STUDENT’S ATTITUDE ON CRITICAL LITERACY - BASED INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING WRITING IN EFL CLASSROOM
Abstract
The study investigates the student’s attitude toward critical literacy-based instruction in teaching writing in EFL university classrooms it employs a descriptive study using a purposive sampling technique and takes 30 respondents from EFL university students. The questionnaire and interview were used to collect data on the perception of EFL university Students on critical literacy-based instruction in the process of learning and observation was applied to gain data on the EFL Students’ interaction with critical Literacy based Instruction in teaching critical literacy in teaching writing in EFL classroom fall into 3 categories: (1) highly understanding of Critical Literacy (HUCL): (2) moderately understanding of Critical Literacy (MUCL) (3) low understanding of Critical literacy (LUCL). This research is expected to be beneficial for lecturers, students, and stakeholders to enrich knowledge and develop language skills and proficiency based on critical literacy instruction to teach writing in EFL classrooms. This research is to be a reference for teacher professional development, especially teacher capacity teaching writing EFL classrooms.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andersson, A. (2011). Comprehensive or Selective Feedback, that is the Question A Literature Review Focusing on Writing Strategies in an EFL/ESL Classroom. Universitet Goteborgs: Ämneslärarprogramet
Boscolo, P., & Hidi, S. (2007). The Multiple Meanings of Motivation to Write. In Writing and Motivation (p. 334). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Celik, T. (2015). Evaluation of Private Writing from the Student’s Viewpoint. International Journal Social Science & Education. 5 (2), 269-279
Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., & Stokking, K. M. (2010). Progress Feedback Effects on Students’ Writing Mastery Goal, Self-Efficacy Beliefs, and Performance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16 (1), 53–74.
Elbow, P. (2000). Everyone Can Write: Essays Toward a Hopeful Theory of Writing and Teaching Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Galbraith, D., & Torrance, M. (2004). Revision in the Context of Different Drafting Strategies. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision of written language: Cognitive and instructional approaches (pp. 63-86). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Galbraith, D. (2009). Cognitive Models of Writing. German as a Foreign Language Journal, 2 (3): 7-22.
Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W. (2007). The Structural Relationship between Writing Attitude and Writing Achievement in First and Third Grade Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 516-536.
Gupta, D. & Woldemariam, G. S. (2011). The Influence of Motivation and Attitude on Writing Strategy Use of Undergraduate EFL Students: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 34-89.
Hamidun, N, Hashim, S. H., & Othman, N. F. (2012). Enhancing Students’ Motivation by Providing Feedback on Writing: The Case of International Students from Thailand International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2 (6), 591-594.
Hashemian, M., & Heidari, A. (2013). The Relationship between L2 Learners’ Motivation/Attitude and Success in L2 Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 476–489.
Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and Writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, (pp. 144-157). New York: Guildford Press.
Ismail, N., Elias, S., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Perumal, P. D., & Muthusamy, I. (2010). Exploring ESL Students’ Apprehension Level and Attitude Towards Academic Writing. International Journal of Learning, 17(6), 475–484.
Ismail, N., Hussin, S., & Darus, S. (2012). ESL students’ Attitude, Learning Problems, and Needs For Online Writing. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(4), 1089–1107.
Kellog, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14 (2), 355-365.
Kellogg, R.T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology, 103 (3), 327-342.
Kellog, R. T. (1999). The Psychology of Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S. (1989). We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464. Retreived September 26, 2016 from http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x
Lin, G. H. C., & Chien, P. S. C. (2009). An Investigation into Effectiveness of Peer Feedback. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages Fortune Institute of Technology, 3, 79–87.
Maguire, F. (1989). Eleven Strategies for Building Self-Confidence in Student Writers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas
Pajares, F & Valiante, G. (2006). Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Motivation in Writing Development. In Charles A. MacArthur,Steve Graham,Jill Fitzgerald (Eds). Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 155-168). New York: Guilford Press
Podsen, I. J. (1997). Written Expression:The Principal’s Survival Guide. Larchmont,NY: Eye on Education.
Preiss, D. D., Castillo, J. C., Grigorenko, E. L., & Manzi, J. (2013). Argumentative Writing and Academic Achievement: A longitudinal Study. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 204–211.
Rahmatunisa, W. (2014). Problems Faced By Indonesian EFL Learners. English Review: Journal of English Education, 3(1), 41-49
Raimes, A.(1985).What unskilled ESL students do as they Write: A Classroom Study of Composing,TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 229-258.
Simpson, J. M. (2006). Feedback on Writing: Changing EFL Students’ Attitudes. TESL Canada Journal, 24(1), 96–112.
Tsao, C. H. (2012). The Effect Of Error Correction On EFL Student Writing . Journal of Educational Research, 45 (1), 89-110
Wang, L. (2010). Effect of Social Changes on Chinese Language Change in Translation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(4), 527–529. Retreived 23 September, 2016 from http://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.4.527-529
Zhu, W. (2001). Performing Argumentative Writing in English: Difficulties Processes and Strategies. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL Du Canada, 19(1), 34–50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/konfiks.v9i2.8720
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL KONFIKS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal Konfiks is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.