Analysis Of Ethics, Sustainability and CSR In The Burger King Company

Devina Wistiasari, Teo Laiy Soon Irpan Ardiansyah, Helen Salwa, Eriva Riesquita, Esther Agustina

Abstract


Burger King from its name alone makes you know that this company operates in the culinary sector, which is the point of its name, namely burgers, which are definitely the main menu of its name. Currently, there are many companies and individuals who sell this food, one of which is Burger King. Burger King was first founded in Miami, Florida, America. Currently, Burger King has almost 19,247 branches throughout the world and 31 branches in all cities in Indonesia. Burger King has a variety of very interesting menu variants, not only burgers but also fried chicken, potatoes, and various other menus that are no less delicious than their burgers. Burger King also makes package menus containing potatoes and drinks too, but we as consumers can also buy certain foods that we want. Burger King also often creates special menus that are only released at certain moments or collaborates with other food brands which makes it even more attractive to consumers. In Indonesia itself, Burger King has also included its company in online applications such as Gofood, Grab, and others. Burger King fans are not only adults but all groups, from children to the elderly, love this food.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2019). Corporate sustainability and responsibility: An introductory review and future directions. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1-15.

Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll's pyramid of corporate social responsibility: A review and future perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(1), 1-16.

Elkington, J. (2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase "triple bottom line." Here's why it's time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 58-67.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2019). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.

Lencioni, P. (2016). The ideal team player: How to recognize and cultivate the three essential virtues. John Wiley & Sons.

Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Human Resource Management Review, 29(4), 436-456.

Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2019). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 53(1), 1-27.

Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights. WW Norton & Company.

Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility. Routledge.

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2018). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 60(1), 2-24.

Haynes, K., & Murray, A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development: A systematic review and conceptual analysis. Sustainability, 12(4), 1504.

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(1), 105-131.

Russo, M. V., & Harrison, J. S. (2015). Organizational design and employee behavior in regard to corporate social responsibility: A conceptual model. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(4),

Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1)

Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, government, and civil society: The case of Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 447-462.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/inv.v5i2.12311

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Flag Counter

 

Creative Commons License

Invoice : Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi Is Licenced Under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Noderivatives 4.0 International License