EVALUATING THE INTEGRATION OF ABCD BEHAVIORAL OBJECTIVES AND BLOOMS'S LEARNING DOMAINS IN THE MERDEKA CURRICULUM LESSON PREPARATION: INSIGHTS AND CHALLENGES

Siti Rabiah Adawiyah, Mila Kamilasari, Dedi Sulaeman

Abstract


Merdeka Curriculum has changed how teachers prepare the lessons. Leading to the necessary understanding of critical aspects of the teaching module making. This study characterizes the learning objectives of the Merdeka curriculum teaching module using Schwiers' ABCD behavioral objectives and Bloom's learning domains theory. It also explores the factors that hinder teachers from fully comprehending the three learning domains (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor) when designing a teaching module. This study utilized a qualitative approach with two junior high school teachers as participants. Analyzing the teaching modules and interviewing participants were performed. Using Schwiers' ABCD and Bloom's learning domains model, this study found that teachers had already focused on learner-centered activities. However, some inconsistencies arose in the presence of 'ABCD' components and three learning objectives statements. Factors like demotivation, lack of prior knowledge, insufficient practice and feedback, understanding gaps, time constraints, and overcrowded curriculum hindered teachers from applying the learning domains. In conclusion, integrating ABCD components and learning domains in a teaching module may facilitate effective instructional design, promote learner-centered approaches, set clear expectations, and optimize the learning environment.Merdeka Curriculum has changed how teachers prepare the lessons. Leading to the necessary understanding of critical aspects of the teaching module making. This study characterizes the learning objectives of the Merdeka curriculum teaching module using Schwiers' ABCD behavioral objectives and Bloom's learning domains theory. It also explores the factors that hinder teachers from fully comprehending the three learning domains (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor) when designing a teaching module. This study utilized a qualitative approach with two junior high school teachers as participants. Analyzing the teaching modules and interviewing participants were performed. Using Schwiers' ABCD and Bloom's learning domains model, this study found that teachers had already focused on learner-centered activities. However, some inconsistencies arose in the presence of 'ABCD' components and three learning objectives statements. Factors like demotivation, lack of prior knowledge, insufficient practice and feedback, understanding gaps, time constraints, and overcrowded curriculum hindered teachers from applying the learning domains. In conclusion, integrating ABCD components and learning domains in a teaching module may facilitate effective instructional design, promote learner-centered approaches, set clear expectations, and optimize the learning environment.

Keywords


Behavioral Objectives; Bloom Taxonomy; English; Merdeka Curriculum; Teaching Module

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aithal, P. S., Shailashree, V., & Kumar, P. M. (2016). ABCD analysis of Stage Model in Higher Education. International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 6(1), 11-24.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. London: Longmans, Green.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Donovan, M. S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2004). How People Learn. Washington, DC: National academy press.

Brock, B. L., & Grady, M. L. (2014). The School Principals' Guide to Successful Daily Practices: Practical Ideas and Strategies for Beginning and Seasoned Educators. Simon and Schuster.

Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L., ... & Zeichner, K. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. John Wiley & Sons.

Dettmer, P. (2005). New blooms in established fields: Four domains of learning and doing. Roeper Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554341

DuFour, R., & Reeves, D. (2016). The futility of PLC lite. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(6), 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716636878

ElSayary, A. (2021). Transdisciplinary STEAM Curriculum Design and Authentic Assessment in Online Learning: A Model of Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Affective Domains. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 493-511.

Fadoli, J. (2022). Exploring Lesson Plans Through Learning Objectives Written by English Teachers. Journal Of Education and Teaching Learning (JETL), 4(3), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.51178/jetl.v4i3.917

Fatimah, S., & Rizaldi, D. (2022). The simplification of the 2013 curriculum in Indonesia during the pandemic. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15(1), 260–271.

Fatmawati, I. (2021). The Merdeka Curriculum: A step towards education recovery post-pandemic. Education Journal Indonesia, 7(3), 185–198

Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers college record, 103(6), 1013-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141

Guskey, T. R. (2009). Closing the knowledge gap on effective professional development. Educational horizons, 87(4), 224-233.

Guskey, T. R. (2022). Implementing mastery learning. Corwin Press.

Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development?. Phi delta kappan, 90(7), 495-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000709

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hoque, M. E. (2016). Three domains of learning: Cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The Journal of EFL Education and Research, 2(2), 45-52.

Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational psychology interactive, 22, 1-4.

Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2015). Conservation education and outreach techniques. Oxford University Press.

Kelleghan, T., Madaus, G. F., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). The effects of standardized testing (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.

Klusmann, U., Richter, D., & Lüdtke, O. (2016). Teachers’ emotional exhaustion is negatively related to students’ achievement: Evidence from a large-scale assessment study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1193. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000125

Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary educational psychology, 36(4), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001

Laia, S. A. (2019). The analysis of English teachers’ lesson plans through objectives theory. ICEAP 2019, 64-68.

Latifa, I. S. (2016). The analysis of teachers' lesson plan through behavioural objectives theory. In Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.2

McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain. New York, NY: Springer.

McConnell, C., Conrad, B., & Uhrmacher, P. B. (2020). Lesson planning with purpose: Five approaches to curriculum design. Teachers College Press.

Mulawarman, W. G. (2021). Overcoming Obstacles in Implementing 2013 Curriculum Policy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 967-980. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1308979

O'Connell, M. (2018). The power of cognitive ability in explaining educational test performance, relative to other ostensible contenders. Intelligence, 66, 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.011

Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative research. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publication Inc.

Romiszowski, A. (2013). The development of physical skills: Instruction in the psychomotor domain. In Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 457-481). Routledge.

Sari, P. P., Luardini, M. A., & Asi, N. (2020). An Analysis of Learning Objective in English Teacher Lesson Plans Based on Abcd Aspect. Journal Compound, 8(3), 21-43.

Schwier, R. A., & Misanchuk, E. R. (1993). Interactive multimedia instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Schwier, R. A. (1998). Schwiercourses, EDCMM 802. Unpublished manuscript, University of Saskatchewan at Saskatoon, Canada.

Siregar, L. F., Sumanik, N. B., & Christianto, H. (2022). Analysis of Teacher’s Ability in Setting Learning Objectives, Flow of Learning Objectives, And Modules in The Merdeka Curriculum. SHS Web of Conference. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214901005

Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son

Susanti, R., & Mahaputri, D. S. (2022). Bloom Taxonomy Used by Teacher in Lesson Plan. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 7(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v7i2.637

Syahidah, R. S., Hizriani, N., & Nor, H. (2022). Enhancing Language Awareness of Student Teachers through Lesson Plan Creation. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 12(2), 352-373. https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v12i2.10010

Wilson, B. J., Petaja, H., & Mancil, L. (2011). The attention skills and academic performance of aggressive/rejected and low aggressive/popular children. Early Education & Development, 22(6), 907-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.505258

Zidan, M. R., & Qamariah, Z. (2023). A Literature study on the implementation of merdeka curriculum. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa, 2(2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurribah.v2i2.1576

Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (2014). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Routledge.

Zerwas, S. (2008). Looking at the first year objectively. Annu. Conf. First Year Assess.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v13i2.15222

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

© All rights reserved 2023. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris (ISSN Print: 2252-7818), (ISSN Online: 2502-3543)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.