An Ethical Audit Model for the Governance of Indonesia’s Digital Tax System: Integrating the Principles of Fairness, Transparency, and Accountability
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/tfna1d42
Ethics Audit, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Tax Governance, Fairness, Accountability.
Abstract
The transformation of the digital tax system through the implementation of the Core Tax Administration System (CTAS) marks a new era in artificial intelligence (AI) based fiscal governance in Indonesia. While bringing high efficiency, AI implementation also raises ethical challenges such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency in automated decisions and unclear human responsibility for system outcomes. This study aims to develop an AI Ethics Audit Model that integrates the principles of fairness, transparency and accountability (FTA) to strengthen fair and accountable digital tax governance. The research approach used is a qualitative descriptive approach with a development research model design, which combines a literature review of 45 journals (2018–2025), in-depth interviews with five experts (three DGT officials and two AI ethics academics), and analysis of policy documents such as PMK No. 81 of 2024 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023. The results show that there is still a risk of data bias, limited algorithm documentation and the absence of a formal ethics oversight mechanism at the DGT. Based on these findings, five stages of an AI ethics audit are formulated: audit planning, ethical risk identification, control evaluation, audit reporting and monitoring and follow up. This model provides a theoretical contribution by strengthening the concept of ethical assurance in digital governance, and a practical contribution by providing an ethical oversight framework for the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) to ensure the transparent, fair and responsible implementation of AI in the national tax system.
References
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2021). Auditing dan Jasa Assurance (terjemahan). In Pearson Education Limited.
Bryson, J. J. ., Andriessen, J. E. ., & Winfield, A. F. T. (2020). Responsible AI: Implementing ethical principles. AI & Society, 35(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00879-2
Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence : ethical , legal and technical opportunities and challenges Subject Areas : Author for correspondence :
Creswell, J. W.; Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Doshi-Velez, F.; Kim, B. (2018). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.08608
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2022). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 15–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00460-6
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing.
Jensen, C., & Meckling, H. (1976). THEORY OF THE FIRM : MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR , AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE I . Introduction and summary In this paper WC draw on recent progress in the theory of ( 1 ) property rights , firm . In addition to tying together elements of the theory of e. 3, 305–360.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). Artificial Intelligence : the global landscape of ethics guidelines.
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
Nataliawati, R., Yaumi, S., Qosim, Yulianita, F., & Sutiani. (2024). Implementation of Artificial Neural Networks as a Method for Early Detection of Tax Evasion Behavior in Indonesia. 4(4), 273–284.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
OECD. (2021). OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/cb6d99c9-en
OECD. (2023a). Tax Administration 2023: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/74d162b6-en
OECD. (2023b). Tax Administration 2023: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1787/74d162b6-en
Rahwan, I. (2017). Society-in-the-Loop : Programming the Algorithmic Social Contract.
Sætra, H. S. (2023). AI, ethics and the law: The case for AI accountability. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00109-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
