EMPLOYING TALKING STICK TECHNIQUE TO DEVELOP SPEAKING ABILITY OF EFL LEARNERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v14i1.15447Keywords:
Talking Stick Technique, Speaking Ability, DevelopAbstract
This study set out to find out if grade 8 students at SMP Negeri 19 Palu could talk more fluently after using the Talking Stick Technique. This is a quantitative research study that evaluates the growth of students' speaking abilities using a quasi-experimental design with a pre-and post-test. The Talking Stick Technique significantly improved the students' speaking abilities, according to the results. The gathered data was statistically analyzed to identify any noteworthy variations between the experimental and control groups. According to the results, the experimental group's mean post-test score (60.26) was greater than that of the control group (47.70). Furthermore, the analysis of hypotheses showed that the T-test > Table (2.262 > 1.676). This demonstrates that the study's hypothesis was verified. In conclusion, eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 19 Palu can improve their ability to speak by using the Talking Stick technique.
References
Ananda, E. (2017). Improving Students Speaking Performance By Using Talking Stick Method. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 6(8).
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik, Ed Revisi VI. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Damayanti, I. L., Febrianti Y., Nurlaelawati I., Rahmadani R., Hutasuhut M. L, Devianty G. A. (2022). Buku Panduan Guru English for Nusantara SMP/MTs Kelas VIII.: Jakarta Selatan: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Heaton, J.B. (1988). Writing English Language Text. New York: Longman Inc.
Huda, M. (2015). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Isu-isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2015). Ragam pengembangan model pembelajaran untuk peningkatan profesionalitas guru. Jakarta: Kata Pena, 73, 87-88.
Marisa, R. (2022). The Application Of Talking Stick Method In Improving Students’ Speaking Ability (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry).
Matondang, M. K. D., & Nababan, N. (2022). Improving Students' Speaking Ability By Using Talking Stick Method In The Eight Grade Of SMP Swasta GKPS 3 Pematangsiantar. Bilingual : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 4(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.36985/jbl.v4i1.378
Shoimin, Aris. 2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta:Ar-Ruzz Media.
Tarigan, H. G. (2019). Berbicara; sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Bandung:angkasa
Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. Longman.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
