Learners (ELLs). Inflectional morphemes modify tense, number, or aspect without changing the word class, but derivational morphemes change the meaning and grammatical category of words, therefore facilitating vocabulary development. This study examines morpheme learning patterns, the difficulties learners experience due to the complexity of English morphology and the impacts of their first languages (L1s), as well as the influence of morphemes on overall language ability. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating corpus analysis, experimental activities, and longitudinal tracking of English Language Learners across several educational environments. Interviews and classroom observations provide qualitative insights into cognitive processes and pedagogical practices. The findings indicate that inflectional morphemes are acquired earlier, with learners exhibiting consistent mistake patterns, whereas derivational morphemes provide higher difficulties and are acquired subsequently. Cross-linguistic interference from first languages dramatically impacts learning, and explicit instruction in morphemes greatly enhances learners' proficiency. The research highlights the significance of morpheme awareness in achieving advanced language competency and provides pragmatic ideas for improving the development of morphology-based instructional materials, explicit teaching strategies for ESL/EFL classrooms, and curriculum recommendations that integrate systematic morphological awareness training into English language learning. These findings emphasize the importance of morphology-focused instruction in supporting learners’ linguistic competence and long-term language development.
Referensi
Awad-Igbaria, Y., Maaravi-Hesseg, R., Admon, R., & Karni, A. (2022). Only tomorrow: Delayed effects of teachers attitude on motor skill learning. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101681
Collie, R. J. (2022). Perceived social-emotional competence: A multidimensional examination and links with social-emotional motivation and behaviors. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101656
Gallo, A., Olivier, E., Archambault, I., & Morin, A. J. S. (2022). Student-teacher relationship and classroom goal structure profiles: Promoting achievement and preventing externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101684
Große, C. S. (2022). Multiple solutions in dyads or alone – Fostering the acquisition of modeling competencies in mathematics. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101683
Haataja, E. S. H., Chan, M. C. E., Salonen, V., & Clarke, D. J. (2022). Can noncomplementarity of agency lead to successful problem solving? A case study on students’ interpersonal behaviors in mathematical problem-solving collaboration. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101657
Herbert, B., Fischer, J., & Klieme, E. (2022). How valid are student perceptions of teaching quality across education systems? Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101652
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Schneider, J. W., & Sainte-Marie, M. (2022). Ungendered writing: Writing styles are unlikely to account for gender differences in funding rates in the natural and technical sciences. Journal of Informetrics, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101332
Järvinen, J., Ketonen, E. E., Hietajärvi, L., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). From high peaks to deep valleys: Using a situation- and person-oriented approach to assess within- and between-student variation in momentary engagement and disengagement. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101685
Jossberger, H., Breckwoldt, J., & Gruber, H. (2022). Promoting Expertise Through Simulation (PETS): A conceptual framework. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101686
Kedrick, K., Levitskaya, E., & Funk, R. J. (2025). Investigating writing style as a contributor to gender gaps in science and technology. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.13805
Laurent, M., Crisci, R., Bressoux, P., Chaachoua, H., Nurra, C., de Vries, E., & Tchounikine, P. (2022). Impact of programming on primary mathematics learning. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101667
Lepper, C., Stang-Rabrig, J., & McElvany, N. (2022). Gender differences in reading: Examining text-based interest in relation to text characteristics and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101680
Ma, Y., Teng, Y., Deng, Z., Liu, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Does writing style affect gender differences in the research performance of articles?: An empirical study of BERT-based textual sentiment analysis. Scientometrics, 128(4), 2105–2143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04666-w
Martin, A. J., Burns, E. C., Collie, R. J., Cutmore, M., MacLeod, S., & Donlevy, V. (2022). The role of engagement in immigrant students’ academic resilience. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101650
Mok, S. Y., Hämmerle, C. S., Rüede, C., & Staub, F. C. (2022). How do professional development programs on comparing solution methods and classroom discourse affect students’ achievement in mathematics? The mediating role of students’ subject matter justifications. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101668
Narciss, S., Prescher, C., Khalifah, L., & Körndle, H. (2022). Providing external feedback and prompting the generation of internal feedback fosters achievement, strategies and motivation in concept learning. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101658
Pohle, L., Hosoya, G., Pohle, J., & Jenßen, L. (2022). The relationship between early childhood teachers’ instructional quality and children’s mathematics development. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101636
Rahman, M. A. (2024b). Gender Bias in Academic Writing: Challenges and Equity Strategies. Muadalah, 12(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.18592/muadalah.v12i1.12543
Rianto, A. (2021). Examining gender differences in reading strategies, reading skills, and English proficiency of EFL University students. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1993531
Rosenzweig, E. Q., Song, Y., & Clark, S. (2022). Mixed effects of a randomized trial replication study testing a cost-focused motivational intervention. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101660
Smith, E., & Reimer, D. (2024). Understanding gender inequality in children’s reading behavior: New insights from digital behavioral data. Child Development, 95(2), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14001
Tetzlaff, L., Hartmann, U., Dumont, H., & Brod, G. (2022). Assessing individualized instruction in the classroom: Comparing teacher, student, and observer perspectives. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101655
Tiffin-Richards, S. P., Lenhart, J., & Marx, P. (2022). When do examinees change their initial answers? The influence of task instruction, response confidence, and subjective task difficulty. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101654
Trninic, D., Sinha, T., & Kapur, M. (2022). Comparing the effectiveness of preparatory activities that help undergraduate students learn from instruction. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101688
Van Vemde, L., Donker, M. H., & Mainhard, T. (2022). Teachers, loosen up! How teachers can trigger interpersonally cooperative behavior in students at risk of academic failure. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101687
Virtanen, T., Vasalampi, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., Pelkonen, J., & Poikkeus, A. M. (2022). Stability of social support during school transitions: Associations with truancy and not completing upper secondary education in normative time. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101663
Xie, Q., & Yeung, S. S. sze. (2022). Do vocabulary, syntactic awareness, and reading comprehension in second language facilitate the development of each other in young children? Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101682
Xue, S., Wang, C., & Yang, Y. (2022). Exploring affecting factors of and developing a framework for teachers’ online instruction. Learning and Instruction, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101665
Zaniar, S., Authar, N., Aquariza, N. R., Rihlah, J., & Sucita, A. A. P. (2024). Comprehensive Analysis of Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes for English Language Acquisition. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(8), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v5i8.3268
Zaniar, S., Authar, N. ., Aquariza, N. R. ., Rihlah, J. ., & Pramudita, N. A. . (2024). Implementation of Teaching Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes to SMP Al Islah Surabaya. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 5(09), 2331–2337. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i09.1406
Zaniar, S., Afandi, M.D., Djuwari, Authar, N., & Pramudita, N. A. Morphological and Syntactical Errors of Junior High School Students with Different Sex in Speech Production. (2024). Exposure : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 13(2), 636-647. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v13i2.14783
Zaniar, S., Pramudita, N. A., Majidha, A., Laiyinah, W. N., & Riskiani, A. (2025, August). Phonological Errors in Sex and Gender-Based Analysis of Speaking Style of Junior High School Students'. In Proceeding of International Conference on Digital, Social, and Science (Vol. 2, No. 01, pp. 938-948). https://journal.ebizmark.id/index.php/ICoDSS/article/view/176/288
Zaniar, S., Djuwari, D., Didien Afandi, M. ., Rihlah, J. ., & Susanto, F. A. . . (2025). Applied Research on Community Empowerment of Teaching Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes to Pondok An Nahdloh, Selangor, Malaysia. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 6(12), 3694–3604. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i12.2122
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 2026
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
