IMPLEMENTING AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) AS AN INTERACTIVE TOOL FOR MASTERING MARITIME ENGLISH IN ENGINEERING TOOLS LEARNING
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/rbjfwb36
Augmented Reality, Engine Tools Learning, Maritime English
Abstract
Mastering Maritime English, particularly technical terminology related to engine tools, is essential for marine engineering cadets to support effective onboard communication and operational safety. However, traditional instructional methods often fail to help cadets visualize, retain, and accurately pronounce complex technical vocabulary.Despite the growing integration of Augmented Reality (AR) in education, limited studies have specifically explored its application in Maritime English learning for engineering tools. Therefore, this study aimed to design and implement an AR-based interactive learning product to enhance cadets’ understanding, engagement, retention, and pronunciation accuracy in Maritime English learning. This study employed a mixed-methods approach involving 25 second-semester Marine Engineering cadets at the Merchant Marine Polytechnic of Makassar selected through purposive sampling. Quantitative data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires, while qualitative data were obtained through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews exploring cadets’ learning experiences, cognitive engagement, and interaction with the AR application. The findings revealed that the AR-based learning product significantly improved cadets’ learning experiences and technical vocabulary mastery. The product integrated 3D visualization, audio pronunciation, and interactive features that enabled cadets to better understand and memorize engine tools terminology. Quantitative results showed high average scores in effectiveness and pronunciation accuracy (4.56), retention (4.52), and engagement (4.43). Qualitative findings further demonstrated that AR promoted active participation, self-directed learning, and repeated pronunciation practice through immersive interaction. This study contributes to Maritime English pedagogy by providing an innovative and contextualized AR-based learning approach specifically designed for technical engine tools terminology. The findings suggest that AR can bridge the gap between theoretical Maritime English instruction and practical technical understanding in maritime education.
References
Ahmmed, R. (2021). A framework for Maritime English language planning in maritime education and training institutes. SN Social Sciences, 1(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00188-5
Alhazmi, K. (2024). The effect of multimedia on vocabulary learning and retention. World Journal of English Language, 14(6), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p390
Aminah, A., & Refnaldi. (2020). Students’ needs on maritime English learning material: A case at vocational high schools. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.041
Batu, P. N. L., Priadi, A. A., & Cahyaningrum, W. (2021). Accessible learning sources: A needs analysis on maritime English learning apps. Transactions on Maritime Science, 10(2), 520. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v10.n02.020
Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2021). Needs analysis for Maritime English courses: A review of the state of the art. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.002
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Burhanuddin, N. A. N., Ahmad, N. A., Said, R. R., & Asimiran, S. (2021). Learning theories: Views from behaviourism theory and constructivism theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i1/8590
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Contreras-Villalobos et al. (2024). Transformative mixed-methods research. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260124000365?via%3Dihub
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2020). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=125393
Dhivya, D. S., Hariharasudan, A., & Nawaz, N. (2023). Unleashing potential: Multimedia learning and Education 4.0 in learning Professional English Communication. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2248751
Faradillah, I. (2025). Need analysis on teaching Maritime English for nautical students: Current practices and future directions. Berajah Journal, 5(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.47353/bj.v5i2.583
Godoy, C. H. (2020). Augmented reality for education. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.02386v1.pdf
Gupta, N., Ali, K., Jiang, D., & Du, X. (2024). Beyond autonomy: Unpacking self-regulated and self-directed learning through the lens of learner agency—A scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 24, Article 1519. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06476-x
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., & Kanbach, D. K. (2024).
What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113988
Li, M., Gao, Q., & Yu, T. (2023). Kappa statistic considerations in evaluating inter-rater reliability between two raters: Which, when and context matters. BMC Cancer, 23, 799. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11325-z
Li, S., Ou, L., & Lee, I. (2025). The timing of corrective feedback in second language learning. Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000478
Lu, S. Y., Ren, X. P., Xu, H., & Han, D. (2023). Improving self-directed learning ability of medical students using the blended teaching method: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education, 23, Article 616. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04565-x
Rana, S., & Chimoriya, R. (2025). A guide to the mixed-methods approach. Methods and Protocols, 8(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8020051
Saraswaty, D. R., et al. (2024). The impact of multimedia learning models on listening comprehension: A systematic review.
Saray, S., Satır, T., & Doğan-Sağlamtimur, N. (2021). Proficiency of Maritime English course: An investigation in Istanbul, Turkey. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v3i1.48
Skamagki, G. (2024). Integration in mixed methods research. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593985.2022.2120375?utm.com
Staneviciene, E. (2025). The use of multimedia in higher education: Effects on engagement and learning outcomes.
Sukomardojo, T., & Ratnaningsih, D. (2020). The use of e-learning in Maritime English learning can improve the vocabulary skill of cadets majoring in Electro-Technical Officer Shipping. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development, 3(4), 390. https://doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v3i4.1200
Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Understanding Likert scale and data collection methods. MethodsX, 9, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101889
Tenny, S., Brannan, G. D., & Brannan, J. M. (2022).
Qualitative study. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/
Trenkner, P., & Cole, C. (2020). Maritime English: The lingua franca of the sea. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 19(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00203-9
Vidal-Balea, A., Blanco-Novoa, O., Fraga-Lamas, P., Vilar-Montesinos, M., & Fernández-Caramés, T. M. (2020). A collaborative augmented reality application for training and assistance during shipbuilding assembly processes. https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/proceedings/proceedings-54-00004/article_deploy/proceedings-54-00004.pdf?version=1597720154
Wasti, S. P. (2022). The growing importance of mixed-methods research in health.
Wenfei, Z., Rahmat, M. K., Nizar, N. N. M., & Maaruf, S. Z. (2023). Need analysis survey of designing and developing a mobile augmented reality application for tourism English learning in higher vocational education, China. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i2/16561
Zhu, Y. (2025). The application of multimedia resources in English teaching.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 2026
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
