RHETORICAL FACTORS IN SPEECH COMPOSITION ON NOVICE GRAND FINAL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY DEBATE CHAMPIONSHIP (NUDC) 2020 – 2021

Authors

  • Sherly Alfiani Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
  • Ririn Putri Ananda Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
  • Yupika Maryansyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
  • Washlurachim Safitri Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v11i2.8644

Keywords:

Rhetorical Factors, Speech, Debate, NUDC

Abstract

Rhetorical factors in speech composition is an essential element, it is make speech organized and effective. However the most difficult part of speech in debate match is the speeches delivered by each other debater can be accepted logically and clearly both from the july and audience. The objectives of this research to find out the rhetorical factors in speech composition in building speech of debaters on novice grand final NUDC and for the subject of this research are deabters from novice grand final NUDC 2020 – 2021. Rhetorical factors in speech composition consists of 4 components, such as : coherence, unity, emphasis, ethical and inclusive of language. The result show that the debaters on novice grand final NUDC 2020 – 2021 used all component of rhetorical factors in speech, they delivered at the debate match. This implies that the rhetorical factor in speech composition is very important in speech to build strong and believable arguments, especially in developing the style of language in speech itself, it is suggested that in order to be able to make a good rhetorical in speech, so speech can be more organized and effective.

 

Author Biography

  • Sherly Alfiani, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
    English Edacation Department

References

Ananda, R. P., Arsyad, S., & Dharmayana, I. W. (2018). Argumentative features of international english language testing system (Ielts) essays: A rhetorical analysis on successful exam essays. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4768

Chetty, N., & Alathur, S. (2018). Hate speech review in the context of online social networks. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40(April), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.003

Ikawati, Y. (2018). The Realization of Spoken Text Features in a Debate of Indonesian Students of World Schools Debating Championship 2017. 8(3), 342–349.

Noermanzah, Wahyuni Selbi, Astuti Tri, Wardhana Dian Eka Chandra, & Syafryadin. (2020). The Rhetorical Structure of the Lubuklinggau Mayor’s Speech in Building Community Trust. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT, 19(2), 146–154. http://ijpsat.ijsht-journals.org

Nurcahyo, R., Aruan, D. angelina, & Aryana, I. N. rajin. (2021). BUKU PEDOMAN National University Debating Competition (NUDC) (F. Fitriana & L. Amalia dewi, Eds.; 1st ed.). Pusat Prestasi Nasional Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Samsu. (2017). Metode penelitian: teori dan aplikasi penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, mixed methods, serta research & development. In Rusmini (Ed.), Diterbitkan oleh: Pusat Studi Agama dan Kemasyarakatan (PUSAKA) (1st ed.).

Sidiq, U., & Choiri, Moh. M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. In M. A. dr.anwar Mujahidin (Ed.), Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (1st ed., Vol. 53, Issue 9). CV.Nata Karya.

Steinberg, D., & Freeley, A. J. (2009). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. In Cengage Learning.

Widiatmika, P. W., Budiarsa, I. M., & Sadia, I. G. (2020). Rhetorical Schemes in Barack Obama’s Winning Speech. Humanis, 24(4), 394-401.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles