AN EVALUATION ON TOEFL WORKSHOP PROGRAM USING STAKE'S COUNTENANCE MODEL

Yupika Maryansyah, Syukri Hamzah, Hadiwinarto Hadiwinarto

Abstract


The Test of English as Foreign Language (TOEFL) is getting more and more important every day for both further study and career advancement. Accordingly, many educational institutions, both state-owned and private in Indonesia carry out innovative programs to increase their graduates' TOEFL scores. Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu (UMB), as an educational institution is also carry out a program aiming to improve its graduates’ TOEFL score. The program is called as the TOEFL workshop for UMB students. This study is an evaluative study analyzing a program administered by UMB, TOEFL workshop for UMB students. The researchers used Stake Countenance Model as a method in the current study. The results of the study show that there is a contingency between antecedent, transaction, and outcome of the program of TOEFL workshop for UMB students.

Keywords


TOEFL Workshop Program; Evaluation; Stake Countenance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adib, H. S., Mardapi, D., Zamroni, Z., & Jait, A. (2019). Evaluation of Islam education teachers training implementation. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 106– 116. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.20986

Alemi, M., & Pazooki, S. J. (2020). A stakeholder-based evaluation of engineering ESP courses’ effectiveness. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-58769/v1

Iftanti, E & Maunah, B. (2021). Belief, Perception, and Challenges of Non English Department Students to Learn English in Globalization Era. Indonesian EFL Journal. 7(1), 1–12.

https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IEFLJ/article/download/3985/2452

Choudhury, G. B., & Sharma, V. (2019). Review and comparison of various training effectiveness evaluation models for R & D organization performance. PM World Journal, 8(2), 1–13.

Esfandiari, M. R., Riasati, M. J., Vaezian, H., & Rahimi, F. (2018). A quantitative analysis of TOEFL iBT using an interpretive model of test validity. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1-13.

Esfandiari, M. R., Riasati, M. J., Vaezian, H., & Rahimi, F. (2018). A quantitative analysis of TOEFL iBT using an interpretive model of test validity. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1-13

Hamm, R.W. (1985). A Systematic evaluation of an environmental invertigation course. (Doctoral dissertation.Georgia State University). ERIC Document. Reproduction Service No ED-256-622

Ismail, I., & Othman, R. (2020). A review of literature on the English language entry requirement for international students into postgraduate programs in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 543–549. http://www.jcreview.com/?mno=117854

Kaufman, R., & Thomas, S. (1980). Evaluation without fear. New York London: New Viewpoints

Wang, Y. (2019). The impact on Instructors’ Course Conrtent and Teaching Methods. The Electonic Journal for English as a Second Language. 23(3), 1–18.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1234792.pdf

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan (Revised ed). Parama Publishing.

Nazri, M. A., Wijaya, H., & Zainurrahman, Z. (2020). EFL students’ ability in answering TOEFL reading comprehension section. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539, 012044.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012044

Phillip, D. (2006). Longman Introductory Course for the TOEFL Test: The Paper Test. London: Pearson Education, Inc.

Provus, M., Malcolm. (1969). The discrepancy evaluation models. An approach to local program improvement and development. Pitaburgh Public School.

Sakurai, N. (2020). Exploring a placement test for extensive reading programs. Humanities Series, 2(3), 53–70. https://ksu.repo.nii.ac.jp/ action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=10 468&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1

Stake, R E. (1967). Forward technology for the evaluation of educational programs. In R W Tyler, R M Gagne, & M Scriven. (Eds). Perpectives of curriculum evaluation. (pp.1-12). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Stake, R E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teacher’s Coolege Record. Vol. 68, no:7.

Stake, R E. (1977).The Countenance of educational evaluation.In A.A. Bellack & H.M Kliebard. Eds 1. Curriculum and evaluation (pp. 372-390).Berkeley.CA McCutehan.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1973). Educational evaluation: theory and practice. In B.R. Worthen & J.R. Sanders (Eds), Evaluation as Enligbtenment for Decision Marking (pp.3-5). Boston: KluwerNijhoff Publishing.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A.J. (1984). Systematic evaluation a selfinstructional guide to theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Wood, B.B. (2001). Stake’s Countenance Model: Evaluating an Enveronmental Education Proffesional Development Course. The Journal of Environmental Education, Vol.32, No.2, pp. 18-27

Yogawati, N. D., & Widihastuti, W. (2019). Evaluating the implementation of English communication therapy (ECT): An objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA) approach. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i1.22449




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v12i1.9723

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

© All rights reserved 2023. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris (ISSN Print: 2252-7818), (ISSN Online: 2502-3543)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.