CATALYSTS OF NEGOTIATION INITIATION IN EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: AN EXPLORATION OF GENDER DYNAMICS
Abstract
The objective of the study are to investigate the negotiation style uses by Man and Women and the gender influence on the initiation of negotiation in educational conversation context. The research design used in this study is a qualitative descriptive research design. The researchers used the purposive sampling technique to select participants. Participant of this research were an 11 male students and 11 female students of English students of UKI Toraja. The instrument used are observation and interview. This study used the interactive model to analyze data. Data analysis techniques are carried out interactively and take place continuously until complete until the data is saturated. This study confirms that: 1) both male and female participants exhibit a prevalent utilization of the 'compete' negotiation style when initiating conversations within diverse social contexts. Specifically, this negotiation style encompasses proactive engagement in discussions for the explicit purpose of seeking information pertinent to the context. Notably, a higher proclivity for information-seeking through competing behavior is observed among female participants, while male participants tend to engage in conversations without introducing novel topics, emphasizing the nature of their engagement as oriented toward interaction rather than information acquisition. 2) The Influence of Gender Initiation within the Educational Conversation Context, Particularly in the Realms of Attaining Research Information: A Scholarly Exploration and Fostering Collaborative Engagement for Assignment Completion among Peers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aharoni, S. B. (2017). Who needs the women and peace hypothesis? Rethinking modes of inquiry on gender and conflict in Israel/Palestine. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 19(3), 311-326.
Azul, D., Hancock, A. B., Lundberg, T., Nygren, U., & Dhejne, C. (2022). Supporting well-being in gender-diverse people: a tutorial for implementing conceptual and practical shifts toward culturally responsive, person-centered care in speech-language pathology.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(4), 1574-1587.
Babcock, L., Gelfand, M., Small, D., & Stayn, H. (2013). Gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations. In Social psychology and economics (pp. 239-259). Psychology Press.
Birmingham, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. Routledge.
Chodorow, N. (2018). Family structure and feminine personality. In Feminism and philosophy (pp. 199-216). Routledge.
Cresswell, L., Hinch, R., & Cage, E. (2019). The experiences of peer relationships amongst autistic adolescents: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 61, 45-60.
Crossley, L., Woodworth, M., Black, P. J., & Hare, R. (2016). The dark side of negotiation: Examining the outcomes of face-to-face and computer-mediated negotiations among dark personalities. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 47-51.
Deb, A. K., Haque, C. E., & Thompson, S. (2015). ‘Man can’t give birth, woman can't fish’: gender dynamics in the small-scale fisheries of Bangladesh. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(3), 305-324.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Glenn, E. N. (2016). Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. Mothering, 1-29.
Griffin, R. W., & Phillips, J. (2023). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. CENGAGE learning.
Kugler, K. G., Reif, J. A., Kaschner, T., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2018).
Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 144(2), 198.
Madani, K., Pierce, T. W., & Mirchi, A. (2017). Serious games on environmental management. Sustainable cities and society, 29, 1-11.
Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (2018). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In The matrix of language (pp. 81-98). Routledge.
Pink, S. (2020). Home truths: Gender, domestic objects and everyday life. Routledge.
Prawitha, F. R., Rahmawati, R., & Pradipta, B. M. (2023). Overview of Family Education and Culture: Masculinity Male Dancer. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 3(1), 26-47.
Riani, M., Perrotta, D., & Torti, F. (2012). FSDA: A MATLAB toolbox for robust analysis and interactive data exploration. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 116, 17-32.
Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40, 173-213.
Sumerau, J. E., & Cragun, R. T. (2015). The hallmarks of righteous women: Gendered background expectations in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Sociology of Religion, 76(1), 49-71.
Tagg, C., & Seargeant, P. (2014). Audience design and language choice in the construction and maintenance of translocal communities on social network sites. In The language of social media: Identity and community on the internet (pp. 161-185). Springer.
Ubaydullayeva, M. (2022). Socio-Cultural Notions of Gender Dynamics in Linguistic Researches. Академические исследования в современной науке, 1(15), 149-152.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v13i1.12773
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
© All rights reserved 2023. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris (ISSN Print: 2252-7818), (ISSN Online: 2502-3543)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.